Hi,
eh…
OK, that's getting stranger. At least it works now – but I don't know
why. Postfix started accepting the mail and correctly resolving the
alias some time in the night between 24th and 25th of October. I had
a script sitting here sending test mails every hour (because all of
this was
Hi,
> I suspect a subtle typo is at work. Try:
> postmap -q supp...@example.com hash:/path/to/your/virtual_alias_map
I of course tested such things before asking...
The alias resolves using postmap.
Also, the support2 alias was deliberately created using copy to avoid
typos. Adding the
Hi,
I am facing a strange issue here, where I cannot resolve a virtual
alias with the local part support@.
I have a domain example.com in $virtual_mailbox_domains. The virtual
transport sends mail on to Dovecot. For virtual aliases, I use a basic
hash table, containing:
i...@example.com
Hi,
[ please excuse me if this kind of progress reports for learning ]
[ and feedback are discouraged on this list ]
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:31:00AM +, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022, Dominik George wrote:
>
> > only that these have a very
Hi,
But the problem is that all users on the same ubuntu server will be
able to use the same google account to send emails. Is there a way to
configure postfix so that each Ubuntu user will use his/her own google
account to send emails? Thanks.
You could always build transport maps dependent
Hi,
I am having an issue where Postfix does not attempt to authenticate to
the relay I am using, even though the settings appear to be correct.
When I look in the maillog, I see *530 Authentication is required
before sending*, and when I run a packet trace, I don't see Postfix
ever using
Hi Arun,
How do I add a password for the a...@mx.testdomain.loc that I would
use in my mail client program, like Thunderbird, to access the
account? Both for sending and receiving?
receiving is clearly out oft scope here, but implies you will be using an IMAP
server.
In that case, Dovecot can
Hi,
I'm not entirely sure what these RSETs are but they could be that the
customer was hammering our mail server and we ran out of smtpd
connections/processes to handle it.
RSET is an SMTP command sent by the client. Form what I see, your Postfix duely
tried to reply to it but the reply dropped
Hi Charles,
Currently, if I set up the alias, each recipient only sees
themselves as the recipient, but I need all recipients to see each
other, so each knows the other received it.
I do not quite understand that. Normally, when you use a simple alias,
no adresses are rewritten, so the
Hi,
I am running Postfix on my local machine and it passes on mail to a
smarthost to which it is connected through a very non-optimal
connection.
Sending a mail with a PDF attachment of 3 MiB regularly takes up to 30
minutes.
Is there a way to trace how much of a message body has been
Hi,
[...] The user you are trying to contact is receiving mail at a rate
that prevents additional messages from being delivered. [...]
I do not see what's so unclear about that?
Google thinks that the recipient receives an unusual amount of mail.
It's either the recipient's or Google's fault
But for some crazy reason postfix keeps trying to deliver all mail to
mailinator.com instrad of mail.ru. What am I doing wrong? Also, I
tried to send new mail to t...@comain.tld and it went to
my-spam-acco...@mail.ru as expected. Why does requeue ignores
virtual_alias_maps entry and keeps
Because oif [0]. The queue you are requeueing to simply is situated
after the rewrite (cleanup) process.
I jsut realized that in fact, -r throws the mail into maildrop, so
rewriting SHOULD take place.
Check (post) your config!
-nik
--
* concerning Mozilla code leaking assertion failures
You could even tell people it's exchange and they wouldn't know from
the
front-end, and best of all it's all FOSS. I'm not sure if a big
corporation would go for it, but it is an option.
Rumor has it that this has been working well even on governmental level.
The government of an unnamed
Merve Temizer mervet2...@gmail.com schrieb:
When i run perl script alone with another input, i can see some output
in
output.txt.
I think the issue is not that permission is denied on the file you intend to
use, the issue is that you expect the script to run with CWD=/home/merve. Did
you write
M.Atıf CEYLAN meh...@atifceylan.com schrieb:
On 06-12-2013 18:14, Dominik George wrote:
chmod 777 /home/merve/output.txt
try with chmod 777 -R /home/merve
Don't.
I think she asked only for testing. If not, don't permit everything :)
That doesn't matter. Please do never encourage anybody
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:56:50AM +0200, Merve Temizer wrote:
I followed the steps on the page
http://serverfault.com/questions/258469/how-to-configure-postfix-to-pipe-all-incoming-email-to-a-script
I wrote something on console by a script but could not see my mails in
directory
Hi,
Do i have to use sendmail to inject mail back, does not it become an
infinite loop, how can i manage this, is not there a cleaner way?
there is still some confusion about what you are trying to achieve. I
understand that you need to save all incoming mail, but:
a) is your script the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com schrieb:
For the first time ever, 7 of my (very much legitimate) automated
messages sent to gmail users have bounced with this message:
Our system has detected that this message is likely unsolicited mail.
To reduce the
Juerg Reimann j...@jworld.ch schrieb:
Does anybody have an idea what could be wrong?
