Hi.
I configured client auth for sending emails. Everythings work fine but
when I change password for user I still can send email from outlook or
thunderbird with old password until I don't close mail client. If I run
again thunderbird then server ask me for new password. Is there any
On 10/8/2014 7:54 AM, Tomasz Kopczyński tkopczyn...@kompass.com.pl wrote:
I have the same problem with imap (dovecot). Even if I change password
for user I can read email in thunderbird until I close it.
You didn't say, but since you mentioned dovecot, are you using dovecot sasl?
If so,
Am 08.10.2014 um 14:55 schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 10/8/2014 7:54 AM, Tomasz Kopczyński tkopczyn...@kompass.com.pl wrote:
I have the same problem with imap (dovecot). Even if I change password
for user I can read email in thunderbird until I close it.
You didn't say, but since you mentioned
Hi,
my postfix has to forward some incoming mails to another SMTP server not
under my control. This SMTP server has filters and limits that differ
from my own, and will reject some mail that my postfix accepted. When
this happens my postfix has to send a bounce mail back to the original
sender.
Hi,
Am 2014-09-29 18:18, schrieb Mike.:
On 9/29/2014 at 10:44 AM Mike. wrote:
|I cleaned up my pslogscan.sh script a bit. Aside from some general
|cleanup, I did some re-formatting of the output to make it look a
bit
|cleaner, and allow for some flexibility in display widths. I also
|went
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/2014 10:54 AM, Lothar Gesslein wrote:
Hi,
my postfix has to forward some incoming mails to another SMTP
server not under my control. This SMTP server has filters and
limits that differ from my own, and will reject some mail that
my
Noel Jones:
The problem is some incoming mail. Postfix has no method to
selectively send some mail to the smtpd_proxy_filter, and pass
other mail through (or to a different proxy).
Yes, it would be a good idea in this case to selectively proxy
messages to the external host, but it's not
I posted these questions recently, but either nobody saw my posting
or else nobody thought that these questions wre worth of a reply.
On the chance that it was the former, I am posting these questions
again... because I still do need answers.
The SMTPD_POLICY_README file says:
In case of trouble the policy server must not send a reply. Instead the server
must log a warning and disconnect. Postfix will retry the request at some later
time.
Ummm...
I can easly handle the log a warning part, but...
As I understand it, a Postfix
On 10/8/2014 8:11 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I posted these questions recently, but either nobody saw my posting
or else nobody thought that these questions wre worth of a reply.
On the chance that it was the former, I am posting these questions
again... because I still do need answers.
On 10/8/2014 8:17 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
The SMTPD_POLICY_README file says:
In case of trouble the policy server must not send a reply. Instead the
server
must log a warning and disconnect. Postfix will retry the request at some
later
time.
Ummm...
I can easly handle the
In message 543614e5.6060...@megan.vbhcs.org,
Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 10/8/2014 8:11 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
That delay, in and of itself is not really a problem for me. What
_is_ a bit of a problem is the fact that smtpd_delay_reject doesn't
merely cause anything
This is a request for a very minor change to the semantics of the
PREPEND text result that can be returned from policy servers
and/or from specific entries within an access(5) lookup table.
It would be maximally convenient if the subject text could be
interpolated in the following trivial way:
In message 54361549.5050...@megan.vbhcs.org,
Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 10/8/2014 8:17 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
The SMTPD_POLICY_README file says:
In case of trouble the policy server must not send a reply. Instead the ser
ver
must log a warning and disconnect.
14 matches
Mail list logo
