Hello Together!
Is it possible to create a pipe in master.cf that has multiple piped commands
as argument for argv e.g.:
argv=/path/command1 | /path/command2 | … | /path/commandn
or do I have to write a script for that?
Thanks in advance for an answere.
Regards,
Tom
Hello,
I would ask help about a problem with my postscreen.
I have four MX servers using postscreen with one shared memcached server.
Sometimes, a zombi already blocked by dnsbl receive a PASS NEW instead of a
reject. I can't understand why, maybe there is something wrong in my
configuration.
Marco:
Hello,
I would ask help about a problem with my postscreen.
I have four MX servers using postscreen with one shared memcached server.
You are mixing the logging from two different servers and then you
word-wrap the long lines. I don't have time to unwrap the lines and
then delete
Tom H.:
Hello Together!
Is it possible to create a pipe in master.cf that has multiple piped commands
as argument for argv e.g.:
argv=/path/command1 | /path/command2 | ? | /path/commandn
As documented, master(5) does not implement shell command syntax.
or do I have to write a
On 7/29/2012 6:57 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
Actually it is not router. It is only BPL modem. After Static IP hiring the
ISP send me an email how to configure the server with this IP addresses
information. The 10.138.9.201 internal IP address selection was not made by
myself.
Engin what
Wietse Venema wietse at porcupine.org writes:
Please show the problem without logs from other servers.
I'm sorry for word wrap and mix. This is an example:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B-09bt7bbY_0MHU4bGduZTFWeGc
Thanks again
Marco
On 07/30/2012 03:34 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Engin what country are you in? Who is your ISP?
Stan, *whois* your friend:
netname: MTRNT-NET
descr: Metronet Iletisim Teknoloji A.S.
country: TR
TR stands for Turkey. Domain registered for Engim Yılmaz from Istanbul.
I'm
Looks like Postfix violates this MUST:
The AUTH command is not permitted during a mail transaction.
An AUTH command issued during a mail transaction MUST be
rejected with a 503 reply.
mail from:
250 2.1.0 Ok
auth plain XXX
235 2.0.0 Authentication successful
Timo Sirainen:
Looks like Postfix violates this MUST:
The AUTH command is not permitted during a mail transaction.
An AUTH command issued during a mail transaction MUST be
rejected with a 503 reply.
Fixed in the new release. I see no urgent reason to update
Marco:
Wietse Venema wietse at porcupine.org writes:
Please show the problem without logs from other servers.
I'm sorry for word wrap and mix. This is an example:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B-09bt7bbY_0MHU4bGduZTFWeGc
The log below is for a connection from that started 03:46:32.
On 25/07/12 17:45, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
Short version: Is there a way to apply recipient canonical mappings (or
any other mappings that rewrite the envelope recipient) for specific
SMTP client machines in a null client/central mailhub environment?
So it seems this is really not possible? Or
Den 2012-07-30 14:34, Stan Hoeppner skrev:
Eingin, once you give us the ISP name we should be able to quickly
find
the TOS and know whether or not they allow you to host your own
outbound
mail server. Assuming the web site is in a language one of us
speaks.
I'm English only.
if this is
Andreas Ntaflos:
On 25/07/12 17:45, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
Short version: Is there a way to apply recipient canonical mappings (or
any other mappings that rewrite the envelope recipient) for specific
SMTP client machines in a null client/central mailhub environment?
So it seems this is
On 7/30/2012 8:19 AM, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
On 07/30/2012 03:34 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Engin what country are you in? Who is your ISP?
Stan, *whois* your friend:
netname: MTRNT-NET
descr: Metronet Iletisim Teknoloji A.S.
country: TR
TR stands for
Thanks Viktor. I feel like I am closer, just not quite there yet. I am
now getting the following error:
mail for 1.1.1.1 loops back to myself
main.cf:
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps =
hash:/etc/postfix/sender_dependent_default_transport_maps
master.cf:
1.1.1.1:smtp inetn
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:57:10PM -0500, Russell Jones wrote:
Thanks Viktor. I feel like I am closer, just not quite there yet. I
am now getting the following error:
mail for 1.1.1.1 loops back to myself
main.cf:
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps =
Thank you for the delightful insight. I thought I was pretty clear in
what I was attempting to do in my first email:
I have a simple postfix 2.9.3 server with 2 IP addresses. I want all
mail sent from a sender address of *@example1 to go through 1.1.1.1, and
all mail sent from a sender
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:33:40PM -0500, Russell Jones wrote:
I have a simple postfix 2.9.3 server with 2 IP addresses. I want
all mail sent from a sender address of *@example1 to go through
1.1.1.1, and all mail sent from a sender address of *@example2.com
to go through 1.1.1.2.
What does
What does go through mean?
The source IP is defined based on the sender's domain. This is what I
need to achieve: Recently there have been requests for sending mail
with source IP addresses that depend on the envelope sender.
Some clarification, I'm not asking you (or anyone) to write my configs
for me, but to just point me in some sort of direction that has some
working examples I could pick up off of the postfix documentation
has some nice examples and tutorials for all sort of things, just
nothing for this
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:56:05PM -0500, Russell Jones wrote:
The source IP is defined based on the sender's domain. This is what
I need to achieve: Recently there have been requests for sending
mail with source IP addresses that depend on the envelope sender.
Thanks Viktor, the examples helped considerably. I now have it working
as intended :)
Hopefully this thread will help others in the future that may have
issues too.
On 7/31/2012 12:21 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:56:05PM -0500, Russell Jones wrote:
The source
22 matches
Mail list logo
