RE: Too much traffic

2013-04-02 Thread Ceyhun Ganioglu
Hi Fernando, Thanks for your response. This is exactly the case. I cleaned the mail queue last night and disabled one of the Drupal installations which seems vulnarable to me. Since last night there are no new emails sent. Which is good. Thank you for your help. Regards From: Fernando M

Re: Too much traffic

2013-04-02 Thread KSB
On 2013.04.03. 2:38, Fernando Maior wrote: Ceyhun, It is not a problem with Postfix. Proceed looking for someone or some process that is forwarding those e-mails to your postfix server. Your postfix server is just receiving them from internal clients and putting them into the queue to send it ou

Re: Too much traffic

2013-04-02 Thread Fernando Maior
Ceyhun, It is not a problem with Postfix. Proceed looking for someone or some process that is forwarding those e-mails to your postfix server. Your postfix server is just receiving them from internal clients and putting them into the queue to send it out. Bye, --- Fernando Maciel Souto Maior On

Re: Too much traffic

2013-04-02 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2013-04-03 Ceyhun Ganioglu wrote: > The problem is it is not a single mail sending problem. There were 756 > email to be sent to za...@likya.com on the queue. I cleaned the queue. > Then the emails appeared again. Something in my email server or maybe > a content management system on my web serv

RE: Too much traffic

2013-04-02 Thread Ceyhun Ganioglu
Hi Fernando, Thanks for your reply. The problem is it is not a single mail sending problem. There were 756 email to be sent to za...@likya.com on the queue. I cleaned the queue. Then the emails appeared again. Something in my email server or maybe a content management system on my web server si

Re: md5sum of source file

2013-04-02 Thread Wietse Venema
Robert Lopez: > Wietse, No I did not! Now I have. Thanks. > > Is this sufficient to know all is ok: > > # gpg --verify postfix-2.10.0.tar.gz.sig postfix-2.10.0.tar.gz > gpg: Signature made Mon 11 Feb 2013 09:19:00 AM MST using RSA key ID > C12BCD99 > gpg: Good signature from "Wietse Venema " > g

Re: md5sum of source file

2013-04-02 Thread Robert Lopez
Wietse, No I did not! Now I have. Thanks. Is this sufficient to know all is ok: # gpg --verify postfix-2.10.0.tar.gz.sig postfix-2.10.0.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Mon 11 Feb 2013 09:19:00 AM MST using RSA key ID C12BCD99 gpg: Good signature from "Wietse Venema " gpg: WARNING: This key is not cer

Re: Too much traffic

2013-04-02 Thread John Peach
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:25:09 -0300 Fernando Maior wrote: > Hi, > > I am not an specialist in Postfix, just a common admin. Yet, I can > see two things from your message: > >1. You sure have a DNS resolution problem. No external server > should be resolved to 192.168.x.x, that is an internal

Re: Forward internal RHEL6 server local user emails to postfix mailrelay

2013-04-02 Thread Fernando Maior
Hi, I would use transport maps. Just look at the /etc/postfix/transport file, there are instructions about how to config it. You may also need to change /etc/postfix/main.cf to activate the transport map. Try using these lines at the end of transport. example.com smtp:bar.example:25 .exampl

Re: Too much traffic

2013-04-02 Thread Fernando Maior
Hi, I am not an specialist in Postfix, just a common admin. Yet, I can see two things from your message: 1. You sure have a DNS resolution problem. No external server should be resolved to 192.168.x.x, that is an internal network. Also, the last two octets (255.255) are almost allways us

Re: Strange bounce message

2013-04-02 Thread Roland De Leper
Hi wietse, Thanks for your support. I know what to do now. Regards, Roland de lepper Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad Op 2 apr. 2013 om 15:53 heeft Wietse Venema het volgende geschreven: > In your second bounce message example, at the end of the DATA > command, the bounce message shows that server

Re: Strange bounce message

2013-04-02 Thread Wietse Venema
In your second bounce message example, at the end of the DATA command, the bounce message shows that server and client are out of step. LINE BREAK HERE : host 129.50.20.41[129.50.20.41] said:* 552 5.2.2 r.beer...@example.com Quota Exceeded (in reply to end of DATA command) LINE BREAK

Re: Strange bounce message

2013-04-02 Thread Wietse Venema
Roland de Lepper: > This is the mail system at host webaccess.brabantia.com.I'm sorry to have > to inform you that your message could notbe delivered to one or more > recipients. It's attached below.For further assistance, please send mail to > postmaster.If you do so, please include this problem r

Re: Backup Mailserver -Secondary MX server

2013-04-02 Thread Wietse Venema
John Hinton: > My goal is to have a Postfix mailserver set up to accept mail for other > Postfix servers running multiple domains 'if and only if they are not > accessible'. What's missing from this picture that not only hosts can fail, but also networks. Network outages happen all the time in