LinkedIn
kibirango Moses requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
James,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- kibirango
Accept invitation from kibirango Moses
LinkedIn
kibirango Moses requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
James,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- kibirango
Accept invitation from kibirango Moses
On 05/24/2011 01:03 AM, Boris Korzun wrote:
RFC 2822 says that originator header fields with the full name (of person who
sent the message) in parentheses after address without angle brakets is legacy
form. And postfix's sendmail sends message from user with the fullname in
parentheses,
On 05/24/2011 08:44 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/24/2011 01:03 AM, Boris Korzun wrote:
RFC 2822 says that originator header fields with the full name (of
person who sent the message) in parentheses after address without
angle brakets is legacy form. And postfix's sendmail sends message
Just curious if it's possible to pass messages that match certain
header checks to postgrey instead of flat out rejecting them. The
reason I ask is that I was trying out some of the S25R
http://www.gabacho-net.jp/en/anti-spam/anti-spam-system.html
rejection rules, and started noticing false
Patrick Ben Koetter:
I've just come across the article Successful timing attacks on elliptic curve
cryptography
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Successful-timing-attacks-on-elliptic-curve-cryptography-1247772.html
and I am trying to figure out if the problem described affects
24.05.2011, 17:44, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
If your client submits mail with the legacy form of the From: header,
fix the client.
I send the message via sendmail(1) - sendmail -F 'Fullname' drtr0...@domain.tld
And I get the header:
Postfix's sendmail(1): From: sen...@domain.tld
Boris Korzun:
24.05.2011, 17:44, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
If your client submits mail with the legacy form of the From: header,
fix the client.
I send the message via sendmail(1) - sendmail -F 'Fullname'
drtr0...@domain.tld
If you want From: Fullname sen...@domain.tld, then
On 5/24/2011 2:38 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
Just curious if it's possible to pass messages that match certain
header checks to postgrey instead of flat out rejecting them. The
reason I ask is that I was trying out some of the S25R
http://www.gabacho-net.jp/en/anti-spam/anti-spam-system.html
Am 24.05.2011 13:43, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 5/24/2011 2:38 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
Just curious if it's possible to pass messages that match certain
header checks to postgrey instead of flat out rejecting them. The
reason I ask is that I was trying out some of the S25R
I run a small mail server which receives mail for a few domains.
So far I've been unable to get a catch-all address working. I tried
these settings:
local_recipient_maps =
luser_relay = m...@jonathangazeley.com
Emails to t...@jonathangazeley.com (which does not exist) are rejected
with 550.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:03:42PM +0100, Jonathan Gazeley wrote:
I run a small mail server which receives mail for a few domains.
So far I've been unable to get a catch-all address working. I tried these
settings:
local_recipient_maps =
luser_relay = m...@jonathangazeley.com
Emails to
Hi,
postfix-2.2.10-1.4.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.plus
I am trying to get 2 instances to play nicely. Main SMTP server mobo blew, so
had to spin up another on an alternate box. I can't get to the existing config
files. Network topology is such that I have a NIC on the DMZ side and a NIC on
the
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:42:47AM -0700, Ray Dzek wrote:
When I change the inet_interfaces = smtp.specialized.com on the primary
inbound instance the mail comes in, but can't find its way out of the box
to relay to our internal Exchange server. If I leave inet_interfaces =
all mail works
I think we are having directory harvest attacks on our OS X Server. I am not
familiar with postfix and we use this server primarily to send mail out from
our web servers on the same subnet. There are a few account that receive
mail and are popped but no mail really stored on the server. I have OS
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:08:36PM -0400, Ryan Buffa wrote:
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, mail2.4nova.net,
$mydomain
So 4nova.net is your domain.
mynetworks = 74.84.205.0/24, 74.95.99.16/28, 65.254.210.137, 74.84.205.84
And these are your trusted client
Thank you for your input Victor.
My sender_access file only contains OK rules no reject rules. Should I just
remove the sender_access list? I don't know that it is really helping or
that I have it setup properly if it is full of OK instead of REJECT.
Do you think this is the culprit to my
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:53:26PM -0400, Ryan Buffa wrote:
Thank you for your input Victor.
My sender_access file only contains OK rules no reject rules.
This is wrong. It MUST contain zero OK rules, envelope sender
addresses are unauthenticated, and forgeries will be relayed.
Should I
Thank you so much for your time. I have removed the line,
check_sender_access hash://etc/postfix/sender_access
Is there anything else I should do?
Thanks Again!
Ryan
Here is my new config file.
biff = no
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter =
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 05:15:39PM -0400, Ryan Buffa wrote:
Thank you so much for your time. I have removed the line,
check_sender_access hash://etc/postfix/sender_access
Is there anything else I should do?
Get removed from any blacklists you're on as a result of any
previous spam. Watch your
Hello Ryan,
Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 4:15:39 PM, you wrote:
Thank you so much for your time. I have removed the line,
check_sender_access hash://etc/postfix/sender_access
Is there anything else I should do?
Thanks Again!
Ryan
Here is my new config file.
...
smtpd_client_restrictions =
21 matches
Mail list logo
