* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
On 8/4/2011 9:57 AM, Alejandro Facultad wrote:
What is the difference if the recipients opt in receive the mails or not,
from the point of view of spam black lists ???
No difference, if you're referring to DNSBLs. Almost all are trap
driven.
...
Ýou mean *client*.
smtp_client_restrictions = reject_unknown_client_hostname
NOTE that this is a very heavy restriction and will cause many, many
false positives.
I'll use warn-if-reject to see how is going.
Instead, use the milder (but equally effective)
I do have the same concerns, is there any way to implement users bases
sending policies through postfix
Regards,
B~Mork
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Facultad
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 7:57 PM
To:
Am 05.08.2011 10:13, schrieb Bjron Mork:
I do have the same concerns, is there any way to implement users bases
sending policies through postfix …
*Regards,*
*B~Mork*
Hi, search the list archives for recommands on sending
mass mails, there are tons of of good advices on it.
Dear all
By default the log created by postfix and dovecot goes to /var/log/maillog.
I want to take the log separately.
How can I do that? I googled but nothing found like that.
--
Jeherul Islam
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
India
* JEHERUL jehe...@gmail.com:
Dear all
By default the log created by postfix and dovecot goes to /var/log/maillog.
I want to take the log separately.
How can I do that? I googled but nothing found like that.
:)
Multiple options:
* use a syslogd which can do filtering (syslog-ng) based on
Am 05.08.2011 13:31, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
* JEHERUL jehe...@gmail.com:
Dear all
By default the log created by postfix and dovecot goes to /var/log/maillog.
I want to take the log separately.
How can I do that? I googled but nothing found like that.
:)
Multiple options:
* use a
* Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org:
or use seperate dovecot log file
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Logging
Oh yes. My solution dates back to courier-imap, where courier-imap was
not configurable at all!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité -
On 05/08/2011 13:28, JEHERUL wrote:
Dear all
By default the log created by postfix and dovecot goes to /var/log/maillog. I
want to take the log separately.
With rsyslog u can use 'expressions' (see the docs), u can do something similar
to rsyslog with syslog-ng
--
Simone Caruso
IT
Am 05.08.2011 13:28, schrieb JEHERUL:
Dear all
By default the log created by postfix and dovecot goes to /var/log/maillog.
I want to take the log separately.
How can I do that? I googled but nothing found like that
this is a dovecot question
so if you searach for dovecot logging instead
Hi everyone,
A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded (base64)
final message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size of message +
attachments?
(Encoded message size should be about 30% larger than the original, so
if we want to allow attachments of max size e.g.
G'day All,
My Postfix fu is weak these days, so I'm going to ask for a bit of
help. I've dredged-up all I could remember of advanced Postfix
techniques, trawled the various docs and HowTos, and haven't been able
to solve this.
We have multiple domains. We have one mail gateway. We have two
On Friday, August 05, 2011 at 15:37 CEST,
Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote:
A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded
(base64) final message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size
of message + attachments?
The former. That's the only representation of an email
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 at 19:25 CEST,
Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 2011-08-02 06:30, Noel Butler wrote:
Has been a while since I've looked at this, but at present if we
need to alias a domain, eg f...@example.com to f...@example.net
we are using
On 5/8/2011 5:12 μμ, Magnus Bäck wrote:
A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded
(base64) final message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size
of message + attachments?
The former. That's the only representation of an email that's ever sent
or stored.
Thanks,
Nick
Hi all
I am using postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6 on centos 5.6.I have configured postfix
to server 2 virtual domains and now I need to use mailing list. I installed
mailman-2.1.9-6.el5_6.1 when I add the virtual domain to
/etc/mailman/mm_cfg.py and run the command /usr/lib/mailman/bin/genaliases I
got
On 8/5/2011 9:34 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
I am using postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6 on centos 5.6.I have configured
postfix to server 2 virtual domains and now I need to use mailing
list. I installed mailman-2.1.9-6.el5_6.1 when I add the virtual
domain to /etc/mailman/mm_cfg.py and run the
All,
My Postfix (2.7.0 Ubuntu) mail server has just begun logging several hundred
attempts of:
Aug 5 13:35:37 lollipop postfix/smtpd[23022]: connect from
unknown[173.0.131.197]
Aug 5 13:35:37 lollipop postfix/smtpd[22847]: disconnect from
joker.iwswebhosting.com[208.101.4.76]
Aug 5
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:41:16 -0400 (EDT)
Gary Chambers gwch...@gwcmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Will someone please assist me in determining the problem or offer any
short- (or long-) term suggestions? Thank you very much!
What problem are you trying to solve?
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server
Jim,
What problem are you trying to solve?
Thanks for the reply.
I've been poring over the backscatterer README and from what I can tell, my
server isn't the problem. Having the experts validate that will help
substantially, though. I was concerned about my server being the
backscatterer
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:23:42 -0400 (EDT)
Gary Chambers gwch...@gwcmail.com wrote:
Jim,
What problem are you trying to solve?
Thanks for the reply.
I've been poring over the backscatterer README and from what I can
tell, my server isn't the problem.
I don't see a problem, other than
On 2011-08-05 16:22, Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 at 19:25 CEST,
Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 2011-08-02 06:30, Noel Butler wrote:
Has been a while since I've looked at this, but at present if we
need to alias a domain, eg f...@example.com to
Jim,
I don't see a problem, other than people trying to deliver email to your
MX to invalid recipients and from clients w/no rDNS. Your MX is rejecting
them.
My mail server handles a trivial amount of mail so I panicked upon seeing
the dramatic increase in log traffic. Further compounding
Running postfix on Max OS X Server 10.6. This servers only job is to relay
mail from our web servers as different domains.
A customer is saying the message envelope does not contain a domain name and
want to know if we can get that included in the message envelope. Log
reference below.
Thu Aug 4
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:24:41 -0400 (EDT)
Gary Chambers gwch...@gwcmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Thanks. Once the sick feeling in my stomach subsided and I started
seeing things a bit more clearly, I realized that I just probably had
to ride it out.
Ride it out? LOL! That's probably going to get
On 8/5/2011 2:40 PM, Ryan Buffa wrote:
Running postfix on Max OS X Server 10.6. This servers only job is to
relay mail from our web servers as different domains.
A customer is saying the message envelope does not contain a domain
name and want to know if we can get that included in the
What's the simplest way to enable smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts for
any/all clients?
On 8/5/2011 3:26 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
What's the simplest way to enable smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts for
any/all clients?
That sounds very wrong. What problem are you trying to solve?
-- Noel Jones
On 8/5/2011 6:38 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 05.08.2011 13:31, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
Multiple options:
* use a syslogd which can do filtering (syslog-ng) based on regexp
* or do it this way:
main.cf:
syslog_facility = local4
and in syslog.conf:
local4.*
29 matches
Mail list logo
