On 09.02.24 14:58, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
> Hi
> I have setup postfix+SPF+DKIM+DMARK and im confused
>
> Sometimes I get in logs fail like:
> Feb 2 09:02:46 mail134 opendmarc[29379]: AE3D53B0062: allegromail.pl fail
> Feb 2 09:02:45 mail134 opendmarc[29379]: 888B43B0063 ignoring
>
On 08/01/2023 15:56, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Received: by kent.sdaoden.eu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
> id 25D02B4B1E; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 19:35:21 +0100 (CET)
> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 19:35:21 +0100
> Author: Steffen Nurpmeso
> From: Steffen Nurpmeso
>
> you are not using postfix imho
On 13/04/2022 05:31, John Levine wrote:
> For doing DMARC validation, I know about the opendmarc milter. Is that what
> everyone uses? Is there anything else used in pratice?
>
> I know about perl and python libraries but they don't seem to have
> milters or other ready to use integrations into
On 03/07/2021 13:29, Markus E. wrote:
> By the way, I like the way Google merges the headers into one, like:
>
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
> dkim=pass header.i=@example.net header.s=example header.b=lXmpAXoJ;
> spf=pass (google.com: domain of u...@example.net designates
On 14.03.21 20:14, Juri Haberland wrote:
> On 14.03.21 12:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:51:05AM +0100, Juri Haberland wrote:
>>> You should get this information from the AR-header. It should look like
>>> this:
>>> Authentication-Re
On 14.03.21 12:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:51:05AM +0100, Juri Haberland wrote:
>> You should get this information from the AR-header. It should look like
>> this:
>> Authentication-Results: mx.example.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine
>> dis=no
On 11/03/2021 10:22, Nick Tait wrote:
> On 11/03/21 11:37 am, Dan Mahoney wrote:
>> This fix has been merged to the opendmarc “Develop” branch as of a few
>> minutes ago and will likely be in a 1.4.1 that comes out in the next few
>> weeks, and will default to *not* quaranting the mail. The
On 26/04/2020 13:21, Francesc Peñalvez wrote:
> I don't have the correct dkim entry in the domain?
In this post you have no dkim signature at all!
Juri
On 27.12.2017 08:22, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
> I configured yesterday spf, dkim, dmarc for example.com. Today I got report
> in xml on my mailbox. Attached. One from addresses has dkim failed - marked
> in orange. What that means and how to fix it? I use ubuntu 16.04 lts and
> postfix:
Judging
On 10.12.2017 17:03, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
> I'm getting tons of spam with mail senders or helo names from TLDs like
> .date, e.g.
> where the domain names (here: koan-shf.date) rapidly change and are
> obviously randomly generated. IP addresses also change daily.
> I'd therefore like to block
On 2017-04-28 14:14, Allen Coates wrote:
If you check your IP address on THEIR look-up page -
https://www.ers.trendmicro.com/reputations - it will tell you WHY you
are black-listed.
No, it just tells you, that you are listed and in what list - but not
why.
Juri
On 2017-04-28 12:03, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
I'm assuming you requested to be unblocked.
https://www.ers.trendmicro.com/guide/en_us/AG/Intro/Blocked.htm
Check for open relay. Unless you are the only user, I don't know if
you can really say you aren't sending spam..
I have the same
On 10.04.2017 18:33, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Mon, April 10, 2017 11:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> James B. Byrne:
>>> The issue seems to be some sort of time-out with the Amavis proxy.
>>> 66 Apr 8 10:50:27 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[18374]: warning:
>>> timeout talking to proxy
On 12.02.2017 03:13, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> Theres no relay between me and postfix. And this is the report:
>
> Feedback-Type: auth-failure
> Version: 1
> User-Agent: OpenDMARC-Filter/1.3.2
> Auth-Failure: dmarc
> Authentication-Results: mx01.nausch.org; dmarc=fail header.from=sebbe.eu
>
On 2017-01-16 13:49, @lbutlr wrote:
I have an email account that belonged to someone who died recently.
Rather than simply shutdown the account and bounce all future emails,
the family would like some sort of automated messages for at least a
few months saying something like “ died in November,
On 13.11.2016 21:33, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 08:42:19AM +0100, Juri Haberland wrote:
>> Just go with the tips from BetterCrypto.org - as the site above suggests,
>> too.
>
> Better yet, stick with the Postfix defaults, they were chosen with
>
On 13.11.2016 07:55, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 01:43:17 -0500
> "Bill Cole" wrote:
> >
>> If the NSA/GCHQ capturing all of your SMTP traffic and saving it for
>> hypothetical future decryption is a realistic and significant
>>
On 11.11.2016 12:21, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> So is this level of encryption something openssl sets up? That is where do I
> set the parameter?
You might want to read
https://bettercrypto.org/static/applied-crypto-hardening.pdf
It has background information and configuration examples for
On 28.07.2016 21:38, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2016-07-28 21:18, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> openssl s_client -connect yourserver:587 -starttls smtp
>
> tested and it works with that one as it should
>
> outlook express and andreoid works aswell, it just for me thunderbird
> does not
Thunderbird
Josef Karliak wrote:
> Hi,
> I found that only emails with "dmarc=fail" in the headers are sent to
> postmaster - as it is defined in our dmarc record, but that should be
> statistics, not emails...
Maybe you have "CopyFailuresTo" set in your opendmarc.conf?
--
Juri
20 matches
Mail list logo