On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:36:48PM +0200, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
Make sure your ISP supports reverse DNS for IPv6, either by request or
by delegating it to you. If you cannot get this sorted yet, I would
recommend simply postponing IPv6 rollout for your MX for now, until
your ISP finally
Am 08.10.2013 07:44, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
I've removed the script, I stopped ftp (it seems it was ftp'd)
at the time I've posted, I was on a 4 mobile, and, I was looking for a
stop gap measure to 'stop further damage' from that point
Understood. For a more permanent solution to this
Hi,
I am trying to block few / selected users from sending mails outside of
domain where as other users should be allowed to send mails anywhere. I have
followed postfix official documentation of Restricting what users can send
mail to off-site destinations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_sender_access
Are you using Postfix =2.10? If so, have you tried smtpd_relay_access?
Cheers,
Nik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid
On 2013.10.08 09:16:11 +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
i never allowed any webserver in the past 10 years to
use the sendmail binary for a lot of reasons like header
injections and so on
Good, but possibly would not have helped. For me it looks obvious like
'Stealrat' which opens a socket
Am 08.10.2013 11:32, schrieb Manuel Bieling:
On 2013.10.08 09:16:11 +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
i never allowed any webserver in the past 10 years to
use the sendmail binary for a lot of reasons like header
injections and so on
Good, but possibly would not have helped. For me it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_sender_access
Are you using Postfix =2.10? If so, have you tried smtpd_relay_access?
smtpd_relay_restrictions,
Mail from our system wasn't accepted oftentimes by Google either.
I discovered the following solution: Our mail server has got two IPv6
addresses in the open Internet, one is specific, the other one
automatically created. The first one was in the DNS, the second one not.
I noticed that many
Hi Nik,
Thanks for quick reply, yes the postfix version is 2.6 :
[root@posttestbox postfix]# postconf -d mail_version
mail_version = 2.6.6
Here is how I tried the suggestion in main.cf :
smtpd_relay_restrictions = localonly
localonly = check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/localdomains,
On 10/08/2013 11:16 PM, postfix wrote:
Mail from our system wasn't accepted oftentimes by Google either.
I discovered the following solution: Our mail server has got two IPv6
addresses in the open Internet, one is specific, the other one
automatically created. The first one was in the DNS, the
On 2013-10-08 6:27 AM, virtualpostfix rathodsur...@gmail.com wrote:
[root@posttestbox postfix]# postconf -d mail_version
mail_version = 2.6.6
?
2.6 is NOT = 2.10
--
Best regards,
*/Charles/*
ohh lol yes! right Charles.
Uhh I guess this issue is taking away my head.
Thanks Charles.
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/restricting-few-users-from-sending-mails-outside-domain-mymailsystem-com-tp61996p62005.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing
postfix:
Mail from our system wasn't accepted oftentimes by Google either.
I discovered the following solution: Our mail server has got two IPv6
addresses in the open Internet, one is specific, the other one
automatically created. The first one was in the DNS, the second one not.
I noticed
Good afternoon,
I've started to runnning postfwd2 on my server, with aproximately
up to 500 mails daily (and 80% spams :) ). I plan to use it to a
domain with 30 000 daily emails. Does anybody have postfwd2 applied
for similar domain ? What about huge dns count for RBL ?
Thanks and
I ran into this problem a little while ago.
I found that the problem was the Postfix binds to a port (25) for
sending, Linux links that port to an IP when needed. This means that the
address may change each time a send is initiated (This is my imperfect
understanding of things).
To make sure
Wietse Venema:
postfix:
Mail from our system wasn't accepted oftentimes by Google either.
I discovered the following solution: Our mail server has got two IPv6
addresses in the open Internet, one is specific, the other one
automatically created. The first one was in the DNS, the second
Hi,
I have postfix+amavisd-new installed.
My amavis related part of master.cf like following:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
...
smtp-amavis unix - -
Oleksii Krykun:
If user requests return receipt he receive delivery report about amavis only.
