Re: Getting false unknown user errors

On 01 Nov 2016, at 07:21, Bill Cole wrote: > > Please, humor me: set syslog_name and retest. I have set it, but the occurrence of amavis sending a virus alert is quite rare. The last one before this was more than a month ago. Not sure how to force

Re: DMARC fail

On 02/11/16 03:41, Steve Jenkins wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:38 PM, André Rodier > wrote: Hello all! I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM, SPF and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere,

Re: DMARC fail

On 02/11/16 00:52, Bill Cole wrote: On 1 Nov 2016, at 16:11, Andre Rodier wrote: Hello all! I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM, SPF and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because the "Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail":

Re: DMARC fail

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:38 PM, André Rodier wrote: > Hello all! > > I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM, SPF > and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because the > "Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail": > >

Re: DMARC fail

On 1 Nov 2016, at 16:11, Andre Rodier wrote: Hello all! I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM, SPF and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because the "Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail": Does anyone knows why, please? Not

Re: Documentation of virtual_alias_maps: Was: Re: Getting false unknown user errors

Todd C. Olson: > which has been hard since I don't yet have a full gestalt of how > postfix works. My recommendation: don't try to do complex things with Postfix until you are familiar with how the relevant parts of Postfix work. Develop a system step-by-step, instead of doing it all at once.

Documentation of virtual_alias_maps: Was: Re: Getting false unknown user errors

Hi Hum ... this conversation has alerted me to the possibility that virtual_alias_maps has two different roles ... I am/have_been confused on this despite spending weeks pondering the documentation. Is the following summary correct and complete? If so, then the proposed additions to

DMARC fail

Hello all! I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM, SPF and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because the "Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail": Does anyone knows why, please? I have send an email to an online DMARC test, and

DMARC fail

Hello all! I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM, SPF and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because the "Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail": Does anyone knows why, please? I have send an email to an online DMARC test, and

Re: smtp_bind_address affects outbound too?

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:17:10AM -0400, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > I am not sure what I want. The smtp_bind_address has been in the > config for ages, possibly added by someone else. I don't mind if > Postfix listens on all interfaces and I can't even imagine a > scenario where I would want to

Re: inet or unix socket in main and master and parameters

Chris: > In main.cf smtp-amavis is an internet socket, isn't it? > > content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024 delivery agent-^^^ ^^^---delivery destination main.cf says that the delivery agent smtp-amavis will make a connection to internet socket [127.0.0.1]:10024.

Re: smtp_bind_address affects outbound too?

D'Arcy Cain: > I am not sure what I want. The smtp_bind_address has been in the config > for ages, possibly added by someone else. I don't mind if Postfix > listens on all interfaces and I can't even imagine a scenario where I > would want to limit outgoing interfaces. These days

Re: smtp_bind_address affects outbound too?

On 2016-10-31 03:39 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:20:29PM -0400, D'Arcy Cain wrote: Is this expected behaviour? I set smtp_bind_address to our external interface to receive email It affects outbound *only* ... it has nothing to do with mail reception. Doh! I keep

Re: Getting false unknown user errors

On 31 Oct 2016, at 23:17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Oct 31, 2016, at 10:49 PM, Bill Cole wrote: virtual_alias_domains = kreme.com virtual_alias_maps = hash:$config_directory/virtual proxy:mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf

Problem implementing sender_dependent_relayhost_maps

Hello, I am trying to set up my postfix server so that it sends outgoing emails having a from address matching *@pobox.com to the server smtp.pobox.com, using port 587. As this rule is matching from addresses, and pobox.com is not the final destination, smtp.pobox.com requires authentication. I

Re: Getting false unknown user errors

On 1 Nov 2016, at 1:46, @lbutlr wrote: On Oct 31, 2016, at 8:49 PM, Bill Cole wrote: On 31 Oct 2016, at 22:04, @lbutlr wrote: On 31 Oct 2016, at 17:08, wilfried.es...@essignetz.de wrote: Am 31.10.2016 um 23:51 schrieb @lbutlr: ... No

Re: postfix 3.2 version 1031

Florian Piekert: > Hello, > > the Halloween Edition 1031 of pf 3.2 seems to have some issues on my system, > resulting in > > mail.log > Nov 1 13:46:20 bhaal postfix/master[3558]: warning: process > /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 3612 killed by signal 11 > Nov 1 13:46:20 bhaal

Using LDAP for DKIM lookups

Thanks for the responses to my previous post regarding DKIM signatures, I have DMARC working as well and testing some new SA rules now. I want to LDAP SigningTable and KeyTable, where we already have Postfix transport and other lookup records. But I continue to receive no signing table match

postfix 3.2 version 1031

Hello, the Halloween Edition 1031 of pf 3.2 seems to have some issues on my system, resulting in mail.log Nov 1 13:46:20 bhaal postfix/master[3558]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 3612 killed by signal 11 Nov 1 13:46:20 bhaal postfix/master[3558]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd:

Re: [Feature-request] (smtpd_)milter_exceptions

Christian Ro??ner: > > > Am 25.10.2016 um 08:22 schrieb Wietse Venema : > > > > Wietse Venema: > >> Wietse Venema: > >>> Looks like either 1) an exclusion mechanism or 2) a selection > >>> mechanism would do the job. > >>> > >>> 1) Nullifies the smtpd_milters setting

Re: Getting false unknown user errors

Sorry, the port in my example should be 10027: Set in amavisd configs: $notify_method = 'smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10027'; Willi

Re: [Feature-request] (smtpd_)milter_exceptions

> Am 25.10.2016 um 08:22 schrieb Wietse Venema : > > Wietse Venema: >> Wietse Venema: >>> Looks like either 1) an exclusion mechanism or 2) a selection >>> mechanism would do the job. >>> >>> 1) Nullifies the smtpd_milters setting depending on the client. >>> >>> 2)

Re: Getting false unknown user errors

Am 01.11.2016 um 06:46 schrieb @lbutlr: ... >>> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd >>>-o content_filter= >>>-o local_recipient_maps= >>>-o relay_recipient_maps= >>>-o smtpd_restriction_classes= >>>-o smtpd_client_restrictions= >>>-o