Re: please for submission port cfg review

2015-09-04 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:44:50AM +0200, Tomas Macek wrote: > Here is the result cfg: > > submission inet n - n - - smtpd > -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject > -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes > -o content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024 >

Re: please for submission port cfg review

2015-09-04 Thread Tomas Macek
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:44:50AM +0200, Tomas Macek wrote: Here is the result cfg: submission inet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes -o

Fwd: Mailing List postfix server

2015-09-04 Thread Alberto Lepe
I'm running a Zentyal (based in Ubuntu) server, which comes with an already configured postfix server (based in few settings) using LDAP as user's database. We are using that server to send messages to mailing lists. Most of the mailing lists looks like: supp...@example.net -> j...@example.com,

Re: postfix3.0.2 compile error on AIX61/71

2015-09-04 Thread Takae Harrington
Hi Jim, Thank you for your reply! I do see ad bit in /usr/include/arpa/nameser_compat.h as follows -- does u_short/u_int, and unassigned makes difference? typedef struct { u_short id; /* query identification number */ #if BYTE_ORDER == BIG_ENDIAN /*

Re: postfix3.0.2 compile error on AIX61/71

2015-09-04 Thread Jim Reid
On 4 Sep 2015, at 23:43, Takae Harrington wrote: > does u_short/u_int, and unassigned makes difference? Maybe, maybe not. Consult your C compiler documentation. BTW I assume you meant "unsigned" instead of "unassigned". Though I doubt compiler documentation will help you

Re: postfix3.0.2 compile error on AIX61/71

2015-09-04 Thread Jim Reid
On 4 Sep 2015, at 23:43, Takae Harrington wrote: > does u_short/u_int, and unassigned makes difference? Maybe, maybe not. Consult your C compiler documentation. BTW I assume you meant "unsigned" instead of "unassigned". Though I doubt compiler documentation will help you

Re: postfix3.0.2 compile error on AIX61/71

2015-09-04 Thread Takae Harrington
Thank you, Jim. I really appreciated your input. I tried Viktor's way and it did compile (woot woot) - I will just get a confirmation from Viktor if the way I did is ok. Sincerely, Takae Harrington Unix Administrator Cloud Managed Service Delivery (MSD) IBM GTS SO Delivery Office:

Re: postfix3.0.2 compile error on AIX61/71

2015-09-04 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:59:23PM -0700, Takae Harrington wrote: > I tried make CFLAGS='-DDISABLE_DNSSEC' makefiles (and different variants), > but it did not add CFLAGS in Makefile. (so the error persisted) > Only CFLAGS in the Makefile was "SHLIB_CFLAGS" and it looked like I can > pass the

Re: please for submission port cfg review

2015-09-04 Thread Tomas Macek
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 03:05:07PM +0200, Tomas Macek wrote: submission inet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes -o content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024 -o syslog_name=submission