On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 12:58:38PM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> > On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 12:49:42PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
> > Postfix-users wrote:
> >
> > > In case of domains in relay_domains, the command could be even
> > >
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 07:21:53PM +0100, Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I thought almost all cloud providers use anycast these days,
> elminating the need to serve different IPs per region.
No. That's not the case. Anycast is a useful tool, but isn't the whole
story. The
I thought almost all cloud providers use anycast these days, elminating the
need to serve different IPs per region.
Joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
Gesendet: Samstag, 9. März 2024 18:42
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: [pfx] Re: mta-sts
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 12:49:42PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
> Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > In case of domains in relay_domains, the command could be even
> > postfix/relay, so one needs to exclude that one as well.
>
> Actually, no, the "relay"
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 10:46:17AM +0100, Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > Viktor Dukhovni:
> > not sufficient market pressure to make it a priority.
> Unfortunately yes, not yet.
> > various load balancers would need to do online DNSSEC signing
> Can you please elaborate why that
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 12:49:42PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> In case of domains in relay_domains, the command could be even
> postfix/relay, so one needs to exclude that one as well.
Actually, no, the "relay" transport is implemented by the smtp(8)
delivery agent,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> On 07.03.24 12:14, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> >The Postfix SMTP server counts only the recipients that it accepts,
> >not the ones that it rejects.
> >
> >That is, a DATA or BDAT command after all recipients are rejected
> >will result in a
Stephen Satchell via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-03-08 06:52:
grep relay= mail.log | grep -v relay=local
I can then use the message ID to get all the log information for
each questioned transaction.
Am I on the right road? Please disabuse me of any incorrect notions.
On 08.03.24 12:47,
On 07.03.24 12:14, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
The Postfix SMTP server counts only the recipients that it accepts,
not the ones that it rejects.
That is, a DATA or BDAT command after all recipients are rejected
will result in a "554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients".
So I guess
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> not sufficient market pressure to make it a priority.
Unfortunately yes, not yet.
> various load balancers would need to do online DNSSEC signing
Can you please elaborate why that should be required?
Thanks,
Joachim
___
10 matches
Mail list logo