[pfx] Re: Filterring out invalidu...@mydomain.com

2023-10-04 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:44:43AM +0700, Olivier via Postfix-users wrote: > How is it possible to configure Postfix to filter messages of the > form: from invalidu...@mydomain.com to validu...@mydomain.com > > I have been receiving quite a lot recently and they are trash.

[pfx] Filterring out invalidu...@mydomain.com

2023-10-04 Thread Olivier via Postfix-users
Hi, How is it possible to configure Postfix to filter messages of the form: from invalidu...@mydomain.com to validu...@mydomain.com I have been receiving quite a lot recently and they are trash. Best regasrds, Olivier -- ___ Postfix-users mailing

[pfx] Re: smtpd rate limiting

2023-10-04 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 04:18:43PM +0200, Kevin Cousin via Postfix-users wrote: > > We have a solution for that, and that is not slowing down message > > arrivals or speeding up deliveries. > > Mails are arriving fast, they arrive quicly enough to fill the active > queue. SHOULD all these

[pfx] Re: smtpd rate limiting

2023-10-04 Thread Kevin Cousin via Postfix-users
Hi > Can you answer one question: is mail arriving too fast, or are >  > deliveries too slow? If the problem is the latter, then your queue >  > may be full of MAILER-DAEMON messages. >  > We have a solution for that, and that is not slowing down message >  > arrivals or speeding up deliveries.

[pfx] Re: smtpd rate limiting

2023-10-04 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 06:29:08PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users > > wrote: > > > > > > My first wild guess is setting in_flow_delay to a higher value might > > > > help. Note this may be completely

[pfx] Re: smtpd rate limiting

2023-10-04 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 06:29:08PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users > wrote: > > > > My first wild guess is setting in_flow_delay to a higher value might > > > help. Note this may be completely inappropriate for your specific > > > application. > > >