Postfix Spamassassin and always_bcc

2014-03-06 Thread pappin
Hello, Could anyone please help with a Postfix/Spamassassin configuration problem. I have a small debian wheezy server running Fetchmail 6.3.21-4, Postfix 2.9.6-2 Spamassassin 3.3.2-5. I have set the always_bcc in the main.cf as below and this works fine without spamassassin. With spamassassin

Re: Postfix Spamassassin and always_bcc

2014-03-06 Thread Wietse Venema
pappin: Hello, Could anyone please help with a Postfix/Spamassassin configuration problem. I have a small debian wheezy server running Fetchmail 6.3.21-4, Postfix 2.9.6-2 Spamassassin 3.3.2-5. I have set the always_bcc in the main.cf as below and this works fine without spamassassin.

Re: Postfix Spamassassin and always_bcc

2014-03-06 Thread pappin
Thanks very much for the prompt reply. I tried as you suggested smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o content_filter=spamassassin -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings I am now getting an error in my email log postfix/qmgr[7975]: warning: connect to

Re: Compromised Passwords

2014-03-06 Thread Adam Moffett
Homer: Two steps eliminated this problem for us: 1) Accounts with more than 6 failed login attempts in a 10 minute period are disabled for 10 minutes. This makes brute force methods to find passwords almost impossible. 2) Limit to 200 outgoing messages per day per user. We'll raise it to

Re: Postfix Spamassassin and always_bcc

2014-03-06 Thread Wietse Venema
pappin: Thanks very much for the prompt reply. I tried as you suggested smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o content_filter=spamassassin -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings I am now getting an error in my email log postfix/qmgr[7975]:

maillog says Service unavailable, bounce msg claims bad addr

2014-03-06 Thread Jay G. Scott
The maillog says this, and I believe it: Mar 5 08:22:02 ns5.arlut.utexas.edu sendmail[5427]: s25EM0Zg005419: to=u...@xxx-.com, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=1081946, relay=ns2.arlut.utexas.edu. [146.6.211.1], dsn=5.1.3, stat=Service unavailable But the user's bounce

Re: maillog says Service unavailable, bounce msg claims bad addr

2014-03-06 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/6/2014 11:08 AM, Jay G. Scott wrote: The maillog says this, and I believe it: Mar 5 08:22:02 ns5.arlut.utexas.edu sendmail[5427]: s25EM0Zg005419: to=u...@xxx-.com, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=1081946, relay=ns2.arlut.utexas.edu. [146.6.211.1], dsn=5.1.3,

Re: Compromised Passwords

2014-03-06 Thread DTNX Postmaster
On 06 Mar 2014, at 18:04, Adam Moffett adamli...@plexicomm.net wrote: Two steps eliminated this problem for us: 1) Accounts with more than 6 failed login attempts in a 10 minute period are disabled for 10 minutes. This makes brute force methods to find passwords almost impossible. 2)

Re: Postfix Spamassassin and always_bcc

2014-03-06 Thread pappin
You were quite right - typo !! - all working now - thanks very much. pappin -- View this message in context: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Spamassassin-and-always-bcc-tp65835p65844.html Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Compromised Passwords

2014-03-06 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 06.03.2014 18:04, schrieb Adam Moffett: Two steps eliminated this problem for us: 1) Accounts with more than 6 failed login attempts in a 10 minute period are disabled for 10 minutes. This makes brute force methods to find passwords almost impossible. that is fine 2) Limit to 200

Problems with sasl auth, and tls (secured flag)

2014-03-06 Thread Nathan Coulson
I wanted users to have the choice between connecting via TLS or not. By default, users would require TLS unless they choose otherwise. There is an existing userbase where some users use SSL/TLS, and others do not. We use dovecot for authentication. The auth protocol as mentioned at

Re: Problems with sasl auth, and tls (secured flag)

2014-03-06 Thread Wietse Venema
Nathan Coulson: In testing, we were seeing the following results: smtpd_tls_security_level=may AUTH#0111#011PLAIN#011service=smtp#011nologin#011lip=1.6.0.5#011rip=1.6.41.1#011resp= smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt

Re: Problems with sasl auth, and tls (secured flag)

2014-03-06 Thread Nathan Coulson
On 14-03-06 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Nathan Coulson: In testing, we were seeing the following results: smtpd_tls_security_level=may AUTH#0111#011PLAIN#011service=smtp#011nologin#011lip=1.6.0.5#011rip=1.6.41.1#011resp= smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt

Re: Problems with sasl auth, and tls (secured flag)

2014-03-06 Thread Wietse Venema
The source code does not lie. I suppose someone down-stream improved it. Wietse

Re: Problems with sasl auth, and tls (secured flag)

2014-03-06 Thread Nathan Coulson
On 14-03-06 12:15 PM, Nathan Coulson wrote: On 14-03-06 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Nathan Coulson: In testing, we were seeing the following results: smtpd_tls_security_level=may AUTH#0111#011PLAIN#011service=smtp#011nologin#011lip=1.6.0.5#011rip=1.6.41.1#011resp=