On 27.06.2022 00:24, Wietse Venema wrote:
Maurizio Caloro:
setup also opendkim and will appear now the error "
*key data is not secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is
not the executing uid (115)* *or the superuser*"
it's seem that i have permission issue?
Look at the output
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:23:26PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> Is it safe to add something like this to my helo_checks.pcre:
>
> check_helo_access pcre:$config_directory/helo_checks.pcre
> /*.localdomain/ REJECT
This is a "glob" pattern, it is not a valid PCRE pattern. It
also
Hi,
I was surprised to see I received an email with localhost.localdomain as
the envelope sender. It was a legitimate email, but not from my mail host.
Jun 16 16:15:29 armor policyd-spf[55040]: prepend Received-SPF: None
(mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=50.210.225.242;
Maurizio Caloro:
>
> setup also opendkim and will appear now the error "key data is not
> secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is not the executing
> uid (115)"
> it's seem that i have permission issue?
Look at the output from:
ls -ld /
Wietse
setup also opendkim and will appear now the error "key data is not
secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is not the executing
uid (115)"
it's seem that i have permission issue?
# opendkim -V
opendkim: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0
Compiled with OpenSSL 1.1.1n 15 Mar 2022
Dnia 26.06.2022 o godz. 13:09:24 Wietse Venema pisze:
> > Can't this be even simpler? Does it really need to define a dedicated
> > transport and entry in master.cf?
> > Can't l...@example.com be just an alias that pipes mail to the "mailbot"
> > script directly?
>
> Then, the address could be
Jaroslaw Rafa:
> Dnia 25.06.2022 o godz. 21:30:35 Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
> > But you don't need a catchall for the problem at hand. Why not just
> >
> > main.cf:
> > mailbot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
> >
> > virtual:
> > l...@example.com luc@hidden.invalid
> >
Dnia 25.06.2022 o godz. 21:30:35 Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
> But you don't need a catchall for the problem at hand. Why not just
>
> main.cf:
> mailbot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
>
> virtual:
> l...@example.com luc@hidden.invalid
>
> transport:
>
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 07:45:47AM -0400, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> raf:
> > Also, is .= the best notation? Would += be better?
>
> https://marc.info/?l=postfix-users=164779562215790=2
>
> Wietse
Of course.
cheers,
raf
Ralph Seichter:
> Hello list.
>
> I am currently pondering the continued usefulness of the restriction
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> ...
> check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/recipient_access
> ...
>
> with the content of /etc/postfix/recipient_access (1) being:
>
>
Hello list.
I am currently pondering the continued usefulness of the restriction
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/recipient_access
...
with the content of /etc/postfix/recipient_access (1) being:
/[@!%].*[@!%]/ REJECT
As per RFC 5322,
raf:
> Also, is .= the best notation? Would += be better?
https://marc.info/?l=postfix-users=164779562215790=2
Wietse
12 matches
Mail list logo