Mails in active queue are never tried to be sent

Hello everybody!! i am trying to run a filter relay with Postfix and i have a doubt about active queues i need help with, please... Postfix documentation states clearly that: "Messages in the active queue are ready to be sent (runnable), but are not necessarily in the process of being sent

Re: RHEL / CentOS 7 RPMs

On 15/03/16 07:56, Peter wrote: > On 15/03/16 07:15, Nikolaos Milas wrote: >> Unfortunately, it seems that GhettoForge is currently (14 March) down >> (it shows some errors with a backtrace), > > I wasn't aware of that and will get it fixed ASAP. The ghettoforge site is fixed now, thanks for

SV: MAIL FROM validiity

SPF and DKIM is mail tools to prevent spoofing of non-local domains. OP was out after tools to prevent local spoofing. One is for example: 1: reject_sender_login_mismatch 2: Other is a check_sender_access table containing "yourdomain.com: permit_sasl_authenticated, reject". 3: Another one is

Re: MAIL FROM validiity

Am 14.03.2016 um 12:50 schrieb Pascal Maes: I would like that everybody who is sending mail from outside our network and identified with sasl uses the email address corresponding to the uid. The mail should be rejected if the uid and the email address do not match. I think a good start here

Re: RHEL / CentOS 7 RPMs

On 15/03/16 07:15, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > Unfortunately, it seems that GhettoForge is currently (14 March) down > (it shows some errors with a backtrace), I wasn't aware of that and will get it fixed ASAP. The repos are still up and those are the important parts:

[OT] Re: Is /usr/bin/mail a link to sendmail/postfix

On 14-03-16 17:05, @lbutlr wrote: > On Mar 13, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Robert Chalmers > wrote: >> Nice hardware, but the software is really recycled FreeBSD. say >> what? > > This should not be news. One of the reasons I chose FreeBSD for my > servers was because I wouldn’t

Re: RHEL / CentOS 7 RPMs

Am 14.03.2016 um 19:15 schrieb Nikolaos Milas: > Thank you all for the feedback. > > Unfortunately, it seems that GhettoForge is currently (14 March) down > (it shows some errors with a backtrace), while repo.mailserver.guru does > not appear to include source rpms (SRPMs). If I am missing

Re: RHEL / CentOS 7 RPMs

Thank you all for the feedback. Unfortunately, it seems that GhettoForge is currently (14 March) down (it shows some errors with a backtrace), while repo.mailserver.guru does not appear to include source rpms (SRPMs). If I am missing something, please point me to the right direction. It is

Re: Postfix logs disordered

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Milan Popovic wrote: > I am facing an "issue" with logs. I want to process the logs on the fly. > > Postfix ID1 -> Sophos -> Postfix ID2 > > I think postfix for performance reason writes logs after processing > messages. I can see this kind of situation

Re: Is /usr/bin/mail a link to sendmail/postfix

Yes, I moved the Apple /usr/bin/sendmail to /usr/bin/old-sendmail Then created a symlink from my own build of sendmail. /usr/local/bin/sendmail to /usr/bin/sendmail, and now Apple’s mail works as it should. The original complaint from mail when I moved the /etc/postfix directory to

Re: Is /usr/bin/mail a link to sendmail/postfix

On Mar 13, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Robert Chalmers wrote: > Nice hardware, but the software is really recycled FreeBSD. say what? This should not be news. One of the reasons I chose FreeBSD for my servers was because I wouldn’t have to change modes between OS X and my

Re: Is /usr/bin/mail a link to sendmail/postfix

On Mar 13, 2016, at 12:58 AM, rob...@chalmers.com.au wrote: > So I renamed/moved /etc/postfix, to /etc/old-postfix. .which has been ok, > except for 'mail' > Eg > echo date | mail rob...@chalmers.com > Fails with > 'can't find /etc/postfix/main.cf' > > It's the only thing that fails. I move

Re: domainname rewriting issue...

Morning, I made a post earlier and Victor pointed me to some documentation. Unfortunately I think I did not properly explain the issue, and am still not able to get the results I'm looking for. I will try again here, thanks for your patience... We have a large number of machines sending mail

Re: OT yahoo

On Mar 13, 2016, at 10:52 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > Are you saying they only looked at the primary NS record? That’s my theory, yes. > Maybe I misread a prior post but I thought you meant primary MX record. The > former, if true, would be even more broken. This

Re: Postfix logs disordered

Hi and thank you Wietse for your quick reply. Correct me if i am wrong but you said that : before-filter smtp logs that mail is delivered before-filter qmgr logs that the file is deleted after-filter qmgr logs sender and number of recipients and in my case it's not : Jan 9 08:03:25 smtp1

Re: Postfix logs disordered

Milan Popovic: > Hi, > > I am developing a parser for postfix which interact with logstash and > elasticsearch. The architecture use Sophos puremessage for > antispam/antivirus. > I am facing an "issue" with logs. I want to process the logs on the fly. > When a message come into the system,

Postfix logs disordered

Hi, I am developing a parser for postfix which interact with logstash and elasticsearch. The architecture use Sophos puremessage for antispam/antivirus. I am facing an "issue" with logs. I want to process the logs on the fly. When a message come into the system, postfix process it, send it to the

SV: MAIL FROM validiity

The rule is still a good idea to have even if you have a rule to reject a sasl mismatch, because the suggested rule also rejects mail which have a spoofed local sender destined for a local mailbox. Something that none of the standard rules can enforce. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från:

Re: MAIL FROM validiity

> Le 12 mars 2016 à 17:28, @lbutlr a écrit : > > On Mar 10, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Sebastian Nielsen wrote: >> Create a file containing the following (where yourdomain.com is the domain >> your authenticated users send from): >> >> yourdomain.com: