I have a low usage 'workgroup' 'mini mail list' with a virtual alias that
sends email to 8 or 10 addresses (on other servers), that works well. No
changes have been made to target emails for several month, all's good.
today I've received two "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender"
From: "Mail Deli
On 10/10/2013 2:17 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> I suspect either it's just a mistake, or stuff that actually used that
>> domain in a URL (as opposed to just a random string in a message)q has
>> been really spammy.
>
> I asked. There really is a domain master.cf,
> and it really is used
> in URLs
On Fri, October 11, 2013 10:49 am, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> On Fri, October 11, 2013 4:56 am, Robert L Mathews wrote:
>> There are several Windows PC viruses, including the common "Gumblar"
>> family, that steal saved FTP passwords from files on the computer. They
> thanks for explanation, that
On Fri, October 11, 2013 4:56 am, Robert L Mathews wrote:
> On 10/8/13 5:15 PM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> There are several Windows PC viruses, including the common "Gumblar"
> family, that steal saved FTP passwords from files on the computer.
> They simply have a list of file locations where vari
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:17:12PM -, John Levine wrote:
> >I suspect either it's just a mistake, or stuff that actually
> >used that domain in a URL (as opposed to just a random string
> >in a message)q has been really spammy.
>
> I asked. There really is a domain master.cf, and it really is
>I suspect either it's just a mistake, or stuff that actually used that
>domain in a URL (as opposed to just a random string in a message)q has
>been really spammy.
I asked. There really is a domain master.cf, and it really is used
in URLs in a lot of spam.
Solution: don't look up strings in the
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:20:40PM -0400, micah wrote:
> For the purposes of better scaling things out, I would prefer to
> maintain a table of certificate fingerprints that I want to deny, rather
> than a table of certificates that I want to allow.
You might think so, but you probably have not f
>> Content inspection is evil by-design and doomed to fail. This is just
>> another example.
Unfortunately, there's no alternative unless your users don't care
about getting mail from large providers with the occasional spam
infestation.
I suspect either it's just a mistake, or stuff that actuall
For the purposes of better scaling things out, I would prefer to
maintain a table of certificate fingerprints that I want to deny, rather
than a table of certificates that I want to allow. Such a table would
need to be updated a small fraction of the time that an allow list would
need to be update
On 10/8/13 5:15 PM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> I'm still perplexed with access: the user claims no one else had ftp
> password, ftp password was a random 8-char alpha/numeric string,
> can there be any other reason that leaked password...?
There are several Windows PC viruses, including the common
On 10.10.2013, at 14:55, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> <***@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4001:c02::1a]
>said: 550-5.7.1 [2a01:4f8:d16:4114:feed:1bad:beef:dead 1] Our
> system
>has 550-5.7.1 detected an unusual rate of unsolicited mail
> originating from
>you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wietse Venema said the following on 10/10/2013 02:24:
>> Not sure if that's what you mean but a quick check of main.cf in the
>> postfix 2.10.2 RPM for F19 and postfix 2.6.6 RPM for CentOS 6.4 shows:
>>
>> # Enable IPv4, and IPv6 if supported inet_p
Andreas Herrmann:
> <***@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4001:c02::1a]
> said: 550-5.7.1 [2a01:4f8:d16:4114:feed:1bad:beef:dead 1] Our
> system
> has 550-5.7.1 detected an unusual rate of unsolicited mail
> originating from
> your IP 550-5.7.1 address [...]
>
Hi there,
On 10/01/13 07:07, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> <{google_recipient}>: host aspmx.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4001:c02::1b] said:
> 550-5.7.1 [2a01:4f8:d16:2409::badd:ecaf 1] Our system has detected
> an
> 550-5.7.1 unusual rate of unsolicited mail originating from your IP
> address.
Andreas Ziegler:
> Hi,
>
> a postfix server that is listening on more than IP - each for another
> internal service - is sending them out to the recipients using one
> specific IP.
> Is it possible to specify, that mails coming in on IP 1.2.3.4 have to
> use another outgoing IP than mails coming i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 10.10.2013 12:06, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 10/10/2013 4:30 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>>
>> Zitat von Daniele Nicolodi :
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> recently I've see some emails from the postfix mailing list
>>> being marked as possible spam by
On 10/10/2013 4:30 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>
> Zitat von Daniele Nicolodi :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> recently I've see some emails from the postfix mailing list being marked
>> as possible spam by Spamassassin. Investigating which rule caused the
>> problem I found that dbl.spamhaus.org started
Zitat von Daniele Nicolodi :
Hello,
recently I've see some emails from the postfix mailing list being marked
as possible spam by Spamassassin. Investigating which rule caused the
problem I found that dbl.spamhaus.org started to list master.cf as a
"bad" hostname. Mails directed to the postfi
Hello,
recently I've see some emails from the postfix mailing list being marked
as possible spam by Spamassassin. Investigating which rule caused the
problem I found that dbl.spamhaus.org started to list master.cf as a
"bad" hostname. Mails directed to the postfix list of course contain
the stri
08.10.2013 15:42, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
>Oleksii Krykun:
> > If user requests return receipt he receive delivery report about amavis
> > only.
> >
> > This is the mail system at host xxx.
> >
> > Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s) listed below.
> > If
Am 10.10.2013 10:20, schrieb Andreas Ziegler:
> a postfix server that is listening on more than IP - each for another
> internal service - is sending them out to the recipients using one
> specific IP.
> Is it possible to specify, that mails coming in on IP 1.2.3.4 have to
> use another outgoing
Hi,
a postfix server that is listening on more than IP - each for another
internal service - is sending them out to the recipients using one
specific IP.
Is it possible to specify, that mails coming in on IP 1.2.3.4 have to
use another outgoing IP than mails coming in on other IPs?
I know it is po
22 matches
Mail list logo
