Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Feb 15, 2021, at 9:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > I just verified that TLS works when running "sendmail -bs" as user
> > 'postfix' from inetd. But I agree that this mode of operation is
> > suitable only for extraordinary cases.
>
> How was the SMTP server able to lo
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Eugene Podshivalov wrote:
> > Generic approach to system administration and access control
> > reconfiguration at runtime (without service reload).
>
> If you want something more generic than what's already in postfix, the
> next level up is probably iptables.
+1. I agr
> On Feb 15, 2021, at 9:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> I just verified that TLS works when running "sendmail -bs" as user
> 'postfix' from inetd. But I agree that this mode of operation is
> suitable only for extraordinary cases.
How was the SMTP server able to load the certificate chain? The
On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 01:51 +0300, Eugene Podshivalov wrote:
> Generic approach to system administration and access control
> reconfiguration at runtime (without service reload).
>
If you want something more generic than what's already in postfix, the
next level up is probably iptables.
Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Feb 15, 2021, at 9:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> >> Is it by chance possible that tcp wrappers will be supported in future at
> >> least as an optionally compiled feature?
> >
> > If you must, you can run "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs" as user "postfix"
> > under TCP Wrappe
> On Feb 15, 2021, at 8:51 PM, Eugene Podshivalov wrote:
>
> Generic approach to system administration and access control reconfiguration
> at runtime (without service reload).
If your max_idle and max_use are not too high, Postfix does
not need to be "reloaded" to detect changes in main.cf.
Ea
> On Feb 15, 2021, at 9:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> Is it by chance possible that tcp wrappers will be supported in future at
>> least as an optionally compiled feature?
>
> If you must, you can run "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs" as user "postfix"
> under TCP Wrappers from inetd.
Please don't re
Eugene Podshivalov:
> Is it by chance possible that tcp wrappers will be supported in future at
> least as an optionally compiled feature?
If you must, you can run "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs" as user "postfix"
under TCP Wrappers from inetd.
I prefer to spend my limited development cycles on things t
Generic approach to system administration and access control
reconfiguration at runtime (without service reload).
вт, 16 февр. 2021 г. в 01:24, Bob Proulx :
> Eugene Podshivalov wrote:
> > Is it by chance possible that tcp wrappers will be supported in future at
> > least as an optionally compile
Eugene Podshivalov wrote:
> Is it by chance possible that tcp wrappers will be supported in future at
> least as an optionally compiled feature?
One can't say something will never happen. But why would it be
needed?
As others have said Postfix already supports all of the same feature
set but in
Is it by chance possible that tcp wrappers will be supported in future at
least as an optionally compiled feature?
пн, 8 февр. 2021 г. в 23:00, Eugene Podshivalov :
> Thanks, Noel! Your comments are helpful indeed.
>
> пн, 8 февр. 2021 г. в 22:37, Noel Jones :
>
>>
>> On 2/8/2021 11:45 AM, Eugene
11 matches
Mail list logo
