Re: SASL with/without TLS in logs

2016-07-07 Thread Marek Salwerowicz
W dniu 2016-07-07 o 19:04, Wietse Venema pisze: Marek Salwerowicz: However, I would like to find sooner or later clients that don't use STARTTLS befoe authentication. How can I configure postfix to see differences in logs? Assuming that no sane client sends AUTH *before* sending STARTTLS, all

Re: SASL with/without TLS in logs

2016-07-07 Thread Wietse Venema
Marek Salwerowicz: > However, I would like to find sooner or later clients that don't use > STARTTLS befoe authentication. > > How can I configure postfix to see differences in logs? Assuming that no sane client sends AUTH *before* sending STARTTLS, all you need is to set "smtpd_tls_loglevel=1"

Re: DNS IP <-> domain <-> IP2 unblocking

2016-07-07 Thread Noel Jones
On 7/6/2016 6:55 PM, Homer Wilson Smith wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Noel Jones wrote: >> For the other possible combinations of bad DNS setup, you'll need to >> use a policy service. > > OK, can you point me to RTFM for this? > Documentation:

Re: SASL with/without TLS in logs

2016-07-07 Thread Marek Salwerowicz
W dniu 2016-07-07 o 15:55, Marek Salwerowicz pisze: Hi list, I am performing a migration from a legacy mail server to a new one. I am afraid that due to "backward compatibility" I have to leave SASL authentication available over an unencrypted channel. However, I would like to find sooner

SASL with/without TLS in logs

2016-07-07 Thread Marek Salwerowicz
Hi list, I am performing a migration from a legacy mail server to a new one. I am afraid that due to "backward compatibility" I have to leave SASL authentication available over an unencrypted channel. However, I would like to find sooner or later clients that don't use STARTTLS befoe

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql...

2016-07-07 Thread Norton Allen
On 7/7/2016 8:16 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: Note that your problem at this point has*nothing* to do with majordomo. Switching to Mailman would not change anything. I second this. I run both Mailman and Majordomo (on separate servers) and the Postfix configuration is almost identical.

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql...

2016-07-07 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:30:33PM +0100, postmas...@quantum-radio.net wrote: > Getting closer. But not understanding some basics. > Now at least using the command line, > > echo 'lists' | mail majordomo See "man mail" to learn how to use your mailx(1) client. Or, better yet, as below, just

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql...

2016-07-07 Thread postmas...@quantum-radio.net
Getting closer. Now at least using the command line, echo 'lists' | mail majordomo I get this. It is actually looking to deliver it to the command line. = But not yet... Jul 7 08:48:21 zeus postfix/pickup[95164]: 2AF4137FD740: uid=3D501 = from=3D Jul 7 08:48:21 zeus postfix/cleanup[96311]:

Re: reject_unverified_recipient and destination not available

2016-07-07 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:14:19PM +0200, Chris wrote: > what happens, if reject_unverified_recipient is enabled, but the > server of the relay domain isn't available? The name of the restriction contains the answer. The recipient address cannot be verified, so the mail is rejected. See:

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql... close

2016-07-07 Thread postmas...@quantum-radio.net
Found the sticky problem. There was a commented out line in “mydestination” that continued to a second line, and that second line was not commented out. like this… #mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, $mydomain, mail.$mydomain, www.$mydomain Fixed, and now on