* Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org:
fail2ban could be ones friend if postfix have this
fail2ban then just grep logs for outgoing mails that failed pr ip,
and add this header ignore pr cidr maps
Yeah, that's a great idea!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Are there any major code changes involved with the change from 2.x
to 3.x, or is it just that the minor/micro version counter needed
resetting?
Just the counters, according to Linus
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:39:11 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org:
fail2ban could be ones friend if postfix have this
fail2ban then just grep logs for outgoing mails that failed pr ip,
and add this header ignore pr cidr maps
Yeah, that's a great idea!
it is ?, oh
Am 15.06.2011 08:39, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org:
fail2ban could be ones friend if postfix have this
fail2ban then just grep logs for outgoing mails that failed pr ip,
and add this header ignore pr cidr maps
Yeah, that's a great idea!
but what if there are
Hello, I've a postfix 2.5.1 with system users. I need to restrict one
user to be able to send mail to local users only.
My conf:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
bounce_queue_lifetime = 1d
config_directory = /etc/postfix
Hello
I would like to stop incoming/outgoing email to our site
without stopping internal emails exchange.
my configuration is quite classic
INTERNET
|
|
MX SERVER
|
|
INTERNAL MAILHUB
On 15/06/2011 11:19, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I would like to stop incoming/outgoing email to our site
without stopping internal emails exchange.
my configuration is quite classic
INTERNET
|
|
MX SERVER
|
On Wednesday June 15 2011 05:42:36 Noel Jones wrote:
At this time I'm inclined to set this aside. The DKIM bug
doesn't seem to be widespread; there is no compelling case to
add a new workaround right now.
Indeed the situation has much improved in the past year or two.
Many sites have turned
Victor Duchovni:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:05:24PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
I was thinking a setting integrated with smtp_pix_workarounds would be more
automatic, with little maintenance once configured.
Given that the banner detection is incomplete (some pixen are not
obviously such)
Hi All,
I manage a local intranet mail server which collects mails from our local users
and sends them all via our public mail hub server.
Everything was fine until few weeks ago. Some small part of our emails (about
10%) hangs
in mail's server queue with error: timeout exceeded (in reply to
Hi guys
At the moment we use local spamfiltering on our MX smtp.terena.org.
I would like to test out a new mail filtering product, which is a hosted
solution. This system is configured to accept mail for our domains, and
deliver it to smtp.terena.org.
Eventually if this filter is deemed OK then
On 6/15/2011 7:21 AM, Dyonisius Visser wrote:
Hi guys
At the moment we use local spamfiltering on our MX smtp.terena.org.
I would like to test out a new mail filtering product, which is a hosted
solution. This system is configured to accept mail for our domains, and
deliver it to
Tomasz Iwanowski:
Hi All,
I manage a local intranet mail server which collects mails from our local
users
and sends them all via our public mail hub server.
Everything was fine until few weeks ago. Some small part of our emails (about
10%) hangs
in mail's server queue with error:
Dyonisius Visser:
Hi guys
At the moment we use local spamfiltering on our MX smtp.terena.org.
I would like to test out a new mail filtering product, which is a hosted
solution. This system is configured to accept mail for our domains, and
deliver it to smtp.terena.org.
Eventually if this
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:21:27PM +0200, Dyonisius Visser wrote:
So I guess I am looking for a sort of 'conditional' transport: only mail
for vis...@terena.org that does not have a X-Spam-Flag header should be
going to smtp:remote.filter.box.
Any idea how to achieve this?
The re-injection
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:38:44AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Command:
# tcpdump -s 0 -w /file/name host server-ip-address and port 25
After some time, kill -INT the tcpdump process.
Look in the logfile for a session that breaks, and find that session
in the tcpdump recording.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:19:33AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
INTERNET
|
|
MX SERVER
|
|
INTERNAL MAILHUB
|
|
USERS'S MUAs
What I
Hi there,
Spamass-milter has stopped processing messages from Postfix. I have
tested the milter socket and it works. To test that it worked I used :-
http://www.itg.uiuc.edu/itg_software/milter_watch/ and Spamass-milter
rejected the spammy messages.
The spam threshold on the spam milter is
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:43:40 AM J4K wrote:
Hi there,
Spamass-milter has stopped processing messages from Postfix. I have
tested the milter socket and it works. To test that it worked I used :-
http://www.itg.uiuc.edu/itg_software/milter_watch/ and Spamass-milter
rejected the
thank you for the quick response and patch!
ron
On 06/15/2011 01:48 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Csillag Tamas:
quoting from here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/29/204
So what are the big changes?
