Hi,
I'm using postfix (postmulti) with amavisd and trying to have separate
content filters based on the domain so I can make decisions on the destiny
of the email from within amavisd. Currently all mail is processed by the
same amavisd policy_bank. The problem now is that mail is being sent
But it seems that all the useful information is already shown in the
dovecot log line (unless we want to differentiate SASL vs IMAP auth
failures for some reason).
Eugene
On 17.05.2023 14:06, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
[ Charset
Tom Reed via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-17 09:31:
On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/
You must configure trusted ARC signers.
You can't blindly trust ARC just like you can't blindly trust SPF
May I ask what policyd or
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-17 09:28:
On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/
You must configure trusted ARC signers. You can't blindly trust ARC
just like you can't blindly trust SPF
i recheck my
On 17/05/2023 08:18, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 16.05.23 22:11, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote:
For OpenDMARC this setting:
SPFSelfValidate true
this only causes opendmarc to resolve SPF itself instead of using existing
Authentication-Results: header.
Actually (from
17.05.23, 13:20 +0200, Tom Reed via Postfix-users:
multiple items for a given directive, "," or space or "," + space all are
valid delimiters. Am I right? Such as the following.
Yes. From the doc[1]:
| Specify a list of restrictions, separated by commas
| and/or whitespace.
Tom Reed via Postfix-users:
>
> Hello,
>
> multiple items for a given directive, "," or space or "," + space all are
> valid delimiters. Am I right? Such as the following.
No, it is different for some.
> smtpd_relay_restrictions =
>
Hello,
multiple items for a given directive, "," or space or "," + space all are
valid delimiters. Am I right? Such as the following.
smtpd_relay_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,defer_unauth_destination
smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
[ Charset ISO-8859-2 converted... ]
> >On 2023-05-16 at 12:19:03 UTC-0400 (Tue, 16 May 2023 18:19:03 +0200)
> >V?ctor Rubiella Monfort via Postfix-users
> >is rumored to have said:
> >>For example for imap/pop login failures dovecot log email account
>
You are ignoring my response. That is rude. Stop spamming
the postfix-users list with your repeated information.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/
You must configure trusted ARC signers.
You can't blindly trust ARC just like you can't blindly trust SPF
On 17.05.23 15:31, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote:
May I ask what policyd or
Now i added DNSSEC. Currently it is being registra job. 10 minutes ago,
i did make some DS record at Cloudfalre.
Thanks to Joachim, Patrick and raf ^^^
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe
On 17.05.23 10:43, lty--- via Postfix-users wrote:
May 16 08:41:14 smtp3 postfix-sen/qmgr[27776]: 3420CA2062F:
from=, size=56791841, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
May 16 08:41:31 smtp3 postfix-sen/smtp[10076]: 3420CA2062F:
to=, relay=x.x.x.x[x.x.x.x]:25, delay=18,
delays=0.52/0/0.1/17, dsn=5.0.0,
On 17.05.23 09:09, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote:
I found that, after I enable opendmarc to reject messages, there are some
issues for list addresses. for example, this rejected message shows:
: host mx1.dkinbox.com[193.106.250.86] said: 550 5.7.1
rejected by DMARC policy for
> On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
>>dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/
>
> You must configure trusted ARC signers.
> You can't blindly trust ARC just like you can't blindly trust SPF
>
May I ask what policyd or milter you use for SPF checks?
--
sent from
On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/
You must configure trusted ARC signers.
You can't blindly trust ARC just like you can't blindly trust SPF
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I
> SPF is designed for validating envelope from: and should not be used for
> header From:
>
> Microsoft attempt to create SPF/2 has failed and should not be used
> either.
>
That's OK. thanks for the info.
--
sent from https://dkinbox.com/
___
On 16.05.23 22:11, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote:
For OpenDMARC this setting:
SPFSelfValidate true
this only causes opendmarc to resolve SPF itself instead of using existing
Authentication-Results: header.
Can it handle the case when incoming message has rewritten
envelope address by
On 2023-05-16 at 12:19:03 UTC-0400 (Tue, 16 May 2023 18:19:03 +0200)
Víctor Rubiella Monfort via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
For example for imap/pop login failures dovecot log email account
that produces the failure.
On 16.05.23 13:57, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
If you are
19 matches
Mail list logo