Just a wild guess... Is your Postfix chroot'ed, and if so, have the listed
files been copied there?
Enabling debugging, what do the logs tell you about the mapping process?
Cheers,
Nik
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:16:41AM +, Ed W wrote:
Hi, I would like to experiment with disallowing smtp connections
from setting up tls from certain IP addresses, whilst allowing all
other connections to do as they please. Any thoughts on how I could
configure this please?
He made the same claim, however, but never backed it up. How are you
reaching your conclusion?
Because this only mentions A records and IPv4 prefixes?
http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax#mx
Quick testing:
m...@staticsafe.ca - @gmail.com account
Received-SPF: pass (google.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Rainer Stransky rainer.stran...@so-fa.de schrieb:
Although I have a content_filter configration (master.cf):
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter = filter:dummy
vs.
- maillog --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org schrieb:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 04:32:54PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
francis picabia skrev den 2013-10-18 16:04:
# smtpinet n - n -60 smtpd
If I turn off smtp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Mark Martinec mark.martinec+post...@ijs.si schrieb:
IMO, instead of working on workarounds, people's efforts would be
better spent
on setting up their DKIM and/or SPF, reverse DNS mapping, and making
sure that
postfix only binds to an intentionally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Patrick Ben Koetter p...@sys4.de schrieb:
* Pol Hallen postfi...@fuckaround.org:
Am 18.10.2013 21:27, schrieb Pol Hallen:
I configurated postfix ad mxbackup. show set a quote forma each
domain?
*what* are you talking about?
that
Hi,
what about giving the real IP and output of ifconfig to give others
the chance to verify this for you instead say i took care
ok, here we go:
* sender address
Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de
* configuration
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap
Hi,
if i would be you i would *not* use v=spf1 mx ~all
If I were [...] ...
here you go for ipv6
http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax#ip6
Jeez, I don't believe it. The problem is that the mx mechanism simply
only enumerates A records of MXs. That's broken ...
Thanks for the pointer to
Hi,
that all sounds cool, but ...
Anyways, my users are happy. Their mail gets delivered. See my blog
post
http://blog.hqcodeshop.fi/archives/122-Fixing-Googles-new-IPv6-mail-policy-with-Postfix.html
about my fix.
could you please fix that to point to something more helpful than an
empty,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:16:27AM -0400, Carlos R Laguna wrote:
LDAP is not SQL, and inverse relations (groups of user, rather than
users of group) are very difficult to express.
Whereas, if the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Carlos R Laguna carl...@jovenclub.cu schrieb:
Dominik George you mind to explain yourseld a little more further.
If your LDAP users are regular system users, i.e., have the posixAccount class,
and your mail servers uses them for local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:16:27AM -0400, Carlos R Laguna wrote:
LDAP is not SQL, and inverse relations (groups of user, rather than
users of group) are very difficult to express.
On second
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de schrieb:
Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:16:27AM -0400, Carlos R Laguna wrote:
LDAP is not SQL, and inverse relations (groups of user, rather
than
users of group
Just read pine.bsm.4.64l.1310010843490.20...@herc.mirbsd.org. My mate
got it sumemd up quite well.
Thanks, but I don't have access to you ~/.pine directory!
I'll dig through the thread, though, I'm sure that I'll find the post. Thanks!
It was posted to the list, so you will have
It was posted to the list, so you will have received it, and any
reasonable MUA can search for it. Giving publlicm essage IDs is a
perfectly valid way of pointing to a message on a list.
The string 'Pine.BSM.4.64L.1310010843490.20824' does not appear in my
postfix-users@postfix.org
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:09:52PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/13/2013 8:35 AM, Dominik George wrote:
It was posted to the list, so you will have received it, and any
reasonable MUA can search for it. Giving publlicm essage IDs is a
perfectly valid way of pointing to a message
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.os.miros.general/month=20131001
WRT the first point in the blog post, Thorsten is incorrect. Google
does publish lists of their outbound IPs via their SPF records.
~$ dig txt _netblocks.google.com _netblocks2.google.com
Sure, but how would you reliably
There is, in fact, no reliable lsit of *all* mail hosts that will ever
(as in, for a long time in the future) be the sending MTAs of
Google-hosted domains.
Apart from that, I am tired of implementing exceptions for each and
every big proprietary mail provider out there. If a company desires to
Hi,
while debugging the Google/IPv6 issue, we discovered something strange.
Our uplink provider operates caching DNS servers, and they reply with a
rather detailed Additional section when asked for MX records, but only
with cached results.
For example, if example.com has an MX record pointing to
Confirmed, Postfix looks at the answer section only. Claims to
the contrary are based on false speculation.
Hmm, that leads us to the original question:
Why does postfix sometimes not find the record for any given MX?