NOTHING. Absolutely nothing. Sure, we have the usual two thirds driver
changes, and a lot of random
--
On 06/15/2011 06:17 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:43:40 AM J4K wrote:
Hi there,
Spamass-milter has stopped processing messages from Postfix. I have
tested the milter socket and it works. To test that it worked I used :-
Hi there,
Sorry for the trivial question, I am a little confused what is a bounce
message and how not to get these internal Postfix messages.
From my server hub-dev-app01.dev.medplus.com, I send a message to
hub-int-app01.dev.medplus.com. (They both running Postfix 2.3.x).
Because my
On 06/15/2011 10:11 AM, mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
Hello, I've a postfix 2.5.1 with system users. I need to restrict one
user to be able to send mail to local users only.
My conf:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
JKL:
On 06/15/2011 06:17 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:43:40 AM J4K wrote:
Hi there,
Spamass-milter has stopped processing messages from Postfix. I have
tested the milter socket and it works. To test that it worked I used :-
Jeroen,
Thanks, the way I see it is that the remote SMTP server rejects the
message, so my local SMTP server is generating this bounce message to
notify the sender.
So, if I am sending a message that has invalid recipient address or the
message exceeds limit, there is no way not getting these
On 06/15/2011 09:48 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Jeroen,
Thanks, the way I see it is that the remote SMTP server rejects the
message, so my local SMTP server is generating this bounce message to
notify the sender.
So, if I am sending a message that has invalid recipient address or the
message exceeds
I had postfix main.cf set like this.
bounce_notice_recipient =
But seeing following error. The default value is postmaster, so this
only disables bounce sent to postmaster, not to the original sender,
right?
What am I missing?
Jun 15 21:01:47 dir-dev-app01 postfix/bounce[28942]: fatal: bad
Zhou, Yan:
Jun 15 21:01:47 dir-dev-app01 postfix/bounce[28942]: fatal: bad string
length 0 1: bounce_notice_recipient =
The bounce_notice_recipient value must not be empty. As documented,
this is the address where copies of bounce notices are sent.
As documented, the notify_classes parameter
Hello,
For our setup here we needed to selectively disable BCC mappings without
disabling the other mappings. So attached is a patch that adds this capability
to receive_override_options . It does not change any other behavior.
The patch is against v2.8.3. I hope that it will be integrated
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:44:36AM +0300, karave...@mail.bg wrote:
For our setup here we needed to selectively disable BCC mappings without
disabling the other mappings. So attached is a patch that adds this
capability to receive_override_options . It does not change any other
behavior.
karave...@mail.bg:
Hello,
For our setup here we needed to selectively disable BCC mappings
without disabling the other mappings. So attached is a patch that
adds this capability to receive_override_options . It does not
change any other behavior.
I don't understand this.
Apparently you can't
- Цитат от Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org), на 16.06.2011 в 01:18 -
karave...@mail.bg:
Hello,
For our setup here we needed to selectively disable BCC mappings
without disabling the other mappings. So attached is a patch that
adds this capability to receive_override_options . It
Wietse:
Apparently you can't use receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
because you need virtual alias or canonical mapping on both sides
of the filter?
karave...@mail.bg:
We do not use it before/after filter. The setup is that BCC mapping
is only needed for sending outgoing mail (we
- Цитат от Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org), на 16.06.2011
в 02:44 - Wietse:
Apparently you can't use receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
because you need virtual alias or canonical mapping on both sides
of the filter?
karave...@mail.bg:
We do not use it
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 07:44:53PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
We do not use it before/after filter. The setup is that BCC mapping
is only needed for sending outgoing mail (we send a copy to the
Sent folder) so we enable BCC mapping by default (in main.cf)
and disable it on default smtpd
- Цитат от Victor Duchovni (victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com),
на 16.06.2011 в 05:27 -
Or this?
/etc/postfix/master.cf
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o sender_bcc_maps=maptype:mapname
As the OP observed, correctly, this won't work since bcc is
Thanks a lot Viktor.
Le 15/06/2011 17:38, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:19:33AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
INTERNET
|
|
MX SERVER
|
|
INTERNAL MAILHUB
well I do not use iptables because I run FreeBSD
but I think it would be feasable with pf or ipfw
Thanks
Le 15/06/2011 11:31, mail...@securitylabs.it a écrit :
On 15/06/2011 11:19, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I would like to stop incoming/outgoing email to our site
without stopping internal
38 matches
Mail list logo
