On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 07:34:48AM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
wrote:
> So that the first hop looks like this:
>
> Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by mail.xxx.yyy (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E011B0
> for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 07:04:42 +0200 (CEST)
Try
Dear Fourhundred,
Am 09.08.23 um 07:34 schrieb Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users:
my email was flagged as spam by Microsoft.
I have the received email, together with all the headers that Microsoft
added. Specifically the item: X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info:
I have found a tool on gith
Hello,
my email was flagged as spam by Microsoft.
I have the received email, together with all the headers that Microsoft
added. Specifically the item: X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info:
I have found a tool on github, which attempts to decode this convoluted
item (https://github.com/mgeeky/deco
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> >> > We're only doing basic spam protection for them,
> >>
> >> What is the nature of the "basic spam protection"? Can it be done
> >> pre-queue?
>
> On 07.08.23 15:19, Alex via Postfix-users wrote:
> >Yes, most likely, I would think. It's a basic spama
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 01:28:51PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> >> > We're only doing basic spam protection for them,
> >>
> >> What is the nature of the "basic spam protection"? Can it be done
> >> pre-queue?
>
> On 07.08.23 15:19, Alex via Postfix-users wrote:
> >Y
> We're only doing basic spam protection for them,
What is the nature of the "basic spam protection"? Can it be done
pre-queue?
On 07.08.23 15:19, Alex via Postfix-users wrote:
Yes, most likely, I would think. It's a basic spamassassin setup with a few
rules looking for specific patterns, as
