[pfx] Re: old TLS client

2024-04-02 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 09:58:13AM +0200, Levente Birta via Postfix-users wrote: > > That's worth a try: > > > > 588 inet ... smtpd > > -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt > > -o smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols=TLSv1.2 > > ... > > Limiting to only TLSv1.2 did the

[pfx] Re: Thunderbird 91, Postfix 3.7.x, Debian 12, Virtual Mailbox Users, TLS with Letsencrypt, error improper command pipelining after helo

2024-04-02 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:11:03PM -0400, David Mehler wrote: > Here is the complete log of the connections, IPS x-d out, but I tried > twice, once on 587, once with smtps enabled. Any help appreciated. As noted by Wietse, debug (verbose) logging is not useful here. Just normal logging is quite

[pfx] Re: Thunderbird 91, Postfix 3.7.x, Debian 12, Virtual Mailbox Users, TLS with Letsencrypt, error improper command pipelining after helo

2024-04-02 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
David Mehler via Postfix-users: > Hello, > > Here is the complete log of the connections, IPS x-d out, but I tried > twice, once on 587, once with smtps enabled. Any help appreciated. We DID NOT ask for verbose logs. All we asked for is this: > postfix/submission/smtpd[1529]: improper command

[pfx] Re: Thunderbird 91, Postfix 3.7.x, Debian 12, Virtual Mailbox Users, TLS with Letsencrypt, error improper command pipelining after helo

2024-04-02 Thread David Mehler via Postfix-users
Hello, Here is the complete log of the connections, IPS x-d out, but I tried twice, once on 587, once with smtps enabled. Any help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. #tail -f /var/log/mail.log 2024-04-02T09:48:08.220604-04:00 hostname postfix/submission/smtpd[1529]: connect from

[pfx] Re: Is there a way to just quickly deliver "everything" to a file somewhere

2024-04-02 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:14:29AM -0400, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote: > Hey there all, > > I’m setting up a staging version of dayjob’s ticket system, and we’d > basically like postfix to still function, but instead of touching the > internet at all, just deliver everything to a single

[pfx] Re: Is there a way to just quickly deliver "everything" to a file somewhere

2024-04-02 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users: > Hey there all, > > I'm setting up a staging version of dayjob?s ticket system, and > we?d basically like postfix to still function, but instead of > touching the internet at all, just deliver everything to a single > file (or a maildir, I suppose), regardless of

[pfx] Re: Is there a way to just quickly deliver "everything" to a file somewhere

2024-04-02 Thread Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-04-02 10:14: Hey there all, I’m setting up a staging version of dayjob’s ticket system, and we’d basically like postfix to still function, but instead of touching the internet at all, just deliver everything to a single file (or a maildir, I

[pfx] Is there a way to just quickly deliver "everything" to a file somewhere

2024-04-02 Thread Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users
Hey there all, I’m setting up a staging version of dayjob’s ticket system, and we’d basically like postfix to still function, but instead of touching the internet at all, just deliver everything to a single file (or a maildir, I suppose), regardless of if a file is invoked via sendmail, or a