-nik
--
# apt-assassinate --help
Usage: apt-assassinate
The correct description is:
When both IPv4 and IPv6 support are enabled, the Postfix SMTP
client, for Postfix versions prior to 2.8, will attempt to
connect via IPv6 before attempting to use IPv4. Starting
with 2.8 protocol preference is controlled via the new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_sender_access
Are you using Postfix =2.10? If so, have you tried smtpd_relay_access?
Cheers,
Nik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_sender_access
Are you using Postfix =2.10? If so, have you tried smtpd_relay_access?
smtpd_relay_restrictions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
wie...@porcupine.org schrieb:
Thomas Moretto:
Can someone add some clarification to this setting:
smtpd_client_message_rate_limitThe number of
messages and advisor would be able to send in a 5 minute period
Does the counter count each unique
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On a side note: Stop the threadjacking.
Thanks!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid
iQFNBAEBCgA3BQJSVFIPMBxEb21pbmlrIEdlb3JnZSAobW9iaWxlIGtleSkgPG5p
a0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlPgAKCRAvLbGk0zMOJaolB/9PgX5yhulip3+5JQFBqAHP
Hi,
I somehow consider Google not fit for anything a mail server should
do, for a ton of reasons, and am thinking about blocking them in
both directions (along with Yahoo!), if it weren't for quite some
important users switching to Google Apps.
I would love to know the rest of your
SMTP from an address with no reverse DNS is a fairly good indicator
of a spam source. YMMV.
Agreed.
As a matter of fact, I *do* have working PTR, SPF, and all that stuff,
for both IPv4 and IPv6, and it doesn't help. I should note that I did
have that all the time, not just after Google
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Needless to say, that if I use IPv4 Google accepts every mail.
Dis this happened to anyone else?
Yes, I also face that issue and have forced IPv4 on known Google domains.
Google have been ignoring my support tickets about that for several weeks
Hi,
there is no mailHost attribute in ldap (or *any* attribute that is the
next hop dns name). I need to map an attribute in ldap to something that
*isn't* in ldap.
You could define transports with the names from LDAP as SMTP transports
in master.cf and then use these names from within your
Hi,
postfwd allows for fine tuning of such limitation.
-nik
Philippe Bloix pbl...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi!
I would like to set a limit rate per domain. I know i can use
« destination_rate_delay » and it works ! The problem is that the
minimum
period is 1s. It permits to send 1 email per
Hi,
you can run saslauthd as a standalone auth process.
-nik
massi m.sp...@bullnetsecurity.it schrieb:
Hi there,
I need to activate SMTP authentication on a Postfix server that has no
mailbox on board (it relays email for Google Apps service and certified
emails). All the mailbox are stored
Hi,
the key is that by sendmail, we mean the sendmail command. Postfix has a
sendmail-compatible frontend.
You can just use the mail command like so:
$ mail -a From: Your Name yourm...@example.com -s Your Subject
recpm...@example.com EOT
Your Text
EOT
-nik
Krzysztof Szarlej
Hi,
what is wrong with the sendmail program and a simple shell script?
What is wrong with sending all mails in a batch?
Last but not least, what aspect of your plan dos NOT match plain spamming?
Cheers,
Nik
Krzysztof Szarlej kszarle...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hey guys i have finally set my mail
Hi,
But i don't see two following lines in above:
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN
have you upgraded Postfix to 2.10 recently?
In this case, you might have missed the smtpd_relay_restrictions change
pointed out in the release notes [1]:
Feature 20121007] This version introduces
Hi,
imho, the best approach to getting a road-warrior (laptop) authenticated
as a sattelite sytem using your central MTA as a relayhost is have it in
mynetworks. As in, connect it to the MTA through a VPN tunnel.
Then, there is nothing that that limits you to use PAM for
authenticaiton. You can
Hi Patrick,
I have a customer who would like to configure the Postfix server he uses
such that certain users can only send to local users. I'm wondering if
there are any built-in facilities for restricting which delivery agents can
be used by particular users? (Or some other clever way of
Hi,
as always, postfwd might be the answer.
-nik
Antonio Tommasi antonio.tomm...@unile.it schrieb:
Hi to all
i need to block email if the number of recipients is greater than a
specific number and message size exceeds fixed limit.
In main.cf i can configure message_size_limit and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yeah, shitstorm!
Now *that's* real distributed Postfix load-testing :)!
SCNR.
- -nik
- --
* mirabilos is handling my post-1990 smartphone *
mirabilos Aaah, it vibrates! Wherefor art thou, daemonic device??
PGP fingerprint: 2086 9A4B E67D 1DCD
Hi,
look at postfwd.
Cheers,
Nik
Ram r...@netcore.co.in schrieb:
Our client's postfix servers are being frequently getting attacks using
compromised accounts
In most cases it seems the spammer simply uses a phished
username/password , sends a whole lot of 419ers until we manually
change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
But as a matter of fact, both test clients are covered by
permit_inet_interfaces, the default for local_header_rewrite_cients. Plus,
rewrites stopped working without changing Postfix version or config.
OK, can it. I got it.
60 matches
Mail list logo
