Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 25.10.2017 um 20:55 schrieb Emanuel:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I use Postfix, clamav and spamassain to figth the spam in my server.
>>
>> I my custom_rules from spamassasin i add the following rule to give 100
>> points to emails that contain infected
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Greetings and a happy new year,
>
>
> I still am in a situation where I occasionally need to have an SMTP
> client (preferable Postfix's) talk through an SSH tunnel.
>
> I know we have the smtp(8) client, and we have the pipe(8) client for
>
Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
> Is there some way to use milter check in a type of conditional ?
> In my situation here, it can not be mandatory to each message.
> I'm asking this because some users here want to receive all messages without
> Spam verification.
>
> Part of
Claus Assmann ca+postfix-us...@esmtp.org wrote:
With SMTP there is no per-recipiet end-of-data reply, and a
reject reply will block mail for all recipients.
AFAICT PRDR can do that -- it's implemented in exim and some other MTA.
However, it's barely used...
One way to encourage its
Gyeong Deok Kwon kkd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello postfix community,
I have a postfix(from source code) + dovecot setup for my university
term-project.
I want postfix call my custom function whenever postfix receive mails,
but couln't find the function.
Can I know the function of handling
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Andrzej A. Filip:
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
[...]
In any case, using UNIX system account names with @ is a mistake,
and I will not put in a great deal of effort to make that easy.
IMHO it does make sense at big system shared
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Andrzej A. Filip:
Is it possible to make postfix handle OS usernames with @ in them?
How to do it?
Use virtual(8) instead of local(8).
Should I expect some problems selecting virtual mailer for deliveries to
j...@example.net via transport table?
[I
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
[...]
In any case, using UNIX system account names with @ is a mistake,
and I will not put in a great deal of effort to make that easy.
IMHO it does make sense at big system shared by a few+ loosely coupled
organizations or in server group sharing
Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:04:23AM +0200, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
Is it possible to make postfix handle OS usernames with @ in them?
The local(8) delivery agent does not support these. If you hand
these off to some other delivery agent
Is it possible to make postfix handle OS usernames with @ in them?
How to do it?
My question is inspired (closely related but not identical) by
http://serverfault.com/q/709153/163277
| Q: Postfix virtual domain mapping user for a user a linux name containing @
--
A. Filip
On 01/28/2014 03:10 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:21:01AM +0100, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
Do you plan to support SRV DNS records in a few years perspective?
What real problem does this solve? Developer cycles are finite
and must be spent wisely.
IMHO it would allow
On 01/27/2014 09:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
As part of making Zimbra more robust, we're abstracting our data layer.
Currently, LMTP delivery is configured to point at a specific mailstore,
which accepts delivery and stores the email in a SQL database. As part of
the
On 01/28/2014 12:38 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Andrzej A. Filip:
Do you plan to support SRV DNS records in a few years perspective?
What real problem does this solve? Developer cycles are finite
and must be spent wisely.
IMHO it would allow better configuration of (internet to internal
On 01/25/2014 02:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Francina Oates:
The lack of socks support is an increasingly serious shortcoming
of Postfix.
You are welcome to donate code.
Wietse
As I understand it requires passing preset LD_PRELOAD environment variable.
On 01/25/2014 02:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Andrzej A. Filip:
On 01/25/2014 02:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Francina Oates:
The lack of socks support is an increasingly serious shortcoming
of Postfix.
You are welcome to donate code.
As I understand it requires passing preset LD_PRELOAD
On 12/30/2013 04:55 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:09:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Indeed. SMTPUTF8 support involves more than the 1% that says I can
do SMTPUTF8 in the EHLO handshake. There is a whole list of RFCs
that need to be supported first.
I think the
On 12/29/2013 05:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Freek Dijkstra:
Hi all,
Postfix does not support international email addresses, such as
jos?@example.org, as described by RFC 6530-6532. To be precise, the
SMPTUTF8 (previously: UTF8SMTP) SMTP extension is not announced in the
EHLO response.
script/program from
~/.procmailrc.
*BUT*
system administrator (root) can get access to email before it is
encrypted so MUA-MUA (sender's email client-recipient's email client)
encryption it much safer/secure.
--
[plen: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
I found Rome a city of bricks and left
* documented.
One of milter *protocol* documentation is available in pmilter project
(pure perl milter) http://pmilter.sourceforge.net/
If you want milter API documentation for milter developers than look
into documentation provided in sendmail.
--
[plen: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
I
] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu : a...@xl.wp.pl
Man has made his bedlam; let him lie in it.
-- Fred Allen
20 matches
Mail list logo