Hello,
I need to configure a second MTA on the same server.
You can tell that this does not make sense but this is a workaround for one
issue i have.
Postfix listen on port 225 and another MTA on port 25.
postfix has transport_maps enabled
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
*
About 95% of the rejections/blocked from postscreen show up as “blocked by
zen.spamhaus.org” in the logs even though I have several other RBLs checked by
postscreen. Almost all the ones that are not listing zen, are listing the DUL
list, and the rest are listing “dnsbl.sorbs.net” (without a
--On Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:23 AM -0600 LuKreme
krem...@kreme.com wrote:
About 95% of the rejections/blocked from postscreen show up as blocked
by zen.spamhaus.org in the logs even though I have several other RBLs
checked by postscreen.
RBL rejections are generally done in order
LuKreme:
How does post screen decide which RBL to list in the log?
It blames the DNSBL with the largest weight.
The initial postscreen implementation blamed the DNSBL that replied
first. That was considered misleading, especially when that DNSBL
contributed very little to the total score.
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:23 AM -0600 LuKreme
krem...@kreme.com wrote:
About 95% of the rejections/blocked from postscreen show up as blocked
by zen.spamhaus.org in the logs even though I have several other RBLs
checked by postscreen.
RBL rejections
Konstantin:
Hello,
I need to configure a second MTA on the same server.
You can tell that this does not make sense but this is a workaround for one
issue i have.
Postfix listen on port 225 and another MTA on port 25.
postfix has transport_maps enabled
transport_maps =
On 04 Sep 2014, at 10:44 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
LuKreme:
How does post screen decide which RBL to list in the log?
It blames the DNSBL with the largest weight.
The initial postscreen implementation blamed the DNSBL that replied
first. That was considered misleading,
--On Thursday, September 04, 2014 1:47 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
postscreen queries DNS[BW]Ls in parallel. The blame is based on the
DNSBL weight, as described in my other follow-up.
Ah, sorry, I should have noticed postscreen vs postfix. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah
LuKreme:
On 04 Sep 2014, at 10:44 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
LuKreme:
How does post screen decide which RBL to list in the log?
It blames the DNSBL with the largest weight.
The initial postscreen implementation blamed the DNSBL that replied
first. That was
Lately, I'm seeing a lot more of this from some servers:
postfix/cleanup[20330]: [ID 947731 mail.warning]
warning: mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_list_resend.cf lookup error for
[...]
postfix/cleanup[20330]: [ID 947731 mail.warning]
warning: 6D0D222182: virtual_alias_maps map lookup
Am 04.09.2014 um 18:23 schrieb LuKreme:
dwl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[2;3]*-3
swl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[12;13]*-3
AFAIR someone posted a few months ago that those lists are empty. Has
that changed?
--
Alex JOST
Ricardo Signes:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
Lately, I'm seeing a lot more of this from some servers:
postfix/cleanup[20330]: [ID 947731 mail.warning]
warning: mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_list_resend.cf lookup error for
[...]
Wietse Venema:
If there is no logfile record with:
warning: mysql query failed: [text from mysql_error() here]
then either your syslog daemon lost that record,
Yes.
or there was an
error while searching the etc/postfix/mysql_list_resend.cf domains
patterns and that error wasn't
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org [2014-09-04T15:55:07]
Wietse Venema:
If there is no logfile record with:
warning: mysql query failed: [text from mysql_error() here]
then either your syslog daemon lost that record,
Yes.
Thanks. I'll look harder, but this has happened
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org [2014-09-04T15:55:07]
No. All match_list errors are logged with the match_error() function.
First, let me note that I'm running 2.10.2.
Here are all the syslog entries for cleanup for the last half hour on one host
that's been having this problem.
tl;dr: 32
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:40:09PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
$ dig +cd +dnssec +noall +comment +ans +auth -t tlsa
fail.mail2.clarion-hotels.cz
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63426
;; flags: qr rd ra cd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 6,
One of my customers is receiving a huge amount of very specific spam not
blocked by my regular postfix's spam control rules:
The spam is coming from several ip addresses.
All mails have this client:
X-Mail-Agent: BSMTP DLL Feb 11 2001 by Tatsuo Baba
Which would be the best way to block it?
17 matches
Mail list logo