Wietse Venema:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:37:41PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >
> > > First entry for gmail was:
> > >
> > > Jun 19 09:52:42 mail-cvk postfix/smtp[32063]: 45THH93PXyz1Z4Kq:
> > > to=,
> > > relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26]:25,
> > >
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:37:41PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > First entry for gmail was:
> >
> > Jun 19 09:52:42 mail-cvk postfix/smtp[32063]: 45THH93PXyz1Z4Kq:
> > to=,
> > relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26]:25,
> > delay=4.8,
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:37:41PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> First entry for gmail was:
>
> Jun 19 09:52:42 mail-cvk postfix/smtp[32063]: 45THH93PXyz1Z4Kq:
> to=,
> relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26]:25,
> delay=4.8, delays=3.3/0.04/0.62/0.84, dsn=5.2.2, status=bounced
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:28:52PM +0200, sral...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm trying to establish smtp_tls_security_level=verify connection with just
> one domain.
--
succeeding
--
> From mail.log:
>
> Outgoing message:
>
> Verified TLS connection established to
On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 21:15 -0500, Chris Pollock wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 13:29 +1000, Richard James Salts wrote:
> > On Monday, 17 June 2019 7:48:05 PM AEST Chris Pollock wrote:
> > > Apologies if the subject is vague however I'll attempt to explain
> > > further. I run a cron job once a
El 19/6/19 a las 21:50, Bastian Blank escribió:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:28:52PM +0200, sral...@gmail.com wrote:
Verified TLS connection established to MXhost[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]:25:
TLSv1.1
with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)
Postfix: I can verify the certificate of the remote
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:28:52PM +0200, sral...@gmail.com wrote:
> Verified TLS connection established to MXhost[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]:25: TLSv1.1
> with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)
Postfix: I can verify the certificate of the remote host
> postfix/smtp[]: : to=,
Hi,
I'm trying to establish smtp_tls_security_level=verify connection with
just one domain. I set a tls_policy in which I set domain verify,
smtp_tls_security_level=may in main.cf. When we try to perform some test
I can receive messages but is not possible to send I get deferred 4.7.0
A. Schulze:
>
>
> Am 19.06.19 um 12:53 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> >> On Jun 19, 2019, at 6:37 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >>
> >> The error message says:
> >>
> >> Protocol error: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26] said: 250
> >> 2.1.5 OK w9si551343wmd.47 - gsmtp (in reply to
On 6/19/2019 6:13 AM, Durga Prasad Malyala wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 15:41 Viktor Dukhovni
mailto:postfix-us...@dukhovni.org>> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:43:13AM +0530, Durga Prasad Malyala
wrote:
> I am seeing a peculiar problem in on of our servers. Some
mails
Am 19.06.19 um 12:53 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
>> On Jun 19, 2019, at 6:37 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>> The error message says:
>>
>> Protocol error: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26] said: 250
>> 2.1.5 OK w9si551343wmd.47 - gsmtp (in reply to DATA command)
>
> Ralf, your
Wietse Venema:
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > Jun 19 09:52:43 mail-cvk postfix/smtp[32063]: 45THH93PXyz1Z4Kq:
> > to=,
> > relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26]:25, delay=4.8,
> > delays=3.3/0.04/0.62/0.84, dsn=5.5.0, status=bounced (Protocol error: host
> >
* Wietse Venema :
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > Jun 19 09:52:43 mail-cvk postfix/smtp[32063]: 45THH93PXyz1Z4Kq:
> > to=,
> > relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26]:25, delay=4.8,
> > delays=3.3/0.04/0.62/0.84, dsn=5.5.0, status=bounced (Protocol error: host
> >
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> Jun 19 09:52:43 mail-cvk postfix/smtp[32063]: 45THH93PXyz1Z4Kq:
> to=,
> relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26]:25, delay=4.8,
> delays=3.3/0.04/0.62/0.84, dsn=5.5.0, status=bounced (Protocol error: host
> gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26] said: 250 2.1.5
* Viktor Dukhovni :
> The correct reply to "DATA" is "354" not "250". Something is awfully
> out of sync if Gmail is returning "250" in response to "DATA".
>
> That's presumably a response for one of the recipients, so Gmail
> sent one more response than Postfix expects, or Gmail received
> one
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 15:41 Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:43:13AM +0530, Durga Prasad Malyala wrote:
>
> > I am seeing a peculiar problem in on of our servers. Some mails in the
> > queue stay there forever. of course they are very few just 20 or 30 in
> > a month.
>
>
* Viktor Dukhovni :
> > On Jun 19, 2019, at 6:37 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >
> > The error message says:
> >
> > Protocol error: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26] said: 250
> > 2.1.5 OK w9si551343wmd.47 - gsmtp (in reply to DATA command)
>
> Ralf, your inattention to detail
On 19.06.19 12:37, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I have a strange problem with mails to GMAIL.
A user sent out mails to 90 recipients, half of which are @gmail.com,
and those mostly bounced:
Jun 19 09:52:43 mail-cvk postfix/smtp[32063]: 45THH93PXyz1Z4Kq:
to=,
> On Jun 19, 2019, at 6:37 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> The error message says:
>
> Protocol error: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26] said: 250
> 2.1.5 OK w9si551343wmd.47 - gsmtp (in reply to DATA command)
Ralf, your inattention to detail disappoints me. :-(
The correct
> "250 2.0.0 OK 1560930762 l7si9891184wrx.266 - gsmtp"
>
> is acceptable, while
>
> "250 2.1.5 OK w9si551343wmd.47 - gsmtp"
>
> is a protocol error?
I fired up ye olde grep on mail.python.org and found some incidients
there as well:
# zegrep -c "status=bounced \(Protocol error: host
I have a strange problem with mails to GMAIL.
A user sent out mails to 90 recipients, half of which are @gmail.com,
and those mostly bounced:
Jun 19 09:52:43 mail-cvk postfix/smtp[32063]: 45THH93PXyz1Z4Kq:
to=,
relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[173.194.76.26]:25, delay=4.8,
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:43:13AM +0530, Durga Prasad Malyala wrote:
> I am seeing a peculiar problem in on of our servers. Some mails in the
> queue stay there forever. of course they are very few just 20 or 30 in
> a month.
That's what the "hold" queue is for.
> 3291B6063914! 54880 Mon Jun
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 11:47 Olivier wrote:
> Durga Prasad Malyala writes:
>
> > Hello all,
> > I am seeing a peculiar problem in on of our servers. Some mails in the
> > queue stay there forever. of course they are very few just 20 or 30 in
> > a month.
> > most of them are from MAILER-DAEMON
>
On 18.06.19 21:15, Chris Pollock wrote:
I'd been told quite awhile back that the spf soft failure isn't a
problem by Centurylink Be that as it may I went into chat with
Centurylink tech support this afternoon. I had all the information that
I could think of to share with them. After over an
Durga Prasad Malyala writes:
> Hello all,
> I am seeing a peculiar problem in on of our servers. Some mails in the
> queue stay there forever. of course they are very few just 20 or 30 in
> a month.
> most of them are from MAILER-DAEMON
>
> 3291B6063914! 54880 Mon Jun 17 17:32:24
Hello all,
I am seeing a peculiar problem in on of our servers. Some mails in the
queue stay there forever. of course they are very few just 20 or 30 in
a month.
most of them are from MAILER-DAEMON
3291B6063914! 54880 Mon Jun 17 17:32:24 MAILER-DAEMON
26 matches
Mail list logo
