Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011, 16:41:49 schrieb Helder Oliveira:
Has anyone experience with ReturnPath that can share ? Is the paid money
worth the results ?
Yes, but it's not worth it in my opinion.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Dominik
vboxadm.net - Postfix admin Interface
Am Montag, 2. Mai 2011, 12:57:01 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 02.05.2011 12:49, schrieb Mihira Fernando:
how stoopid can anybody be to make server-answers form a spamfilter
with 451 in polish and a form nobody out there can read followed
by a RED SUCCESS MESSAGE (finding out success after
On Thu, April 21, 2011 7:11 pm, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dominik Schulz:
because my transport is special crafted to return a default value
for
non-existing users, i.e. it can never fail.
Your table does not satisfy Postfix requirements.
I'm not trying to be mean, I'd just like to use
of) the available documentation.
--
Best Regards,
Dominik Schulz
Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2011, 14:13:49 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Dominik Schulz:
I've got a rather complex Postfix setup and experiencing some issues with
the handling of transport maps.
Short Story:
Postfix replaces %u by 'user+ext' when querying my transport maps
although it should
, Vexim and others are included.
The main goals of this project are security, maintainability and scalability.
Best Regards,
Dominik Schulz
Hi,
I'd like to make a special transport never bounce.
For role accounts (abuse, postmaster, etc.) I'd like to pipe the mails
directly into our trouble ticket system using a special pipe transport.
However this delivery could fail and normally postfix would generate a bounce
from that.
Hi,
I'm currently planning to migrate an Exim mailserver to Postfix due to
performance issues and security concerns.
The only remaining open issue is something I'd like to call selective relaying
- please provide a more apt name if there is one.
The Exim mailserver is configured to handle
Am Donnerstag, 9. September 2010, 17:31:14 schrieb Wietse Venema:
l...@ds.gauner.org:
Postfix seems not to update the nexthop when a filter matches in a
multi-recipient mail.
As documented, the FILTER action affects ALL RECIPIENTS of the same
message.
Ok, thank you. I knew that I must have
Am Montag 11 Januar 2010 15:08:05 schrieb Wietse Venema:
l...@ds.gauner.org:
Hi,
I'm trying to use header_checks in conjunction with a pcre map to
distribute certain mail traffic to certain outgoing transports. I've got
a setup like this:
--- main.cf snip ---
header_checks =
10 matches
Mail list logo
