[pfx] some questions about controlling postfix and meaning of data

(Sorry if this doesn't show up in the right thread, but these problems actually caused me to lose the mail sent to me last night, so I'm responding to what I see in the mailing list archive.) All of my problems seem to have come from this original sin: yum install ... postfix sendmail ...

[pfx] some questions about controlling postfix and meaning of data

on the old server but not the new one: this no longer works (whereas it does in the old server) date | sendmail don (same result for mail as sendmail, though they seem to be totally different programs) I see in maillog something like this: Jan 17 22:22:50 isis-20240117-1030 sendmail[120557

Re: Postfix -> proemial issues..

> On Aug 5, 2016, at 3:20 PM, Don Krause <dkra...@optivus.com> wrote: > > I know this is probably the wrong place for this question, but maybe someone > can point out the “Hey Idiot, you missed something” part of the setup. > > New Debian 8 install, distribution provi

Postfix -> proemial issues..

EXTENSION" mailbox_command = procmail I’m hoping I’m just too blind to see the error today, and someone out there has a quick fix. Thanks. -- Don Krause "This message represents the official view of the voices in my head." smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

access

hi all i have a machine heavily hit with a bunch of from= messages... i read around and implemented the access solution as in: /etc/postfix/main.cf http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html: smtpd_client_restrictions http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_restrictions =

Re: access

thanks wietse.. i saw that earlier i was just hoping to avoid writing regular expressions... On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: don magnify: i have a machine heavily hit with a bunch of from= messages... ... my queue is growing very big and can't

Re: access

thanks noel... On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 12/11/2013 4:52 PM, don magnify wrote: hi all i have a machine heavily hit with a bunch of from= messages... [Please post in plain text only - the HTML markup makes the logs difficult

Re: smtp_fallback_relay sending to exchange for outbound messages?

- 1 scache I am not sure if I should have two relay directives in my master.cf or just edit the fallback_relay to smtp_fallback_relay. Thanks Don On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Don: So my question out of all of this is: How do we get

Re: smtp_fallback_relay sending to exchange for outbound messages?

Ok, Thank you Witse for the help will test. -Don On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.orgwrote: You can have only one relay/unix entry in master.cf. You use the name smtp_fallback_relay with Postfix 2.3 and later. The old name fallback_relay is still supported

smtp_fallback_relay sending to exchange for outbound messages?

Hi, we have been looking for ways of implementing some redundancy on our postfix gateways by using the smtp_fallback_directive. Our goal is to have mail to our domain example.com failover to our secondary exchange server if the primary is down. So in our transport we have: example.com