Re: sender rules ahead of recipient rules?

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Paulo Fraser wrote: > > We send email on behalf of customers as part of our product and run outbound > only mail servers for this. Thus we send out mail with many different sender > addresses. Some customers have asked us to relay

Re: Resolve before transport

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:35:14PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > I send my emails via different gateways based on my transport file. Many > > domains, however, use the same email providers, such as outlook or > > gmail. Is there a way to check the MX records before the email is sent > > and

Re: sender rules ahead of recipient rules?

On 9/29/2017 1:23 PM, Paulo Fraser wrote: > We send email on behalf of customers as part of our product and run > outbound only mail servers for this.  Thus we send out mail with > many different sender addresses.  Some customers have asked us to > relay their mail through their servers, which we

Re: Resolve before transport

Peter: > Hi guys, > > I send my emails via different gateways based on my transport file. Many > domains, however, use the same email providers, such as outlook or > gmail. Is there a way to check the MX records before the email is sent > and transport it using a specific gateway? Not yet. The

sender rules ahead of recipient rules?

We send email on behalf of customers as part of our product and run outbound only mail servers for this. Thus we send out mail with many different sender addresses. Some customers have asked us to relay their mail through their servers, which we are happy to do.

Re: Bombarded With Spam

On 9/27/2017 3:02 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Looks like sender address rejection. the error message seems to be custom, which means you should search for check_sender_access in your config file. Yes. Custom messages in sender_access you can't reject sender at HELO stage, because

Re: Resolve before transport

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Peter wrote: > Hi guys, > > I send my emails via different gateways based on my transport file. Many > domains, however, use the same email providers, such as outlook or > gmail. Is there a way to check the MX records before the email is

Re: Resolve before transport

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > >> I send my emails via different gateways based on my transport file. Many >> domains, however, use the same email providers, such as outlook or >> gmail. Is there a way to check the MX records before the email is sent

Re: Resolve before transport

On 9/29/2017 3:12 AM, Peter wrote: > Hi guys, > > I send my emails via different gateways based on my transport file. Many > domains, however, use the same email providers, such as outlook or > gmail. Is there a way to check the MX records before the email is sent > and transport it using a

Re: SSL/TLS configuration for relaying

I don't pretend to be expert, but that's what works for me with postfix 3.1: smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt smtp_tls_mandatory_ciphers = high smtp_tls_security_level = secure smtp_tls_secure_cert_match = nexthop smtp_tls_session_cache_database =

SSL/TLS configuration for relaying

Hi all I'm stuck with enabling SSL/TLS on an existing setup. I got a postfix mail server (host=smtp) configured for some domains that relay all messages for these domains to a second mail server (hmailserver, host = mail). This setup works fine when I use smtp:25 to forward mail from

Re: address extension fails for mailman

Here is my main.cf and output in /var/log/mail.log after sending an email from localhost. And here, /var/log/mail.log

Resolve before transport

Hi guys, I send my emails via different gateways based on my transport file. Many domains, however, use the same email providers, such as outlook or gmail. Is there a way to check the MX records before the email is sent and transport it using a specific gateway? Cheers, Peter

Re: address extension fails for mailman

On 2017-09-29 10:07, thorthor wrote: This post should contain the log and main.cf. Don't attach, post inline -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html -- Christian Kivalo

Re: address extension fails for mailman

This post should contain the log and main.cf. -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html

Re: address extension fails for mailman

Hmm.. That's why I posted the log and configuration. Seems those parts have been deleted from the post. I'll add it as soon as I get to the office. -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html