Re: Postfix forwarder/relay server with LDAP

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 10:06 AM, tbucha...@vinu.edu wrote: > > My successful ldapsearch command is this: ldapsearch -x -H > ldap://ldapserver.example.com:389/ -b > "ou=People,o=oldserver.example.com,o=example.com" -D "uid=admin, > ou=Administrators, ou=TopologyManagement, o=NetscapeRoot" -w

Re: whitelist scoring in postscreen_dnsbl_sites=?

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 08:13:14AM -0700, jaso...@mail-central.com wrote: > I'm learning about whitelist scoring in postscreen_dnsbl_sites= > > /dev/rob0 mentioned using these > > postscreen_dnsbl_sites= >... BLACKLISTS ... >swl.spamhaus.org*-4 You can pretty much

Re: whitelist scoring in postscreen_dnsbl_sites=?

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > dwl.spamhaus.org lists domain names and is not compatible with > postscreen, which only knows the IP. I needed to be reminded of that :-/ > dwl can be used in one of the > smtpd_*_restrictions sections. >

Re: Issues with postscreen and barracuda spam firewall

Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Thursday, March 31, 2016 9:15 PM -0400 Wietse Venema > wrote: > > >> Is this a known issue with Barracuda? Anyone have an idea how to work > >> around this? Clearly having their spam appliance be non-functional > >> isn't a great start. ;) >

Re: whitelist scoring in postscreen_dnsbl_sites=?

On 4/1/2016 10:13 AM, jaso...@mail-central.com wrote: > I'm learning about whitelist scoring in postscreen_dnsbl_sites= ... > > One of the servers that's been shown to me has, instead > > postscreen_dnsbl_sites= >... BLACKLISTS ... >dwl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[2;3]*-3 >

Re: Issues with postscreen and barracuda spam firewall

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 10:36:17AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Thursday, March 31, 2016 9:15 PM -0400 Wietse Venema > wrote: > > >>Is this a known issue with Barracuda? Anyone have an idea how to work > >>around this? Clearly having their spam appliance be

Re: Issues with postscreen and barracuda spam firewall

--On Friday, April 01, 2016 11:36 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Thursday, March 31, 2016 9:15 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: Is this a known issue with Barracuda? Anyone have an idea how to work around this? Clearly having their spam

Re: Issues with postscreen and barracuda spam firewall

> > Running Postscreen after a spam appliance is pointless. It is a > > spambot detector (in more sophisticated words, it implements IP > > address-based reputation). > > Ok. But I still would like to know where in the stack the problem is. > Right now, they are simply testing a release

Re: Issues with postscreen and barracuda spam firewall

--On Thursday, March 31, 2016 9:15 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: Is this a known issue with Barracuda? Anyone have an idea how to work around this? Clearly having their spam appliance be non-functional isn't a great start. ;) Running Postscreen after a spam

Re: problem with postfix and outlook365

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:31 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > >> Apr 1 17:12:19 elrng-backup postfix/smtp[10780]: warning: >> SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found > > This very warning is mentioned in SASL_README: > >

Re: problem with postfix and outlook365

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:20:54PM +0200, Paolo Mioni wrote: > I'm writing to ask for help with the following problem. I > cannot use outlook365 as a relay host for Postfix. > I'm using postfix 2.6 (which happens to be 3+ years past its EOL date) > I receive the following error: > > Apr 1

Re: problem with postfix and outlook365

Sorry, forget about this mail. I've solved it myself. Thanks anyway. On 04/01/2016 05:20 PM, Paolo Mioni wrote: Hi, I'm writing to ask for help with the following problem. I cannot use outlook365 as a relay host for Postfix. I'm using postfix 2.6 I receive the following error: Apr 1

Re: whitelist scoring in postscreen_dnsbl_sites=?

jaso...@mail-central.com: > (1) Does order matter in [postscreen_dnsbl_sites]? There is no "order": the lookups happen in parallel. The result is computed when all replies are received, or when the greet_wait time limit is reached. Wietse

Re: understanding postscreen cache?

Wietse: > > Correct. Postscreen remembers tests that a client has passed. But > > the client must pass all tests before postscreen will log a "PASS". Brad Chandler: > If a spamming IP is at first not listed on an RBL and gets a postscreen > PASS, but is later added to an RBL, will postscreen

problem with postfix and outlook365

Hi, I'm writing to ask for help with the following problem. I cannot use outlook365 as a relay host for Postfix. I'm using postfix 2.6 I receive the following error: Apr 1 17:12:19 elrng-backup postfix/smtp[10780]: warning: SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found Apr 1

Re: understanding postscreen cache?

> Why do you care? Because I'm actually trying to understand how things works and are best used. On Thu, Mar 31, 2016, at 04:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > However the dnsblog client is stateless; it relies on caching in your local > DNS resolver. Okay, that's the part I missed. Thanks. Jason

whitelist scoring in postscreen_dnsbl_sites=?

I'm learning about whitelist scoring in postscreen_dnsbl_sites= /dev/rob0 mentioned using these postscreen_dnsbl_sites= ... BLACKLISTS ... swl.spamhaus.org*-4 list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].0*-2 list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].1*-3

Re: understanding postscreen cache?

> My understanding was that postscreen, once it catches a bad actor, it caches the result so subsequent attempts get a response from the cache. IIRC postscreen caches PASS results only. Correct. Postscreen remembers tests that a client has passed. But the client must pass all tests before

Postfix forwarder/relay server with LDAP

I am trying to set up a Postfix mail server to take emails to a certain domain and redirect them to external email addresses based on LDAP information. I am new to Postfix and LDAP. Back story -- we no longer want to host email accounts for a certain domain and have directed members of that