[pfx] Re: Address family for hostname not supported?

2023-09-17 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:31:59AM +1000, Phil Biggs via Postfix-users wrote: > >From what I could understand, it seems the recommendation was to return the > same value as Linux. Is that something postfix would need to take into > account? It also seems to be informational only. The real

[pfx] Re: Address family for hostname not supported?

2023-09-17 Thread Phil Biggs via Postfix-users
Monday, September 18, 2023, 10:01:51 AM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 09:38:49AM +1000, Phil Biggs via Postfix-users wrote: >> > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net/2022-October/002556.html >> >> Ah, just saw this but it's getting way beyond my

[pfx] Re: Address family for hostname not supported?

2023-09-17 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 09:38:49AM +1000, Phil Biggs via Postfix-users wrote: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net/2022-October/002556.html > > Ah, just saw this but it's getting way beyond my skill level :-) > > Does that invalidate the bug report? The change in error number and

[pfx] Re: [ext] list.sys4.de fails with starttls

2023-09-17 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 06:20:53PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users wrote: > Yesterday we upgraded LE certs and it seems – we haven't had time to > investigate in that yet – SELinux bite Postfix where it shouldn't. > Astonishingly SELinux has been running like that for 193 days and

[pfx] Re: [ext] list.sys4.de fails with starttls

2023-09-17 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
STARTTLS should be back to normal again. My tests suceeded and I'll give it another shot when I'm home. At the moment I'm on a rather longish train ride and internet is shaky - at best. Yesterday we upgraded LE certs and it seems – we haven't had time to investigate in that yet – SELinux bite

[pfx] Re: [ext] list.sys4.de fails with starttls

2023-09-17 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
In my case, all STARTTLS commands fail. Delivery succeeds after re-connecting with plaintext. Apparently, not all connections are retried in plaintext. To work around one could say: smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps = cidr:{ {188.68.34.52 starttls}

[pfx] Re: [ext] list.sys4.de fails with starttls

2023-09-17 Thread Jim Popovitch via Postfix-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 2023-09-17 at 15:24 +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra via Postfix-users wrote: > On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:32:06 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users > wrote: > > > > * Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users : > > > Mar 17 11:38:31 localhost

[pfx] Re: [ext] list.sys4.de fails with starttls

2023-09-17 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra via Postfix-users
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:32:06 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users wrote: > > * Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users : > > Mar 17 11:38:31 localhost postfix/smtpd[22150]: lost connection after > > STARTTLS from list.sys4.de[2a03:4000:10:51d:b8ce:63ff:feca:a5a0] > > Mar 17 12:09:10 localhost