Re: spam emails with "to:" line missing

2022-04-19 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 09:45:12PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote: > On 2022 Apr 15, at 16:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 04:30:19PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote: > > > >> However, it is *very* common for a BBC email to have a To header with > >> no email address in it at all, > > > > Thi

Re: spam emails with "to:" line missing

2022-04-19 Thread @lbutlr
On 2022 Apr 15, at 16:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 04:30:19PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote: > >> However, it is *very* common for a BBC email to have a To header with >> no email address in it at all, > > This violates RFC5322 and earlier versions. No it does not. > The "To:" h

Re: Prepend add extra symbol in header

2022-04-19 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 03:25:53PM -0300, SysAdmin EM wrote: > should also be corrected in the file sender_canonical? > > /@gmail.com/ nore...@kiusys.com > > /@gmail.cl/ nore...@kiusys.com > > /@hotmail.com/ nore...@kiusys.com > > /@outlook.com/ nore...@kiusys.com > > /@satena.com/ nore...@ki

Re: TLS reporting

2022-04-19 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 05:33:50PM -0700, Dan Mahoney wrote: > Does postfix have any support for TLS reporting (RFC8460)? > > Technically, one need not be using MTA-STS to benefit from this. We > get monitoring of this with our dmarc monitoring provider, and it > feels like it would be useful to

TLS reporting

2022-04-19 Thread Dan Mahoney
Hey there, Does postfix have any support for TLS reporting (RFC8460)? Technically, one need not be using MTA-STS to benefit from this. We get monitoring of this with our dmarc monitoring provider, and it feels like it would be useful to send these reports as well. -Dan

Re: Prepend add extra symbol in header

2022-04-19 Thread Wietse Venema
SysAdmin EM: > Thanks for the help. > > should also be corrected in the file sender_canonical? > > /@gmail.com/ nore...@kiusys.com > ... > /@.*/ nore...@kiusys.com Sorry, I can't help you with that. Wietse

Re: Prepend add extra symbol in header

2022-04-19 Thread SysAdmin EM
Thanks for the help. should also be corrected in the file sender_canonical? /@gmail.com/ nore...@kiusys.com /@gmail.cl/ nore...@kiusys.com /@hotmail.com/ nore...@kiusys.com /@outlook.com/ nore...@kiusys.com /@satena.com/ nore...@kiusys.com /@mayair.com/ nore...@kiusys.com /@gmail.co/ nore..

Re: Prepend add extra symbol in header

2022-04-19 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On 19 Apr 2022, at 10:22 am, Wietse Venema wrote: > > If you must do this, why not copy the entire From: value? > >/^From:(.+@example\.com\b.+) Reply-To:$1 > > Note: the \b matches a word boundary, and the \. matches . instead > of every character. Since '\b' will also match before a

Re: Prepend add extra symbol in header

2022-04-19 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: > SysAdmin EM: > > Hi!! > > > > I am using the prepend option as follows: > > > > / From: (.*@mydomain.com)/ PREPEND Reply to: $1 > > > > When the mail arrives I see that it does this way: > > > > Reply-to: "nore...@equair.com.ec" < > > > I see an additional symbol added (<) >

Re: Prepend add extra symbol in header

2022-04-19 Thread Wietse Venema
SysAdmin EM: > Hi!! > > I am using the prepend option as follows: > > / From: (.*@mydomain.com)/ PREPEND Reply to: $1 > > When the mail arrives I see that it does this way: > > Reply-to: "nore...@equair.com.ec" < > I see an additional symbol added (<) The '<' was already present in the From:

Prepend add extra symbol in header

2022-04-19 Thread SysAdmin EM
Hi!! I am using the prepend option as follows: / From: (.*@mydomain.com)/ PREPEND Reply to: $1 When the mail arrives I see that it does this way: Reply-to: "nore...@equair.com.ec" <