reject_unknown_sender_domain and TXT record

2017-08-16 Thread Brett @Google
Hello, Recently noticed some "domain not found" errors by reject_unknown_sender_domain in sender_recipient_checks. Following up I noticed : The domain in the From: address has a SPF record (ONLY) : nslookup -q=ANY kent676.kent.gov.uk kent676.kent.gov.uk text = "v=spf1 ip4:194.80.130.18

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

2017-04-04 Thread Brett @Google
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Paolo Barbato wrote: > > I've anyway just receive a feedback from CGPro developers that I share as > promised: > > For 6.2c3 (later this April): > LDAP: search for non-routable address under the dc=cgprouter base now > returns empty

Re: upgrading postfix 3.0.x to 3.1

2016-03-08 Thread Brett @Google
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: > Brett @Google: > > Hello, > > > > I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there > > are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit

Re: upgrading postfix 3.0.x to 3.1

2016-03-02 Thread Brett @Google
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:27:26PM +1000, Brett @Google wrote: > > > I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there > > are a few issues at least on solaris,

upgrading postfix 3.0.x to 3.1

2016-03-02 Thread Brett @Google
Hello, I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit library formats when compared to Linux. (running on SunOS server 5.10 Generic_150400-29 sun4v sparc sun4v) 1. Is seems to be no longer possible