Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
> I think you are absolutely correct in your analysis.
> I've been looking over the code and, although there is a lot I
> still don't understand, your yesterday patch seems more a (good)
> workaround to the real problem.
> I also located the
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 11/12/2023 a las 22:30:
Wietse Venema:
Patch below.
Carlos Velasco:
Tested patch against 3.8.3, now it works as expected. Thank you.
No duplicated "Received-SPF" and *removing "Received" in position
1 is now not the own generated, is really the
Wietse Venema:
> Patch below.
Carlos Velasco:
> Tested patch against 3.8.3, now it works as expected. Thank you.
> No duplicated "Received-SPF" and *removing "Received" in position
> 1 is now not the own generated, is really the first one Received
> seen in the milter.*
Your second comment (text
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> >> > Bill Cole via Postfix-users escribi? el 11/12/2023 a las 15:31:
> >> >> On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
> >> >> Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
> >> >> is rumored to have said:
> >> >> [...]
> >> >>> And doing
> Bill Cole via Postfix-users escribi? el 11/12/2023 a las 15:31:
>> On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
>> Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
>> is rumored to have said:
>> [...]
>>> And doing the same work in 2 different places can be called software
>>>
On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
And doing the same work in 2 different places can be called software
efficiency?
Bill Cole via Postfix-users escribió el 11/12/2023 a las 15:31:
since it was
Bill Cole via Postfix-users:
> On 2023-12-11 at 09:37:39 UTC-0500 (Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:37:39 +0100)
> Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Bill Cole via Postfix-users escribi? el 11/12/2023 a las 15:31:
> >> On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023
On 2023-12-11 at 09:37:39 UTC-0500 (Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:37:39 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Bill Cole via Postfix-users escribió el 11/12/2023 a las 15:31:
On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
>
> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribi? el 11/12/2023 a las 1:11:
> > Patch below.
> Tested patch against 3.8.3, now it works as expected. Thank you.
> No duplicated "Received-SPF" and removing "Received" in position 1 is now not
> the own generated, is
Bill Cole via Postfix-users escribió el 11/12/2023 a las 15:31:
On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
And doing the same work in 2 different places can be called software
efficiency?
No, but the
On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
And doing the same work in 2 different places can be called software
efficiency?
No, but the "fix" here would be a divergence from how Milter has worked
since
On 2023-12-10 at 16:16:27 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:16:27 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 10/12/2023 a las 21:53:
2. the "own Received" header not being passed to milter. I
understand
it works as expected, but
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 11/12/2023 a las 1:11:
Patch below.
Tested patch against 3.8.3, now it works as expected. Thank you.
No duplicated "Received-SPF" and removing "Received" in position 1 is now not
the own generated, is really the first one Received seen in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
