[pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?

2024-05-02 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in <4vvgyx1yynzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: |Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: |> Looks like there is sufficient basis to make SMTPD_QUIT_NC rerquests |> thts from Postfix. Just need to figure out how to enable/disable |> this particular command based on the

[pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?

2024-05-02 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > Looks like there is sufficient basis to make SMTPD_QUIT_NC rerquests > thts from Postfix. Just need to figure out how to enable/disable > this particular command based on the Postfix and Milter protocol > versions. There is already some 'set' intersection code

[pfx] Re: long header folding and DKIM fails

2024-05-02 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2024-05-02 at 07:53:15 UTC-0400 (Thu, 2 May 2024 12:53:15 +0100) Tim Coote via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: What would have helped - and I’ve no idea how feasible this is - would be some tooling to pull out different versions of the message as they flow through the queues. This

[pfx] Re: long header folding and DKIM fails

2024-05-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
On 02.05.24 12:53, Tim Coote via Postfix-users wrote: I think that I’ve now fixed this in my domain, so I thought I’d just note the route to finding it, more as a comment on the complexity of working out what’s going on. After making a simple robot to send emails with long headers and

[pfx] Re: long header folding and DKIM fails

2024-05-02 Thread Tim Coote via Postfix-users
I think that I’ve now fixed this in my domain, so I thought I’d just note the route to finding it, more as a comment on the complexity of working out what’s going on. After making a simple robot to send emails with long headers and demonstrating how they broke in my production environment, I