Thank you. I forgot the other parameters that are possible...
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. August 2023 um 20:04 Uhr
> Von: "Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users"
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: [pfx] Re: smtpd_command_filter: Bounce-never regex sample wrong?
>
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at
Hello!
The documentation patch seems to suggest that there are potential
futures in which the parameter also restricts non-SMTP message ingres,
or even delivery after alias expansion for addresses not listed in the
table.
Well, based on previous messages on this thread, I thought this was
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 04:14:33PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> However, neither eventuality is at all likely. My take is that it would
> not be an unwelcome breaking change to apply the table in any context
> other than SMTP ingres.
s/would not be/would be/
--
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:01:35PM +0200, Étienne Miret via Postfix-users wrote:
> Anyway, I promised a documentation patch that would make this more
> explicit, here it is! Sorry it took me a little long to do it, as I have
> been busy on other issues.
The documentation patch seems to suggest
Hello,
There is nothing that prevents local_recipient_maps from being used elsewhere.
The need to do so just hasn't come up.
To be fair, I don’t have any use for this either. It’s just I had a
misconfiguration on my side, a user wouldn’t get their mails (well,
myself actually, the
