On Friday 01 April 2011 14:42:33 Stefan Jakobs wrote:
PS: Mike's logreporter script supports postscreen logging, see:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/logreporters/
Sorry, that's not quite correct. A pre-version he posted on the logreporters
mailinglist supports postscreen logging (see:
Hi,
for some admittedly special and braindead setup I needed to relay
outgoing mail via another MTA running on localhost:25. In order to
bypass some of the mail loop safety catches, I exteded inet_interfaces
to accept none.
In case someone might find this useful, I'll publish the path (against
How do I Increase my mail sending speed in postfix
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* postfix post...@spam3.gm.transpac.fr:
Hi
How can tell me why the delay_warning_time parameter is set to 0 per
default?
( traffic increase risk?)
On 04/04/2011 07:16 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Rudy Gevaert:
Hello list,
I am getting a segfault when I run postconf on Solaris 10
SunOS horus 5.10 Generic_142910-17 i86pc i386 i86pc
postconf -n doesn't segfault!
running it with truss:
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps =
* Johan Pappu johanpa...@gmail.com:
How do I Increase my mail sending speed in postfix
First step is to find out what exactly is slow.
* Injection of the messages?
* Sending the actual messages?
* to all destination
* or just to some?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung
to all destinations
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Johan Pappu johanpa...@gmail.com:
How do I Increase my mail sending speed in postfix
First step is to find out what exactly is slow.
* Injection of the messages?
* Sending the
Can you suggest me what changes should i do in main.cf to get the speed
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Johan Pappu johanpa...@gmail.com wrote:
to all destinations
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Johan Pappu johanpa...@gmail.com:
Christoph Moench-Tegeder:
Hi,
for some admittedly special and braindead setup I needed to relay
outgoing mail via another MTA running on localhost:25. In order to
bypass some of the mail loop safety catches, I exteded inet_interfaces
to accept none.
In case someone might find this useful,
Which version has postscreen functioanality?
Regards,
Kshitij
* kshitij mali foreplay...@gmail.com:
Which version has postscreen functioanality?
2.8.x
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30
On 4/5/2011 6:19 AM, kshitij mali wrote:
Which version has postscreen functioanality?
Regards,
Kshitij
The current stable version; postfix 2.8.2 at this time.
## Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org):
for some admittedly special and braindead setup I needed to relay
outgoing mail via another MTA running on localhost:25. In order to
bypass some of the mail loop safety catches, I exteded inet_interfaces
to accept none.
In case someone might find
Hello Wietse and Rudy,
On 04/ 5/11 12:22 PM, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps =
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords =
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions14374: write(1, o w q\n s m t p _ a d
d.., 4096) = 4096
14374: Incurred fault #6, FLTBOUNDS %pc = 0x080775C4
14374: siginfo:
Christoph Moench-Tegeder:
## Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org):
for some admittedly special and braindead setup I needed to relay
outgoing mail via another MTA running on localhost:25. In order to
bypass some of the mail loop safety catches, I exteded inet_interfaces
to accept
## Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org):
Well, postfix still doesn't relay mail to hosts with it's own
host name in the server greeting (host ... greeted me with my own
hostname ... and host ... replied to HELO/EHLO with my own hostname ...),
so it's not that easy to shoot one's own foot.
Christoph Moench-Tegeder:
## Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org):
Well, postfix still doesn't relay mail to hosts with it's own
host name in the server greeting (host ... greeted me with my own
hostname ... and host ... replied to HELO/EHLO with my own hostname
...),
so it's
On 4/4/2011 9:54 PM, email builder wrote:
OK, sorry again. I had assumed because you can turn off header checking by
using receive_override_options, you could also override (change) them.
It is possible to override header_checks by defining a
different cleanup_service_name for smtpd, then
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:49:28PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
It would be a shame if we spend more time on the discussion of the
short-sightedness of my patch than I'd have to spend on fixing my
patch - just to have a better patch documented for those trapped with
broken setups
Noel Jones:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On 4/4/2011 9:54 PM, email builder wrote:
OK, sorry again. I had assumed because you can turn off header checking by
using receive_override_options, you could also override (change) them.
