On 01/05/2015 17:45, Benning, Markus wrote:
Hi,
if you are willed to test my pflogsumm fork and to provide some sample
loglines
i'll implement postscreen statistics.
You can find the project at Github:
https://github.com/benningm/saftpresse
I modularized the pflogsumm code into seperate
On 04/05/2015 10:45, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:59:10AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
Can you reproduce the problem by using -CAfile $cafile with
s_client(1)? I don't see how adding a trusted CA can break the
handshake if the CA is well formed.
Please provide more
On 30/04/2015 17:38, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:29:29AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
On 30/04/2015 10:17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:09:36AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
OK, I found the problem:
I had configured the smtp_tls_CAfile. Removing
On 30/04/2015 09:36, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
On 30 Apr 2015, at 08:25, Birta Levente blevi.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/04/2015 20:56, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:53:00PM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
I see many SSL_connect error for different domains which mail
service
On 30/04/2015 09:58, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:25:48AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
Perhaps some sort of middle-box is interfering with TLS on your
end. Also, what version of OpenSSL are you using?
Well your end can be anywhere between you and the Microsoft email
On 29/04/2015 20:56, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:53:00PM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
I see many SSL_connect error for different domains which mail service hosted
at microsoft:
Apr 28 10:32:12 srv1 postfix/smtp[18296]: SSL_connect error to
irs-ro.mail.eo.outlook.com
On 30/04/2015 10:17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:09:36AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
OK, I found the problem:
I had configured the smtp_tls_CAfile. Removing everything works fine.
Was the file malformed? I have a hard time imagining any non-empty
set of well-formed
Hello
I see many SSL_connect error for different domains which mail service
hosted at microsoft:
Apr 28 10:32:12 srv1 postfix/smtp[18296]: SSL_connect error to
irs-ro.mail.eo.outlook.com[213.199.154.87]:25: lost connection
Apr 28 10:32:12 srv1 postfix/smtp[18296]: 3lbZRv0VXQz1lvjB:
On 29/04/2015 16:06, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
On 29 Apr 2015, at 14:53, Birta Levente blevi.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I see many SSL_connect error for different domains which mail service hosted at
microsoft:
Apr 28 10:32:12 srv1 postfix/smtp[18296]: SSL_connect error to
irs
Hi all
Just curiosity: it's not unwanted to check postscreen_dnsbl for an IP
which is blacklisted in postscreen_access_list?
Nov 12 12:18:40 srv1 postfix/postscreen[26755]: CONNECT from
[94.177.23.227]:50497 to [176.223.199.54]:25
Nov 12 12:18:40 srv1 postfix/postscreen[26755]: BLACKLISTED
On 12/11/2014 14:21, Wietse Venema wrote:
Birta Levente:
Hi all
Just curiosity: it's not unwanted to check postscreen_dnsbl for an IP
which is blacklisted in postscreen_access_list?
That would be a waste of Postfix resources. It would make Postfix less
resistant against abuse from a known-bad
On 12/11/2014 15:53, Wietse Venema wrote:
Birta Levente:
Just curiosity: it's not unwanted to check postscreen_dnsbl for an IP
which is blacklisted in postscreen_access_list?
Note: don't use no double negatives.
Wietse:
That would be a waste of Postfix resources. It would make Postfix less
On 01/10/2014 18:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix will log all uses of any old default value that will
be affected by an incompatible change.
This is not implemented yet (I installed 20141001 snapshot)? Or there is
other way to see the affected parameters?
Thanks,
--
Levi
On 02/10/2014 14:17, Wietse Venema wrote:
Birta Levente:
On 01/10/2014 18:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix will log all uses of any old default value that will
be affected by an incompatible change.
This is not implemented yet (I installed 20141001 snapshot)? Or there is
other way to see
On 02/10/2014 15:36, Wietse Venema wrote:
Birta Levente:
On 02/10/2014 14:17, Wietse Venema wrote:
Birta Levente:
On 01/10/2014 18:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix will log all uses of any old default value that will
be affected by an incompatible change.
