Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

On 5 May 2016, at 22:24, Bill Cole wrote: [ blah blah blah ] OR: I was entirely wrong about the broken SPF records being the cause of that rejection. Noel & Christian were right in pointing you at the access maps. You MIGHT also run into the SPF issue after exempting that sender from the

Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:24:49PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote: > >I discovered this issue in their DNS with respect to SPF: > > > >;; ANSWER SECTION: > >lymanworldwide.com. 1800IN TXT "v=spf1 > >include:netcore.co.in -all" > >lymanworldwide.com. 1800IN TXT "v=spf1 >

Re: virtual_alias_domains address rewriting?

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 12:04:09PM -0700, Jack Bates wrote: > Is there an address rewriting step that affects only virtual_alias_domains? No. > The following achieved my desired behavior: > > virtual_alias_domains = nottheoilrig.com > virtual_alias_maps = inline:{

Re: virtual_alias_domains address rewriting?

Jack Bates: > Is there an address rewriting step that affects only virtual_alias_domains? No, there is no address rewriting for virtual_alias_domains only (or for relay_domains, or for virtual_mailbox_domains). > I tried the following: > >virtual_alias_domains = nottheoilrig.com >

virtual_alias_domains address rewriting?

Is there an address rewriting step that affects only virtual_alias_domains? I tried the following: virtual_alias_domains = nottheoilrig.com virtual_alias_maps = static:nottheoilrig expecting to deliver all virtual_alias_domains mail to one user, and I was surprised when ALL mail was

Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

On Thu, May 5, 2016 12:37, Christian Kivalo wrote: > > There it is: lymanworldwide.com uses nameservices provided by > name-services.com > Thanks, that is it. I suppose we will just have to explicitly permit them in. Not that I approve of their choice of registrars (enom). Thanks for the

Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

Am 5. Mai 2016 18:30:40 MESZ, schrieb "James B. Byrne" : > >On Thu, May 5, 2016 12:11, Christian Kivalo wrote: >> >> >> Am 5. Mai 2016 17:34:36 MESZ, schrieb "James B. Byrne" >> : >>>Can anyone clue me in on what configuration issue might be causing

Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

On Thu, May 5, 2016 12:11, Christian Kivalo wrote: > > > Am 5. Mai 2016 17:34:36 MESZ, schrieb "James B. Byrne" > : >>Can anyone clue me in on what configuration issue might be causing >>this and whose configuration it is, mine or theirs? >> >>postfix-p25/smtpd[18149]:

Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

On 5/5/2016 10:34 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > Can anyone clue me in on what configuration issue might be causing > this and whose configuration it is, mine or theirs? > > postfix-p25/smtpd[18149]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > smout-245174.nsmailserv.com[202.162.245.174]: 450 4.7.1 >

Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

Am 5. Mai 2016 17:34:36 MESZ, schrieb "James B. Byrne" : >Can anyone clue me in on what configuration issue might be causing >this and whose configuration it is, mine or theirs? > >postfix-p25/smtpd[18149]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from

Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

try use "~all" instead of "-all" in your SPF txt record. On 16-05-05 08:57 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2016 11:34, James B. Byrne wrote: Can anyone clue me in on what configuration issue might be causing this and whose configuration it is, mine or theirs?

Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

On Thu, May 5, 2016 12:01, Gao wrote: > try use "~all" instead of "-all" in your SPF txt record. > We are not the sender. We are the recipient. Our SPF record does not bear on this issue insofar as I can see. In any case, our SPF TXT RR already includes ~all, not -all. -- ***

Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

On Thu, May 5, 2016 11:34, James B. Byrne wrote: > Can anyone clue me in on what configuration issue might be causing > this and whose configuration it is, mine or theirs? > > postfix-p25/smtpd[18149]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > smout-245174.nsmailserv.com[202.162.245.174]: 450 4.7.1 >

Re: Postfix error 450 4.7.1 Sender address rejected: Access denied

Can anyone clue me in on what configuration issue might be causing this and whose configuration it is, mine or theirs? postfix-p25/smtpd[18149]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from smout-245174.nsmailserv.com[202.162.245.174]: 450 4.7.1 : Sender address rejected: Access denied;