It is possible to override
On Tue, April 5, 2011 2:02 pm, Wietse Venema wrote:
I'm
not good at diplomacy.
Wietse
We know. We like you anyway. :-)
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:38:16PM +0200, ??hsan Do??an wrote:
2.8.1. I have upgraded to 2.8.2 and don't have the problem with that
version. (In fact I wasn't aware a newer version already existed.)
Is this maybe related to:
- Portability: the SUN compiler had trouble with a pointer
Hello, I have recently replaced my old postfix with 2.7.0. And, for the
first time I am trying to use IMAP (dovecot). Receiving email is OK but I
cannot send because of the relay domains issue. Attempts to use SASL with
postfix presents problems I don' t know how to resolve. I havev Google SASL
On 2011-04-05 Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org):
Well, postfix still doesn't relay mail to hosts with it's own host
name in the server greeting (host ... greeted me with my own
hostname ... and host ... replied to HELO/EHLO with my own
hostname ...), so
David Brown:
Hello, I have recently replaced my old postfix with 2.7.0. And, for the
first time I am trying to use IMAP (dovecot). Receiving email is OK but I
cannot send because of the relay domains issue.
OK, so you can't send mail.
Apr 5 15:12:57 myhost postfix/smtpd[30973]: warning:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:33:20PM -0700, email builder wrote:
I am testing a simple header_check that uses PREPEND to add a
custom header to messages.
Uh, no, I think it is not simple at all. Is this the same issue
you're working on? You have spent much time, and gotten much help,
On 4/4/2011 9:54 PM, email builder wrote:
OK, sorry again. I had assumed because you can turn off header checking by
using receive_override_options, you could also override (change) them.
It is possible to override header_checks by defining a different
cleanup_service_name
for
On 4/5/2011 12:54 PM, email builder wrote:
master.cf smtpd process entry:
-o
smtpd_data_restrictions=check_sender_access,pcre:/etc/postfix/add_my_header
/etc/postfix/add_my_header:
/^/ PREPEND X-My-Header: Hello_world
Easier than I thought. Now, PLEASE don't take this the wrong
email builder:
some smtpd_*_restrictions checks. It turns out (from my testing, but I can't
find this in the docs) that you can still use PREPEND to add a header even
though you're looking at certain envelope data.
ACCESS(5)
OK, sorry again. I had assumed because you can turn off header checking
by
using receive_override_options, you could also override (change) them.
It is possible to override header_checks by defining a
different cleanup_service_name for smtpd, then defining that
cleanup
master.cf smtpd process entry:
-o
smtpd_data_restrictions=check_sender_access,pcre:/etc/postfix/add_my_header
/etc/postfix/add_my_header:
/^/ PREPEND X-My-Header: Hello_world
Easier than I thought. Now, PLEASE don't take this the wrong way, but I'm
email builder:
What I ran into while solving the add-a-header issue (see my last
post on this thread) was that I can use a FILTER action from a
smtpd_*_restriction check to select a specialized smtp process
that is bound to a given IP address.
I found, however, that the FILTER action's
Check the permissions on the sasldb2 file. Postfix user needs to have
access to it.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
David Brown:
Hello, I have recently replaced my old postfix with 2.7.0. And, for the
first time I am trying to use IMAP (dovecot).
* David Brown geezens...@gmail.com:
Hello, I have recently replaced my old postfix with 2.7.0. And, for the
first time I am trying to use IMAP (dovecot). Receiving email is OK but I
cannot send because of the relay domains issue. Attempts to use SASL with
postfix presents problems I don' t
What I ran into while solving the add-a-header issue (see my last
post on this thread) was that I can use a FILTER action from a
smtpd_*_restriction check to select a specialized smtp process
that is bound to a given IP address.
