On 06/01/2014 12:24 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:11:42AM +0300, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic wrote:
I am blocking executables and potentially dangerous extensions with
header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
Inside header_checks.pcre I have:
Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic skrev den 2014-06-01 07:11
Wietse Venema:
LaMont Jones:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:33:08AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix snapshot 20140530 now supports dynamically-loadable database
plugins, and Postfix shared libraries.
The Postfix build/installation procedure has changed a bit, but
there should be
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic
t...@inteq.ro wrote:
Hello
Tonight, while checking Postfix config, I have stumbled upon something
weird.
I am blocking executables and potentially dangerous extensions with
header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 02:52:44AM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
I'm not really familiar with the usage of pcre with postfix, but
[...]
Therefore, you should not be adding to the OP's confusion.
--
Viktor.
Perhaps you can clear up the confusion here. You know everything and can
speak for the OP.
I merely pointed him down one possible path, did what I could to illuminate
it without , and then left the rest to him.
On Jun 2, 2014 4:18 AM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
wrote:
On Mon,
On Jun 2, 2014 4:18 AM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 02:52:44AM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
I'm not really familiar with the usage of pcre with postfix, but
[...]
Therefore, you should not be adding to the OP's confusion.
Perhaps you can
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:54:48AM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
I merely pointed him down one possible path, did what I could to illuminate
it without , and then left the rest to him.
s/down one possible path/up the garden path/
--
Viktor.
Hello Viktor,
I admit, I am not a guru in Postfix but I am trying.
I do not understand where the confusion is?
Using both my examples (mime_header_checks and header_checks), my executable
(.bat) is blocked when I send a test email from Outlook with the correct
REJECT text.
But, when testing from
Hi All,
We run a postfix STMP relay for customers. One customer is saying that
their application is showing lots of timeouts on their end when it is
trying to send emails via our STMP relay. We are also seeing the timeout
errors in the mail log (shown below).
How do I troubleshoot something
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:22:14AM +0300, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic wrote:
I admit, I am not a guru in Postfix but I am trying.
I do not understand where the confusion is?
The patterns in header_checks need to be identical to the patterns
in mime_header_checks. Usually, one simply has:
Am 02.06.2014 00:35, schrieb tswmmeejsdad .:
We run a postfix STMP relay for customers. One customer is saying that their
application is showing lots of
timeouts on their end when it is trying to send emails via our STMP relay. We
are also seeing the timeout errors in
the mail log (shown
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 08:35:25AM +1000, tswmmeejsdad . wrote:
May 19 16:06:50 smtp01 postfix/smtpd[21940]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE
from unknown[10.84.72.227]
The SMTP client neither closes the TCP socket nor sends QUIT after
completing a message delivery. Fix the client.
--
Thanks for the info Viktor. That sounds like a rather bold statement and I
don't think customers at times are willing to concede that it's something
on their end causing it.
Is there anything else that we could do further to prove to the customer
that it was their application that as you have
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:26:47AM +1000, tswmmeejsdad . wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 08:35:25AM +1000, tswmmeejsdad . wrote:
May 19 16:06:50 smtp01 postfix/smtpd[21940]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE
I have users who have virtual domains on my server. They both use them for web
sites and email. A little while ago, postfix stopped sending email. One of them
can send mail from his office to me, and can receive from anywhere. But he
can't send anywhere outside my domain.
The other one seems
Hi Viktor,
Terrific advice. Much appreciated.
Cheers.
Andy
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:26:47AM +1000, tswmmeejsdad . wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 07:56:17PM -0600, Glenn English wrote:
debug_peer_level = 5
Drop this down to 2, so you'll actually be able to see useful
logging, rather than low-level noise.
debug_peer_list = bouldermedicaladvocate.com aerco.net
mydestination =
localhost, localdomain,
On 6/1/2014 1:52 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic
t...@inteq.ro wrote:
Hello
Tonight, while checking Postfix config, I have stumbled upon something
weird.
I am blocking executables and potentially dangerous extensions with
On 6/1/2014 4:22 PM, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic wrote:
Hello Viktor,
I admit, I am not a guru in Postfix but I am trying.
I do not understand where the confusion is?
Using both my examples (mime_header_checks and header_checks), my executable
(.bat) is blocked when I send a test email
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 6/1/2014 1:52 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic
t...@inteq.ro wrote:
Hello
Tonight, while checking Postfix config, I have stumbled upon something
weird.
On Jun 1, 2014, at 8:39 PM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
Thanks a lot, Victor, for looking through that mess of a config. I was in a bit
of an anxiety attack when I wrote the original message.
I've changed 'most everything you suggested (a lot of them were that way before
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:57:30PM -0600, Glenn English wrote:
Postfix seems happy with a domain name in mynetworks. I put IPs
in there earlier and it didn't seem to work, but the domain names
did -- I found how to fix my problem with an ASCII domain name in
the config.
Apparently happy or
23 matches
Mail list logo