This is not implemented yet (I
On 19/06/2014 16:57, Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote:
Hi,
I have a question for you more experienced admin , I have some
good abuse on my servers by IP listed in spam list , since I am using
postscreen to block those all is good , anyway I thought then a good
idea to just drop that traffic
On 03/06/2014 15:33, mancyb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi I have the same configuration and situation as the following:
http://serverfault.com/questions/132750/postfix-whitelist-before-recipient-restrictions
In short:
So i need a method of whitelisting ANY email that comes to domain.com, however
i
Hello
Could anyone download the latest 2.12-20140518 snapshot ?
thanks
--
Levi
On 15/05/2014 18:17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:32:22PM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
with all received mails I got warning: process
/usr/libexec/postfix/pipe pid 2078 killed by signal 11.
diff --git a/src/pipe/pipe.c b/src/pipe/pipe.c
index d63aca8..954fecf 100644
Hi
I use postfix 2.12-20140223 with virtual domains and users and dovecot LDA.
Now, if I upgrade to 20140508 or 20140406 (I haven't other snapshot
downloaded), with all received mails I got warning: process
/usr/libexec/postfix/pipe pid 2078 killed by signal 11.
I even tried to downgrade and
On 27/03/2014 13:49, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hello,
On our gateway server, we have:
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transportmap
/etc/postfix/transportmap
noa.gr relay:[vmail.noa.gr]
admin.noa.grrelay:[vmail.noa.gr]
nestor.noa.gr relay:[vmail.noa.gr]
On 27/03/2014 15:05, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 27/3/2014 2:04 μμ, Birta Levente wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#fallback_relay
Oh, thanks!
So, since the two conditions are by default fulfilled:
* In main.cf specify relay_transport = relay,
* In master.cf specify -o
On 27/03/2014 16:26, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 27/3/2014 4:10 μμ, Birta Levente wrote:
Not really IMHO
AFAIK since you have two entries with same key in transport map,
postfix will choose the first.
I think this is the way:
main.cf:
fallback_relay=[vmail1.noa.gr]
transport_map:
noa.gr
On 17/03/2014 10:32, Oriental Sensation wrote:
Hello group,
I have an issue with Postfix, Dovecot, OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC
cooperating together to achieve the following: Enable me to send Email
from my phone device after authenticating my identity with SASL.
It seems OpenDMARC is not
On 24/02/2014 02:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
Birta Levente:
On 21/02/2014 15:44, Wietse Venema wrote:
The behavior that you seem to prefer (throttle down
domains after 4XX reply to MAIL FROM) is really a bug in the
Postfix SMTP client implementation.
Postfix normally does
On 25/02/2014 10:10, Peer Heinlein wrote:
I'm thinking about a way how to bounce mails manually *without* setting
up a transport-map. Just bei CLI by the admin for a given Queue-ID.
I'd love having a postsuper-commando to move a mail into the bounce
queue. Is something like that possible?
On 25/02/2014 10:49, Andreas Schulze wrote:
Birta Levente:
Why not just delete from the queue?
from senders perspective that message is lost.
sometimes it's useful to clear bounce back to sender.
Yes, but you sould give some reason why is bounced ... which IMHO is
something permanent
On 25/02/2014 11:02, Andreas Schulze wrote:
Birta Levente:
Yes, but you sould give some reason why is bounced ... which IMHO is
something permanent ...
good point!
# postbounce queue-id reason
so you just set up one time some map and no more care about that
problem.
just this is unwanted
On 19/02/2014 17:15, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:00:25PM +0200, Birta Levente wrote:
With 2.12.20140209 I get hundreds defferals because:
Feb 19 05:21:59 srv2 postfix-slow/smtp[14313]: Untrusted TLS
connection established to mta5.am0.yahoodns.net[98.138.112.38]:25:
TLSv1
On 21/02/2014 13:41, Wietse Venema wrote:
Birta Levente:
plaintext retries possibily raising this to four.
We had considered special-casing 4XX replies as a reason to not
retry plaintext when TLS connections are lost. If your more complete
logs demonstrate a need to do that, we may add
On 21/02/2014 15:44, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema: The behavior that you seem to prefer (throttle down
domains after 4XX reply to MAIL FROM) is really a bug in the
Postfix SMTP client implementation.
Postfix normally does not throttle down domains after 4XX reply to
MAIL FROM. The bug is
On 19/02/2014 13:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
Birta Levente:
I have a problem with Postfix 2.12 Snapshot 20140209.
The qmgr_queue_throttle never fired up for destinations which go through
slow transport and obviously the delivery never suspended to these few
destinations.
