Good morning everyone :)
Do you guys know of a tool that will act like pflogsumm, only based on
domain and graphical?
Regards,
Muzaffer Tolga Özses to...@ozses.net wrote:
Good morning everyone :)
Do you guys know of a tool that will act like pflogsumm, only based on
domain and graphical?
Regards,
Hi,
take a look at modoboa (http://modoboa.org/). It supports per-domain graphical
stats using RRDtool.
Antoine
On 04/04/2013 10:30 AM, Antoine Nguyen wrote:
Muzaffer Tolga Özses to...@ozses.net wrote:
Good morning everyone :)
Do you guys know of a tool that will act like pflogsumm, only based on
domain and graphical?
Regards,
Hi,
take a look at modoboa (http://modoboa.org/). It supports per-domain
On 23/1/2013 3:43 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Interestingly, at first I tried it but it didn't seem to produce any
output at all (I had to break with Ctrl-C):
# postmap -s /var/lib/postfix/verify_cache
^C
# postmap -s btree:/var/lib/postfix/verify_cache
^C
# postmap -q u...@example.com
Am 2013-04-04 10:12, schrieb Muzaffer Tolga Özses:
On 04/04/2013 10:30 AM, Antoine Nguyen wrote:
Muzaffer Tolga Özses to...@ozses.net wrote:
Good morning everyone :)
Do you guys know of a tool that will act like pflogsumm, only based
on
domain and graphical?
Regards,
Hi,
take a look
Nikolaos Milas:
On 23/1/2013 3:43 ??, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Interestingly, at first I tried it but it didn't seem to produce any
output at all (I had to break with Ctrl-C):
# postmap -s /var/lib/postfix/verify_cache
^C
# postmap -s btree:/var/lib/postfix/verify_cache
^C
#
On 4/4/2013 3:38 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
# cp /var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db tempfile.db
# postmap -s btree:tempfile.db
Thanks Wietse, it works fine this way:
# postmap -s btree:verify_cache_copy
By the way, is there a way/command to lengthen the validity of all
current
Nikolaos Milas:
On 4/4/2013 3:38 ??, Wietse Venema wrote:
# cp /var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db tempfile.db
# postmap -s btree:tempfile.db
Thanks Wietse, it works fine this way:
# postmap -s btree:verify_cache_copy
By the way, is there a way/command to lengthen the
grarpamp wrote:
I've done - (qmail) to + (postfix) hurriedly in the past to avoid a
meta issue. Other users migration or dual uses aside, with that
one I wanted to but did not have benefit to research whether
+ or - had better merits. Such as which is in more common use now,
which is trending
Kris Deugau:
grarpamp wrote:
I've done - (qmail) to + (postfix) hurriedly in the past to avoid a
meta issue. Other users migration or dual uses aside, with that
one I wanted to but did not have benefit to research whether
+ or - had better merits. Such as which is in more common use now,
Wietse Venema:
Kris Deugau:
grarpamp wrote:
I've done - (qmail) to + (postfix) hurriedly in the past to avoid a
meta issue. Other users migration or dual uses aside, with that
one I wanted to but did not have benefit to research whether
+ or - had better merits. Such as which is in
On 2013-04-01 10:21 AM, Kajetan Dolinar dolinar.kaje...@gmail.com wrote:
By a detailed and systematic search into my main.cf http://main.cf,
I have found out that I had a stale alias_maps setting somewhere in
the bushes amidst the comments and other settings. The first setting
in the file was
Am 04.04.2013 20:35, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2013-04-01 10:21 AM, Kajetan Dolinar dolinar.kaje...@gmail.com wrote:
By a detailed and systematic search into my main.cf http://main.cf, I have
found out that I had a stale
alias_maps setting somewhere in the bushes amidst the comments and
On 4/4/2013 5:42 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
How long is your expected downtime? Even it someone receives only
one email per week, they should expire in 24 days.
It will be around 5-6 hours. I would like to avoid the gateway server
bouncing mails due to not being able to verify the recipients.
Charles Marcus:
On 2013-04-01 10:21 AM, Kajetan Dolinar dolinar.kaje...@gmail.com wrote:
By a detailed and systematic search into my main.cf http://main.cf,
I have found out that I had a stale alias_maps setting somewhere in
the bushes amidst the comments and other settings. The first
Nikolaos Milas:
On 4/4/2013 5:42 ??, Wietse Venema wrote:
How long is your expected downtime? Even it someone receives only
one email per week, they should expire in 24 days.
It will be around 5-6 hours. I would like to avoid the gateway server
bouncing mails due to not being able to
On 4/4/2013 11:06 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
You weren't paying attention when i explained automatic cache refresh.
I admit I was confused with the initial explanation.
Your latest clarifications make things much clearer to me.
I understand that the gateway server should work fine with the
I've done a proof-of-concept implementation that works as documented
below the signature.
This retains the old recipient_delimiter parameter because that
parameter has been in use since 19981029 in the forward_path default
parameter value, and I can't have a multi-character value there.
To
18 matches
Mail list logo