I found, however, that the FILTER action's
Hi people.
I have a server + spam gateway they are working.
I want to move to TLS, I already had my certs and they ware working, I want
to setup Postfix MTA to use my Certs and be more secure.
I had read postfix info and looks like I understand the setup, my doubt is
with my spam-gateway,
email builder:
Here is what I've done with the typo corrected. Is this a Bad
Idea? Are there problems with naively using the domain from the
recipient email address as the
nexthop value?
master.cf:
smtp2 unix - - n - - smtp
-o
Here is what I've done with the typo corrected. Is this a Bad
Idea? Are there problems with naively using the domain from the
recipient email address as the
nexthop value?
master.cf:
smtp2 unix - - n- - smtp
-o
email builder:
Here is what I've done with the typo corrected. Is this a Bad
Idea? Are there problems with naively using the domain from the
recipient email address as the
nexthop value?
master.cf:
smtp2 unix - - n- - smtp
On 4/5/2011 3:35 PM, email builder wrote:
Here is what I've done with the typo corrected. Is this a Bad
Idea? Are there problems with naively using the domain from the
recipient email address as the
nexthop value?
master.cf:
smtp2 unix - - n- - smtp
Here is what I've done with the typo corrected. Is this a Bad
Idea? Are there problems with naively using the domain from the
recipient email address as the
nexthop value?
master.cf:
smtp2 unix - - n - - smtp
email builder:
The configuration makes absolutely no sense at all.
Hmm, I'm not sure why you see *no* sense in it.
If you can configure Postfix to send some email to port 10024 (which
uses a wild-card access map rule to send out all email via transport
smtp2)
Then you can configure Postfix
Here is what I've done with the typo corrected. Is this a Bad
Idea? Are there problems with naively using the domain from the
recipient email address as the
nexthop value?
master.cf:
smtp2 unix - - n - - smtp
-o
The configuration makes absolutely no sense at all.
Hmm, I'm not sure why you see *no* sense in it.
If you can configure Postfix to send some email to port 10024 (which
uses a wild-card access map rule to send out all email via transport
smtp2)
Then you can configure Postfix
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:02:11PM -0700, Fire walls wrote:
I want to move to TLS, I already had my certs and they ware working, I want
to setup Postfix MTA to use my Certs and be more secure.
TLS is not a synonym for security. Enabling TLS does not necessarily
make your mail server more
Hi,
I've built installed Postfix 2.8.2 from src, and followed the installs
steps examples:
http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html
I've ended up with a 4-instance edge
dchil...@bestmail.us:
Also, if I'm going to deploy postscreen, am I correct in understanding
that. in this example's case, I'd deploy it @ each of the two inbound
pre-filter instances? in lieu of a separate filter stage?
Postscreen is an additional line of defense. It does not replace
the
Hi Wietse
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
wrote:
Postscreen is an additional line of defense. It does not replace
the other Postfix features, but rather, it aims to reduce the
pressure on those features.
Okay.
Is that doesn't replace true for all its
Here is what I've done with the typo corrected. Is this a Bad
Idea? Are there problems with naively using the domain from the
recipient email address as the
nexthop value?
master.cf:
smtp2 unix - - n - - smtp
- Original Message
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Mon, April 4, 2011 2:12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Multiple transport maps in master.cf?
* email builder emailbuilde...@yahoo.com:
Hello,
I've found that in main.cf, this
OK, thank you very much for the pointer to smtp_bind_address. That's what
I
need, but I'm stumbling at the transport map. I already have outgoing
mail
segregated how I want it when it exits my content filtering (ready to be
sent
out). So ideally, the content filter
Can you suggest me what changes should i do?
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Johan Pappu johanpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you suggest me what changes should i do in main.cf to get the speed
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Johan Pappu johanpa...@gmail.com wrote:
to all destinations
On
51 matches
Mail list logo
