Sorry, I have forgotten too:
On 19 Apr 2020 and 23 May 2020:
- https://github.com/vdukhovni/danecheck/issues/8
"
Dear Viktor,
There are several problems:
- http://posftix.org/ does not work
- https://posftix.org/ does not work
- https://www.posftix.org/ does not work
Only
Sorry, I have forgotten too:
On 19 Apr 2020 and 23 May 2020:
- https://github.com/vdukhovni/danecheck/issues/8
"
Dear Viktor,
There are several problems:
- http://posftix.org/ does not work
- https://posftix.org/ does not work
- https://www.posftix.org/ does not work
Only
Dear all,
I wish you a Happy New Year 2022!
I am very happy to read all messages about the postfix.org website, thanks to
relaunch this very old problem!
In 2019, more than 2 years, I have already informed the problem in users and
dev list:
-
Thanks for your reply!
But it is not new, I have already informed the users and dev lists in 2019:
- https://marc.info/?l=postfix-users=157387961926385=2
"
In the same time, it does not work:
- http://postfix.org/
- https://postfix.org/
- https://www.postfix.org/
"
One reply:
Thanks for your reply!
I think that the best solution is to do all announcements when you publish, no
several days after!
Mirrors are slow and a lot of are dead, I have requested cleaning:
https://marc.info/?l=postfix-users=164223870828454=2
Look the problem here, for example:
On Saturday, January 15, 2022 8:08:51 PM EST Robert Siemer wrote:
> > > Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate
> > > and sign the checksum and once to write it out with the result of the
> > > previous step in the headers.¹
> >
> > Prepending a header does not
> > Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate
> > and sign the checksum and once to write it out with the result of the
> > previous step in the headers.¹
>
> Prepending a header does not require rewriting the message body.
> Postfix queue files support efficient
> > So far I see that the after-queue content filter mechanism
> > (FILTER_README) forces you to write the email to disc again. (And
> > for no good reason, unfortunately: pipe should pass a read-only
> > file descriptor of the queue file to filter?s stdin. The filter
> > can use lseek() on that.)
Robert Siemer:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
>
> Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate
> and sign the checksum and once to write it out with the result of
> the previous step in the headers.?
>
> A DKIM signer can do
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 08:01:05PM +0100, Robert Siemer wrote:
> I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
No worries, you can do this with a milter, without storing
an extra copy of the complete message.
> Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate
>
It appears that Benny Pedersen said:
>On 2022-01-15 20:01, Robert Siemer wrote:
>
>> I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
>
>insane
agreed
>> A DKIM signer can do this by either keeping the message in memory (a
>> no-go for me) or write it to a file.
>
>will a mount point on
Robert Siemer wrote:
> Gmail allows 150MB. Ok? And with that they are right. That is not
> "insane". Insane is the opposite: to reject an email, because a
> single file attachment ended up a little bigger than expected. Total
> user experience disaster.
I think you have me confused with someone
Gmail allows 150MB. Ok? And with that they are right. That is not “insane”.
Insane is the opposite: to reject an email, because a single file attachment
ended up a little bigger than expected. Total user experience disaster.
So could we concentrate on answering my question or solving the
On 2022-01-15 20:01, Robert Siemer wrote:
I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
insane
Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate
and sign the checksum and once to write it out with the result of the
previous step in the headers.¹
what is your
Robert Siemer wrote:
> I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
I know you say you need this. But even if you had it would it
actually be useful to you?
DKIM is needed to interchange email with random email servers around
the Internet. Because said random servers will reject the
Hello everyone,
I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate and sign
the checksum and once to write it out with the result of the previous step in
the headers.¹
A DKIM signer can do this by either keeping the
I normally announce the code after the mirrors have
had some time to update.
Wietse
* neustrada...@hotmail.com:
> It is possible to add the certificate to have HTTPS for postfix.org?
Check the mailing list archives; this has been discussed mere days ago.
-Ralph
Hello Postfix team,
In first, I wish you a Happy New Year!
It is possible to remove dead mirrors?
- http://www.postfix.org/download.html
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neustradamus
Hello Postfix team,
In first, I wish you a Happy New Year!
It is possible to add the announcement?
- http://www.postfix.org/announcements.html
But it is here:
- http://www.postfix.org/download.html
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neustradamus
Hello Postfix team,
In first, I wish you a Happy New Year!
It is possible to add the certificate to have HTTPS for postfix.org?
Redirect all links http://www.postfix.org/* + http://postfix.org/* to
https://postfix.org/
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neustradamus
21 matches
Mail list logo
