Re: reject empty sender address for authenticated users

On 4/15/2016 4:02 PM, Michael D. Sofka wrote: > I would like to be able to reject the empty envelope-sender, <>, for > authenticated email to our submission and smtps ports. That is, I > want to stop: > > 235 2.7.0 Authentication successful > mail from:<> > 250 2.1.0 Ok > rcpt

reject empty sender address for authenticated users

I would like to be able to reject the empty envelope-sender, <>, for authenticated email to our submission and smtps ports. That is, I want to stop: 235 2.7.0 Authentication successful mail from:<> 250 2.1.0 Ok rcpt to: 250 2.1.5 Ok Before quoting the RFC,

Re: Autoresponder

I'm not sure of your email client software, but Thunderbird and Roundcube can be configured to interact with Sieve rules. You or the admin creates the global rules for all users and your users turn them on and off as needed in their client software which only entails a checkbox...If I remember

Re: Autoresponder

Hi, Thanks, but doesn't that require a shell account for users to configure vacation? If so, that's a deal braker for me, I don't want to give virtual users access to the system. Thanks. Dave. On 4/15/16, Dirk Stöcker wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, David Mehler wrote: >

Re: Autoresponder

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, David Mehler wrote: I'm looking for an autoresponder, free, and one that does not rely on postfixadmin. I saw one featured in a howtoforge article called Autoresponse 1.6.3 but that has been taken down, which is unfortunate, because how it worked, sending an email to an

Autoresponder

Hello, I'm looking for an autoresponder, free, and one that does not rely on postfixadmin. I saw one featured in a howtoforge article called Autoresponse 1.6.3 but that has been taken down, which is unfortunate, because how it worked, sending an email to an address sounded great for my needs.

Re: virtually identical support but..

lejeczek: > On 15/04/16 13:14, lejeczek wrote: > > hi everybody > > > > there is a but :) I fail to understand, > > I have two virtually identical setups, both relay to one > > specific domain, yet! - one gets: 550-Verification failed > > 550-Invalid domain part in email address. > > > > gee...

Scoring TLDs

Is there a simple way that anyone uses to basically setup a map as a sort of fake RBL for post screen scoring? I’d like to score most of these new TLDs, for example, but I am not necessarily willing to simply blacklist them all (I am blacklisting .top because so far it’s been 100% spam)

Re: virtually identical support but..

On 15/04/16 13:14, lejeczek wrote: hi everybody there is a but :) I fail to understand, I have two virtually identical setups, both relay to one specific domain, yet! - one gets: 550-Verification failed 550-Invalid domain part in email address. gee... what am I missing? Both servers are on

virtually identical support but..

hi everybody there is a but :) I fail to understand, I have two virtually identical setups, both relay to one specific domain, yet! - one gets: 550-Verification failed 550-Invalid domain part in email address. gee... what am I missing? Both servers are on the same net, and the rest of

Re: NEWSFLASH: DANE TLSA records published for web.de!

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Christian Kivalo wrote: One would think so, but: I asked my main domain provider domaindiscount24 which introduced DNSSEC last year when they will offer TLSA, DS and SSHFP records also. Their answer: Currently the requested features aren't available and we can make no

Re: NEWSFLASH: DANE TLSA records published for web.de!

>> There are 165 "postfix-users" subscriber domains that have MX >> records and MX hosts in DNSSEC signed zones. You've done the hard >> part of deploying DNSSEC, deploying DANE TLSA for email is >> comparatively simple. > >One would think so, but: I asked my main domain provider

Re: NEWSFLASH: DANE TLSA records published for web.de!

On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: The web.de domain has just published DANE TLSA records for its MX hosts. This follows earlier "pilot" deployments with the smaller mail.com and mail.de domains. Fine! I already thought they wouldn't do it. The announcement was in August last year