On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:12:38PM -0700, Den wrote:
I was just wondering what exactly does the line below do? Could anybody
comment / advise, please? It does not actually check and *confirm* that the
code, syntax, etc. of any regexp present in /filter/ (example) is 100%
correct does it?
On 12 Sep 2014, at 13:55 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 12.09.2014 um 21:49 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
However, any time I connect via telnet to this server and specify
*any* IP address in the form [X.X.X.X], the smtpd_helo_restrictions
won't trigger.
This is both legal and reasonable.
it
Am 13.09.2014 um 15:10 schrieb LuKreme:
On 12 Sep 2014, at 13:55 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 12.09.2014 um 21:49 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
However, any time I connect via telnet to this server and specify
*any* IP address in the form [X.X.X.X], the smtpd_helo_restrictions
won't trigger.
Am 13.09.2014 um 15:10 schrieb LuKreme:
On 12 Sep 2014, at 13:55 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 12.09.2014 um 21:49 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
However, any time I connect via telnet to this server and specify
*any* IP address in the form [X.X.X.X], the smtpd_helo_restrictions
won't trigger.
On 13 Sep 2014, at 07:35 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 13.09.2014 um 15:10 schrieb LuKreme:
On 12 Sep 2014, at 13:55 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 12.09.2014 um 21:49 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
However, any time I connect via telnet to this server and specify
*any* IP address in the form
Am 13.09.2014 um 19:12 schrieb LuKreme:
On 13 Sep 2014, at 07:35 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 13.09.2014 um 15:10 schrieb LuKreme:
On 12 Sep 2014, at 13:55 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 12.09.2014 um 21:49 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
However, any time I connect via telnet to this server and
li...@rhsoft.net:
and only because people continue to tell it is reasonable instead block
such connections
It would be a burden on YOU to convince people (well Wietse) that it is not
reasonable
check_helo_access exists
Children, stop quarreling. Postfix already has the ability to
Am 13.09.2014 um 20:19 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
and only because people continue to tell it is reasonable instead block
such connections
It would be a burden on YOU to convince people (well Wietse) that it is not
reasonable
check_helo_access exists
Children, stop
Hello Viktor,
On 10.09.14, 22:59, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:46:43PM +0200, giacomo wrote:
So you're using Cyrus SASL, but not showing any details of the SASL
configuration, available plugins, ...
The configuration of SASL is in
On 13 Sep 2014, at 11:48 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
check_helo_access exists
Exactly, so what is the problem? You seemed very unhappy that neither
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname nor reject_unknown_helo_hostname rejected
numerical helos and seemed to be taking the position that they should.
I
Am 13.09.2014 um 22:42 schrieb LuKreme:
On 13 Sep 2014, at 11:48 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
check_helo_access exists
Exactly, so what is the problem? You seemed very unhappy
the next time you respond to something read the thread
i only commented the reasonable until you stepped in
On Sep 12, 2014, at 1:55 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 12.09.2014 um 21:49 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
However, any time I connect via telnet to this server and specify
*any* IP address in the form [X.X.X.X], the smtpd_helo_restrictions
won't trigger.
This is both legal and reasonable.
On Sep 13, 2014, at 7:35 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 13.09.2014 um 15:10 schrieb LuKreme:
On 12 Sep 2014, at 13:55 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 12.09.2014 um 21:49 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
However, any time I connect via telnet to this server and specify
*any* IP address in the form
Philip Prindeville:
Who says anything about mail servers? What if it's an MUA doing
this?
If the MUA connects to the MX service (port25) then it is an issue.
If the MUA connects to port 587, then the server should not block
HELO, and instead it should require that the client authenticates.
On Sep 13, 2014, at 7:59 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Philip Prindeville:
Who says anything about mail servers? What if it's an MUA doing
this?
If the MUA connects to the MX service (port25) then it is an issue.
If the MUA connects to port 587, then the server should
15 matches
Mail list logo