On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 09:25:29PM -0400, Bobby Mozumder wrote:
> My Postfix SMTP client, when it sends to my external relay server (connecting
> to port 587), does a core dump and outputs the following message:
>
> Apr 15 20:51:57 mail postfix/master[67497]: warning: process
>
My Postfix SMTP client, when it sends to my external relay server (connecting
to port 587), does a core dump and outputs the following message:
Apr 15 20:51:57 mail postfix/master[67497]: warning: process
/usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtp pid 67505 killed by signal 11
Apr 15 20:51:57 mail
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 02:58:44AM +0200, Vieri Di Paola wrote:
> > > The collate script seems to confirm that the non-delivery
> > > notifications have been sent out. I rest assured.
> >
> > And what is the output of:
> >
> > getent hosts $(
> > postconf -hx inet_interfaces
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 2:03 AM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:40:42AM +0200, Vieri Di Paola wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:35 AM Viktor Dukhovni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Not all log messages carry the queue-id. Use the collate.pl script
> > > to find any other
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:40:42AM +0200, Vieri Di Paola wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:35 AM Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
> >
> > Not all log messages carry the queue-id. Use the collate.pl script
> > to find any other pertinent log messages from 'smtp[13093]'.
>
> The collate script seems
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:42 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> You need to find out why 10.0.0.10 matches inet_interfaces or
> proxy_interfaces. Because that is why Postfix complains.
>
> Someting in /etc/hosts?
# grep -v ^# /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
::1 localhost
I guess I
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:35 AM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> Not all log messages carry the queue-id. Use the collate.pl script
> to find any other pertinent log messages from 'smtp[13093]'.
The collate script seems to confirm that the non-delivery
notifications have been sent out. I rest
Vieri Di Paola:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:18 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > You may want to check this:
> >
> > $ postconf transport_maps
> >
> > Output should list /etc/postfix/transport
> >
> > $ postmap -q mydomain.org /etc/postfix/transport
> >
> > Output should show mydomain.org
> On Apr 15, 2020, at 6:18 PM, Vieri Di Paola wrote:
>
> tail -n 1000 custom_email.log | grep "^Apr 15" | grep "3B4F21240B1"
> postfix/smtpd[13316]: 3B4F21240B1: client=unknown[10.1.1.1]
> postfix/cleanup[13083]: 3B4F21240B1:
> message-id=<1586931633.63377.9971225...@external.org>
>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:18 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> You may want to check this:
>
> $ postconf transport_maps
>
> Output should list /etc/postfix/transport
>
> $ postmap -q mydomain.org /etc/postfix/transport
>
> Output should show mydomain.org smtp:[10.0.0.10]
# postconf
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:13 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Vieri Di Paola:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:35 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >
> > > Vieri Di Paola:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm using postfix as an smtp filter (antispam) which then forwards the
> > > > messages to another mail server
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 02:01:49PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> I'd be interested in reading more on this if you know any references.
> Over 512 bytes of MX records seems like a lot, and seems like a really
> bad idea for a domain configuration since there have always been (as
> you noted, with
* Rich Felker:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 07:19:43PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Rich Felker:
>>
>> > This is true for users running local nameservers, which ideally will
>> > eventually be everyone, but at present that's far from the case.
>> > Differences like concurrent attempts from
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 07:19:43PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Rich Felker:
>
> > This is true for users running local nameservers, which ideally will
> > eventually be everyone, but at present that's far from the case.
> > Differences like concurrent attempts from multiple nameservers
* Rich Felker:
> This is true for users running local nameservers, which ideally will
> eventually be everyone, but at present that's far from the case.
> Differences like concurrent attempts from multiple nameservers and/or
> lack of TCP fallback on TC are what makes netstat fast on musl vs
>
Wietse Venema:
> Vieri Di Paola:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:35 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >
> > > Vieri Di Paola:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm using postfix as an smtp filter (antispam) which then forwards the
> > > > messages to another mail server with user mailboxes.
> > > >
> > > >
Vieri Di Paola:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:35 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > Vieri Di Paola:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm using postfix as an smtp filter (antispam) which then forwards the
> > > messages to another mail server with user mailboxes.
> > >
> > > This server has private IP addr.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:35 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Vieri Di Paola:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using postfix as an smtp filter (antispam) which then forwards the
> > messages to another mail server with user mailboxes.
> >
> > This server has private IP addr. 10.0.0.1, and the mailbox server has
>
Vieri Di Paola:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using postfix as an smtp filter (antispam) which then forwards the
> messages to another mail server with user mailboxes.
>
> This server has private IP addr. 10.0.0.1, and the mailbox server has
> private IP addr. 10.0.0.10.
> So, external e-mails are first
On 14/04/2020 18:42, Rick King wrote:
We have a customer that occasionally receives messages like this...
Return-Path:
From: "Free iPad "
To:
Subject:Free iPad
Any suggestions welcome! Thank you!
On 15.04.20 11:09, Allen Coates wrote:
I am no expert on pattern matching, but could you
On 14/04/2020 18:42, Rick King wrote:
> Hello List!
>
> We have a customer that occasionally receives messages like this...
>
> Return-Path:
> From: "Free iPad "
> To:
> Subject:Free iPad
> Any suggestions welcome! Thank you!
>
>
I am no expert on pattern matching, but could you
Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2020, 05:05 -0400 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:36:26AM +0200, Christian wrote:
>
>
> I don't yet have access to systems with this recent a glibc to
> confirm
> the above, but this is likely relevant to Postfix administrators who
> enable DANE. You
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:36:26AM +0200, Christian wrote:
> > I don't yet have access to systems with this recent a glibc to confirm
> > the above, but this is likely relevant to Postfix administrators who
> > enable DANE. You may need to explicitly add the "trust-ad" option to
> > your
Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2020, 02:28 -0400 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:59:51PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>
> but if that is incompatible with other stub resolver libraries on the
> same machine, you may need a private musl-specific configuration file.
>
> My money is
Hi,
I'm using postfix as an smtp filter (antispam) which then forwards the
messages to another mail server with user mailboxes.
This server has private IP addr. 10.0.0.1, and the mailbox server has
private IP addr. 10.0.0.10.
So, external e-mails are first received by this filter and then
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:59:51PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> but if that is incompatible with other stub resolver libraries on the
> same machine, you may need a private musl-specific configuration file.
>
> My money is on this being unnecessary. I'll let [you] know what I find
> from
26 matches
Mail list logo