Mails which go out
Hi
I have a problem with Postfix 2.12 Snapshot 20140209.
The qmgr_queue_throttle never fired up for destinations which go through
slow transport and obviously the delivery never suspended to these few
destinations.
Mails which go out normally, i.e. not through slow transport, seems to
throttle:
Hello
I have special transport for slow destinations. As documented if
transport_destination_rate_delay1s then applied for the same domain.
slow_initial_destination_concurrency=4
slow_destination_concurrency_limit=8
slow_destination_recipient_limit=10
slow_destination_rate_delay=2s
On 29/11/2013 21:20, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:40:03PM +0200, Birta Levente wrote:
I have special transport for slow destinations. As documented if
transport_destination_rate_delay1s then applied for the same
domain.
There is no such documentation. Setting it to 1s
On 17/07/2013 15:14, Roman Gelfand wrote:
Is there open source web based postfix server monitoring software?
I am looking to see if there is something to monitor queue size, etc...
Thanks in advance
mailgraph: http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/
queuegraph:
On 20/06/2013 13:49, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
On 19-06-2013 14:37, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Andreas Kasenides andr...@cymail.eu:
One of my mail servers (postfix 2.6) has been target of what seems to
me to be an attack.
The attacker tried to deliver messages to a non-existent user
On 19/06/2013 14:37, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Andreas Kasenides andr...@cymail.eu:
One of my mail servers (postfix 2.6) has been target of what seems to
me to be an attack.
The attacker tried to deliver messages to a non-existent user names
formed as a long hex
string. It only
On 23/04/2013 23:29, Nicolas HAHN wrote:
Dear Community,
*Version 0.9.13* of the tool has been released.
My tool is able to parse Postfix Logs (version 2.8 for now), generates
statistics, propose you a great EXTJS 4.1.3 Web 2.0 interface, offers
powerfull search features and so on...
It is
On 27/02/2013 21:54, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hello,
I have been building el6 (CentOS 6, RHEL 6) RPMs using J. Mudd's SRPMs
(http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.9/SRPMS/).
Does anyone have experience on building v2.10.x RPMs using the same
SRPMs? Are these safe, or has anyone adjusted the above
On 25/02/2013 12:38, marcos gonzalez wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the answer.
I'm reading how more of you separates http of mail, is correct but If
you needs the same SSL certificate for more than one domain, and for
legal questions you can't include all domains in one certificate, I
don't know If
On 25/02/2013 22:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 21:54, schrieb Birta Levente:
On 25/02/2013 12:38, marcos gonzalez wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the answer.
I'm reading how more of you separates http of mail, is correct but If you needs
the same SSL certificate for more
than one domain
On 21/02/2013 15:32, Erik Slagter wrote:
On 21-02-13 13:04, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
Please help me with the following. I have here a postfix system that
listens on multiple (external) interfaces, e.g. one of them receives
e-mail from the internet, one of them receives more or less secure mail
On 21/02/2013 15:56, Erik Slagter wrote:
On 21-02-13 14:41, Birta Levente wrote:
Postfix does start, but it doesn't honour the options, on both
instances. It's very simple to check, because I have postcheck report
another welcome string on every interface. Now it shows the default
welcome
Hi all
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf: unknown smtpd restriction: reject_unauth_destionation
Then in the maillog appears other errors, I think not related to above:
/proxymap[9105]: error: open /etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_forwardings.cf:
On 19/02/2013 11:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why do you reply off-list?
Am 19.02.2013 10:36, schrieb Birta Levente:
On 19/02/2013 11:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.02.2013 10:04, schrieb Birta Levente:
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf
On 19/02/2013 11:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why do you reply off-list?
Am 19.02.2013 10:36, schrieb Birta Levente:
On 19/02/2013 11:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.02.2013 10:04, schrieb Birta Levente:
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf
On 16/02/2013 12:59, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 15/2/2013 9:47 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
However, although I have successfully patched both mailgraph.pl and
mailgraph.cgi, it doesn't seem to work. (I did it twice to confirm.)
