Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> I see this was changed in 20120222
> Cleanup: when multiple DNSBLs block an SMTP client, the
> postscreen "reject" message now gives credit to the DNSBL
> with the largest weight, instead of the DNSBL that replies
>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:08:37AM -0500, B Williams wrote:
> Huge thank you to Viktor and Tom for their ideas. I ended up using
> this route (without the hash maps as the config doesn’t change much).
Note that Tom's suggestion doesn't quite work as advertised.
The configuration parameters:
On 16.10.23 10:33, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote:
And in my logs I have this example of blocked email(a non-spam one):
blocked using dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
blocked using spam.dnsbl.anonmails.de
So only two of them, not four. And I want to know if there is a way to
log more
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> >> On 16.10.23 10:33, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote:
> >> > And in my logs I have this example of blocked email(a non-spam one):
> >> >
> >> >blocked using dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
> >> >blocked using spam.dnsbl.anonmails.de
> >> >
> >> >So
On 16.10.23 10:33, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote:
> And in my logs I have this example of blocked email(a non-spam one):
>
>blocked using dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
>blocked using spam.dnsbl.anonmails.de
>
>So only two of them, not four. And I want to know if there is a way to
>log more
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> On 16.10.23 10:33, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote:
> >postscreen_blacklist_action = drop
> >postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 4
> >postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce
> >postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
> >zen.spamhaus.org
> >b.barracudacentral.org
> >
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:33:34AM +0300, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > Hi, I'm using postscreen dnsbl configuration to block some spam:
> >
> > postscreen_blacklist_action = drop
> > postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 4
> > postscreen_dnsbl_action =
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:33:34AM +0300, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote:
> Hi, I'm using postscreen dnsbl configuration to block some spam:
>
> postscreen_blacklist_action = drop
> postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 4
> postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce
> postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
>
Dnia 15.10.2023 o godz. 08:52:18 B Williams via Postfix-users pisze:
> There is a spam network that has figured out that they can bypass my spam
> filtering service by ignoring the MX record and just sending mail directly
> to the mail server. Pretty sneaky.
[...]
> Open to any and all ideas!
The
Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-10-16 09:33:
And in my logs I have this example of blocked email(a non-spam one):
blocked using dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
blocked using spam.dnsbl.anonmails.de
if this 2 dnsbl lists ips in dnswl.org then its time to remove in
postscreen,
Hi, I'm using postscreen dnsbl configuration to block some spam:
postscreen_blacklist_action = drop
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 4
postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
zen.spamhaus.org
b.barracudacentral.org
bl.spameatingmonkey.net
bl.spamcop.net
11 matches
Mail list logo
