Re: Using postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map

On Oct 20, 2015, at 7:44 PM, Alex wrote: > I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to > emails that are rejected. Why would you do that? If someone hits your blocks and doesn’t know why they were blocked you may find yourself on blocklists

RE: Using postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map

I just point everything to http://multirbl.valli.org so they can see if they are listed on multiple rbl servers. And imo thats better, then, mailing, getting rejected, by for example spamhaus. Going to that site, checking, removing. Mailing again, and now again blocked, other rbl server etc.

Re: Using postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:59:29PM -0400, Alex wrote: > Oct 21 19:56:10 mail01 postfix/smtpd[20778]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT > from bx1.c4xf.com[66.150.190.74]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; > Unverified Client host [bx1.c4xf.com] blocked using > mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net; >

Re: multiple IPs and postscreen

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Eric Abrahamsen: >> > TLS? In that case you also need two tlsproxy services, each with >> > their own certificate stuff. >> > >> > 1.2.3.5:smtp inet n - n - 1 postscreen >> > -o tlsproxy_service_name=tlsproxy_1.2.3.5 >> > -o

Re: Using postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map

Hi, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Alex: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to >> emails that are rejected. I've set up postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map and >> it's working properly for most: >> >> Oct 20

Re: Using postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map

On October 22, 2015 12:39:52 AM Alex wrote: http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html I'm unsure what else to do from here. http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html point 7

Re: Using postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map

Hi, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:38 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > I just point everything to http://multirbl.valli.org so they can see if they > are listed on multiple rbl servers. That's a great idea. How did you configure your system to do that? > And imo thats better, then,

Re: Using postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map

Hi, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On October 22, 2015 12:39:52 AM Alex wrote: > >> http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html >> >> I'm unsure what else to do from here. > > http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html > > point 7

Re: Postfix mail are getting queued

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:10:46PM +0600, Alamgir Shamim wrote: > Oct 21 14:04:06 spamguard postfix/qmgr[30495]: fatal: qmgr_active_feed: > 1E8E01426E1: rename from incoming to active: Input/output error Perhaps you have corruption in the filesystem. Or a security policy that's denying the

Re: Postfix mail are getting queued

Viktor Dukhovni: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:10:46PM +0600, Alamgir Shamim wrote: > > > Oct 21 14:04:06 spamguard postfix/qmgr[30495]: fatal: qmgr_active_feed: > > 1E8E01426E1: rename from incoming to active: Input/output error > > Perhaps you have corruption in the filesystem. Or a security

Re: email duplicates

Marco Stoecker: > > All the evidence that you need is logged by Postfix and mailman: > > track down a duplicate delivery back to the source and look for > > delivery errors. > > Will do a double-check of all the logfiles again. Maybe I have overseen > something. As I'm not the 'expert' in those

Re: Using postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map

Alex: > Hi, > > I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to > emails that are rejected. I've set up postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map and > it's working properly for most: > > Oct 20 21:41:36 mail02 postfix/postscreen[17651]: NOQUEUE: reject: > RCPT from

Postfix mail are getting queued

Hello, I am facing a problem with postfix. Incoming mails are getting queued randomly. When I see the log I found the below repeatedly and see that incoming mails are getting queued. Oct 21 14:04:06 spamguard postfix/qmgr[30495]: fatal: qmgr_active_feed: 1E8E01426E1: rename from incoming to

Re: This maybe off topic, but could somebody tell me what i am doing wrong?

On 2015-10-21 01:51, John Allen wrote: I have not looked at the code, so I am guessing, but it seems that mail/mailx hadle a continuous block of text differently to a multi-line block. I am not competent to decide if the as it should be or not. I have a script that checks for various

Re: email duplicates

On 10/20/2015 11:31 PM, wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Marco Stoecker: -- Start of PGP signed section. Hi, I do have a combination of postfix and mailman and use postfix as a relayhost. I get all the mails for mailman via fetchmail. The whole system is Debian 8 with its packages for postfix