In the place of the Bounced-Virus-... etc diagram nothing appears
On 15/02/2013 16:14, Tom Loewen wrote:
EHLO list,
we have two WAN connections. One has the RDNS entry mx0.example.com the
other has mx1.example.com. Is there a way to setup postfix so that he
will reply with the correct hostname? I know that you can do this in
master.cf but the server is behind
On 15/02/2013 16:29, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know of any app like mailgraph, smart enough to combine data
from amavis and postfix and provide more detailed stats like:
Mail dropped by postscreen
Mail dropped by amavis as spam (through spamassassin)
Mail dropped by amavis as
On 05/02/2013 12:25, Geoff Shang wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Well the online tester made me aware of it, and some of my clients are
stuck with Outlook Express, thus my interest in it.
Outlook Express can use port 587 quite happily. You just have to tell
it to.
Hi all
How can I slow down deliveries to specified domain after temporary deferred?
I have a list for marketing purposes and 2/3 part of subscribed users is
on yahoo.
To yahoo, deliveries go through slow transport:
slow_destination_recipient_limit=10
slow_destination_concurrency_limit=1
On 29/01/2013 10:49, Titanus Eramius wrote:
Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:30:05 + skrev James Griffin
jmz.grif...@kode5.net:
* Birta Levente blevi.li...@gmail.com [2013-01-29 10:18:15 +0200]:
Hi all
How can I slow down deliveries to specified domain after temporary
deferred?
I have a list
On 07/12/2012 09:12, Luigi Rosa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a border SMTP server that has some local mailbox and relays other
recipients to an internal Exchange server
Relay to Exchange is done via transport file with something like this:
exchange.acme.com
On 11/10/2012 12:40, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 11.10.2012 11:12, schrieb Josef Karliak:
Hi,
I want all emails.
Email could be filtered as a spam (false positive). Co I want to have
an option to resend the email - copy it into a spool or so. First option
is that I've all emails in the
Hi all
How can direct through specified instance the locally submitted mail?
For example: server with 3 domains, 3 different ip address, 3 postfix
instances for this 3 domains with different myhostname, certs. Through
which instance going out the mail submitted with phpmailer for example?
(Of
On 02/08/2012 02:21, Wietse Venema wrote:
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.4.html]
Postfix stable release 2.9.4, and legacy releases 2.8.12, 2.7.11,
2.6.17 are available. They contain fixes and workarounds that are
://store.birkosan.com/mailgraph/mailgraph.cgi_postscreen.patch
http://store.birkosan.com/mailgraph/mailgraph.pl_postscreen.patch
Birta Levente
On 02/04/2012 14:31, Mikael Bak wrote:
Hi list,
I have configured an alternate transport route for mail going to
specific destination domains. I call this transport slowsmtp.
My problem is that I see no evidence in my logs that email sent to the
specific domains uses slowsmtp route for
Hello
I use postfix 2.7.2 with amavisd-new, opendkim and dk-milter. My problem
is dkim signature appear 2 times in mail header. It is ok? how can i fix
this?
thanks
Levi
On 16/02/2012 15:02, li...@coffeehabit.net wrote:
On 16/02/12 09:46, Birta Levente wrote:
Hello
I use postfix 2.7.2 with amavisd-new, opendkim and dk-milter.
I'm curious to know why you're using opendkim and dk-milter instead of
using the built-in DKIM signing/checking in amavisd-new?
I
On 18/06/2010 11:36, Antoine Nguyen wrote:
Hi all,
I'm facing a stupid situation and I'm looking for advises. I'm using a
postfix relay to filter viruses and spams. All is working well except
with spam that use the same declared address for both sender and
recipient. What happened in this
On 15/04/2010 18:26, Tomoyuki Murakami wrote:
From: Birta Leventeblevi.li...@gmail.com
Subject: DKIM-milter only for outgoing
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:12 +0300
My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
In the main.cf:
content_filter =
Hi all
My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
In the main.cf:
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
non_smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
milter_protocol = 2
milter_default_action = accept
With this configuration the
On 09/04/2010 13:43, hateSpam wrote:
Dear All,
I have Spamassassin on my Centos 5.4. For send and receive email I use
postfix and Dovecot and Sendmail version 8.13.8. Since I have installed the
spamassassin I have not configured it. We are getting about 20 spams per
day. I want to configure it
On 07/04/2010 15:10, CT wrote:
I had posted some of this before but since I wasn't a valid subscriber
I was silently ignored.. mybad.. :-)
---
I have an internal relay that I am replacing (sendmail with postfix)
I have followed :
66 matches
Mail list logo