This is the mail system at host xxx.
Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s) listed below.
If the message was delivered to mailbox you will receive no further
On 10/08/2013 01:44 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Understood. For a more permanent solution to this script problem, you
may want to consider locking down or disabling the pickup service, and
configuring all web applications and MUAs to use the submission service
with auth. This will prevent
Am 08.10.2013 15:16, schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
On 10/08/2013 01:44 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Understood. For a more permanent solution to this script problem, you
may want to consider locking down or disabling the pickup service, and
configuring all web applications and MUAs to use the
On 10/8/2013 6:26 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
postfix:
Mail from our system wasn't accepted oftentimes by Google either.
I discovered the following solution: Our mail server has got two IPv6
addresses in the open Internet, one is specific, the other one
automatically created.
On 10/8/2013 5:27 AM, virtualpostfix wrote:
Hi Nik,
Thanks for quick reply, yes the postfix version is 2.6 :
[root@posttestbox postfix]# postconf -d mail_version
mail_version = 2.6.6
Here is how I tried the suggestion in main.cf :
smtpd_relay_restrictions = localonly
localonly =
Ohh GREAT Noel! that sorted the issue out ..
I was using roundcube to test this but once you specified that its using
sendmail instead of smtp it clicked the right button, roundcube by default
uses available mta and do not look for smtp auth. I have adjusted roundcube
to go for smtp and it
Can someone add some clarification to this setting:
smtpd_client_message_rate_limitThe number of
messages and advisor would be able to send in a 5 minute period
Does the counter count each unique postfix id assigned to a message or does it
count to each recipient?
For example, if I submit one
Thomas Moretto:
Can someone add some clarification to this setting:
smtpd_client_message_rate_limitThe number of
messages and advisor would be able to send in a 5 minute period
Does the counter count each unique postfix id assigned to a message
or does it count to each recipient?
As
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
wie...@porcupine.org schrieb:
Thomas Moretto:
Can someone add some clarification to this setting:
smtpd_client_message_rate_limitThe number of
messages and advisor would be able to send in a 5 minute period
Does the counter count each unique
Correct, the last paragraph is the real question:
For example, if I submit one message with the id of 09AE3ZBX addressed 100
different recipients does postfix count that as 1 message submitted or 100?
which I have interpreted from everything i have read and the response i got
from the email is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On a side note: Stop the threadjacking.
Thanks!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid
iQFNBAEBCgA3BQJSVFIPMBxEb21pbmlrIEdlb3JnZSAobW9iaWxlIGtleSkgPG5p
a0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlPgAKCRAvLbGk0zMOJaolB/9PgX5yhulip3+5JQFBqAHP
On Tue, October 8, 2013 4:44 pm, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/7/2013 11:19 PM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
there was a php script uploaded and called
I've removed the script, I stopped ftp (it seems it was ftp'd)
at the time I've posted, I was on a 4 mobile, and, I was looking for a
stop gap
I've started to runnning postfwd2 on my server, with aproximately
up to 500 mails daily (and 80% spams :) ). I plan to use it to a
domain with 30 000 daily emails. Does anybody have postfwd2 applied
for similar domain ? What about huge dns count for RBL ?
I use it since years with
On 10/8/2013 3:08 PM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
On Tue, October 8, 2013 4:44 pm, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
...
Understood. For a more permanent solution to this script problem, you
may want to consider locking down or disabling the pickup service, and
configuring all web applications and MUAs to use
On Wed, October 9, 2013 10:41 am, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/8/2013 3:08 PM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
Stan, Michael and other who responded, thanks
Others responded with some good ideas here, mostly locking down PHP
itself so it can't use the sendmail binary. But it sounds like this is a
On 10/8/2013 7:15 PM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
On Wed, October 9, 2013 10:41 am, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/8/2013 3:08 PM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
Stan, Michael and other who responded, thanks
Others responded with some good ideas here, mostly locking down PHP
itself so it can't use the
33 matches
Mail list logo
