Re: stupid question about removing maildir attachments

Well attachments shouldn't be bigger than 50M anyways, 25M is already big. If you want to send files bigger than 50M you should look another way to have users share files, like a file transer service. On 12/31/2017 07:41 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Well, case is that I want to migrate from postf

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

Oorspronkelijk bericht- >>> Van: postfixlists-070...@billmail.scconsult.com >>> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Bill Cole >>> Verzonden: woensdag 13 december 2017 16:46 >>> Aan: Postfix users >>> Onderwerp: Re: Question regardin

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

I'll have a look at amavisd-new after the new year since that seems to be the more update one. So with amvisd-new you can also do spam filtering, use different scanners, filename blocking etc? On 2017-12-13 11:02, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2017-12-13 Maarten wrote: According to

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works too. https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/ What would be the advantage to switching to something like amavisd-new? . On 2017-12-13 10:28, Benny Pedersen wrote: Maarten skrev den 2017-12-13 10:11: I use MailScanner, I&#

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

I use MailScanner, I'm happy so far with it. On 2017-12-13 10:05, Benny Pedersen wrote: John Stoffel skrev den 2017-12-12 16:53: Now to figure out why spamassisin as a milter ain't working properly... try rmilter, configure it for spamd, so you dont need to use spamc :=) same auhor as rspa

Re: DKIM signing for wildcard sub domains

l) On 2017-12-13 08:36, Maarten wrote: Check /etc/opendkim.conf. And the line that Says Mode. You probably have it set like this: Mode v Change it to: Mode sv sign verify On 2017-12-13 08:32, Kent wrote: Hi Maarten, Apologies - I missed this when I was copying my setup. I already have

Re: DKIM signing for wildcard sub domains

Check /etc/opendkim.conf. And the line that Says Mode. You probably have it set like this: Mode v Change it to: Mode sv sign verify On 2017-12-13 08:32, Kent wrote: Hi Maarten, Apologies - I missed this when I was copying my setup. I already have these lines in my /etc/postfix.main.cf

Re: DKIM signing for wildcard sub domains

], sasl_method=CRAM-MD5, sasl_username=maarten Dec 13 08:14:43 localhost postfix/cleanup[21938]: A1346749: hold: header Received: from a.mx.feedmebits.nl (supernova.feedmebits.nl [46.105.136.80])??(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))??(Client did not present a

Re: DKIM signing for wildcard sub domains

Think you are missing something like this in main.cf milter_protocol = 2 smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:8891 non_smtpd_milters = $smtpd_milters milter_default_action = accept http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_milters On 2017-12-13 03:10, Kent wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to get DKI

Re: recommend TLS settings

Hello Viktor, Thanks for your feedback and for the link ! Will configure 2048-bit DHE since I'm using a version older than 3.1. Maarten On 2017-12-02 20:13, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Dec 2, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Maarten wrote: I setup my postfix mailserver a while ago with tls set

recommend TLS settings

Hello, I setup my postfix mailserver a while ago with tls settings from: http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html http://www.postfix.org/FORWARD_SECRECY_README.html I don't know much about TLS settings so I used the settings which seemed be important in the documentation. When scanning my ser

Feature request: delay smtpd client connection response until queue item is removed

Hey, Normal smtpd client connection handling (after DATA) would be "Queued as ". I would like to request a feature where the smtpd response is delayed until the mail is completely actually handled (ie: removed from queue) (of course not by default). It would be (for example) only for t

weird bounce-loop

ser (thus goes to zarafa(lmtp)) ... ad nauseam... thus, quickly the zarafa mailserver has thousands of bounces in a few minutes... Is there a way to solve this issue? postfix obviously can't use the double- bounce check here, right? or not? Regards, Maarten Vanraes -- BA NV IT & Security

Re: feature request: one line of output from pipe to add to logging for audit purposes

Op donderdag 5 juni 2014 14:36:26 schreef Viktor Dukhovni: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:04:43PM +0200, Maarten Vanraes wrote: > > Op woensdag 4 juni 2014 12:49:29 schreef Wietse Venema: > > [...] > > > > > The pipe daemon expects a specific reponse format, and that

Re: feature request: one line of output from pipe to add to logging for audit purposes

Op woensdag 4 juni 2014 12:49:29 schreef Wietse Venema: [...] > The pipe daemon expects a specific reponse format, and that > format does not include SMTP reply codes. See pipe(8) manpage. > > I can see benefit in logging downstream status information, but it > will necessarily have to be limited.

feature request: one line of output from pipe to add to logging for audit purposes

x27;t mind either way. Regards, Maarten -- BA NV IT & Security