Re: Specific DNS server

2021-04-22 Thread Marco Pizzoli
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:21 PM Benny Pedersen wrote: > On 2021-04-22 16:44, Marco Pizzoli wrote: > > > I am afraid you did not get my point. > > i dont know your solution then > > rpz and qname can be problematic > > https://labs.ripe.net/author/wouter_de_vries/ma

Re: Specific DNS server

2021-04-22 Thread Marco Pizzoli
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 4:37 PM Benny Pedersen wrote: > On 2021-04-22 12:58, Marco Pizzoli wrote: > > Hello, > > +1 for this Request for Improvement. > > I also faced this need. > > > > Changing the machine solver was, unfortunately, not an option. > > w

Re: Specific DNS server

2021-04-22 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hello, +1 for this Request for Improvement. I also faced this need. Changing the machine solver was, unfortunately, not an option. Thanks Marco On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:21 PM Simon Wilson wrote: > Is there a way to make Postfix/postscreen use a specific DNS server? > > Reason for the questio

Re: VERP logging

2021-04-20 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hello Wietse, On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 5:48 PM Wietse Venema wrote: > Marco Pizzoli: > > Hi all, > > I have successfully configured VERP to work with my Postfix instance. > > > > I see the logs and I effectively see > > [truncated] /smtpd[999]: unknown[x.x.x.x]:

VERP logging

2021-04-20 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hi all, I have successfully configured VERP to work with my Postfix instance. I see the logs and I effectively see [truncated] /smtpd[999]: unknown[x.x.x.x]: replacing command "MAIL FROM:" with "MAIL FROM: XVERP" I know it worked also because I can indeed see, on the receiving side, the VERP-ed a

Re: SMTP session caching

2018-03-19 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hello Wietse, I was reading this topic with interest because this issue affects me very much as well. I had a slowness issue when sending to @hotmail.* . I tried all the Microsoft services in order to check how I was seen from them and I got confirmation that I was OK. I received this information

Re: Resolve before transport

2017-09-29 Thread Marco Pizzoli
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Peter wrote: > Hi guys, > > I send my emails via different gateways based on my transport file. Many > domains, however, use the same email providers, such as outlook or > gmail. Is there a way to check the MX records before the email is sent > and transport it u

DKIM-Signing forwarded email

2017-08-05 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hi all, I have a postfix instance dedicated to being the main MX (IN). I normally use other postfix instances for sending emails out (OUT). Of course, even this "IN" instance needs to send emails out, mainly bounces. Now I am also implementing forwarding rules: "if you receive an email destined t

Re: SMTP connection reuse with TLS

2017-08-02 Thread Marco Pizzoli
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 07:11:23PM +0200, Marco Pizzoli wrote: > > > Have a look at: > > - smtp_tls_session_cache_database <-- this is the most important thing. > I > > suggest lmdb as the backing store >

Re: SMTP connection reuse with TLS

2017-08-02 Thread Marco Pizzoli
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:57 PM, mark burdett wrote: > That's true, as a work-around. Unfortunately we're talking about not just > opening a new TCP connection but also reestablishing TLS, which means yet > more RTT and CPU. So the increased concurrency will be significant and > will require up

Feature request: MX rollup

2017-06-06 Thread Marco Pizzoli
This is a followup of the following request: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Sending-rate-limiting-per-destination-MTA-not-recipient-domain-td87355.html The feature I am asking for is implemented in PowerMTA with the name "MX rollup": http://www.circleid.com/posts/20160516_port25_announces_re

Re: Optimising new system and postscreen questions

2017-05-01 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hello Simon, The server runs local caching DNS BIND, so it's as quick as I can get it on > the slow Internet connection we are on. > I don't qualify mysef expert enough to answer the rest of your points, but for the DNS part I suggest you think about replacing BIND with Unbound, as the DNS resolv

Getting bounces from only one server

2017-02-15 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Dear all, I need to find a workaround an issue I am facing due to the limitation of an external product I am using to send/receive emails. Long story short: - 2 postfix servers acting both as sending as receiving servers from/to the Internet. - 1 application server sending to the Internet via both

multi-instances: how to discriminate "master" in process list

2017-01-03 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hi all, I have a multi-instance setup. By doing "ps -ef", as expected, I see a lot of "master" processes. Is there a way to see which master is related to which instance at a glance? So that I can rapidly say this pid is for instance 1, and so on... What I am looking at is, ideally, a way to see t

Re: Sending rate limiting per destination MTA (not recipient domain)

2016-11-18 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hello Wietse, On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Marco Pizzoli: > > Hi all, > > I am sending a bunch of emails to a set of target domains. > > I see that many of them are all served by the same MTA and this MTA is > > limiting my sending because

Sending rate limiting per destination MTA (not recipient domain)

2016-11-18 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hi all, I am sending a bunch of emails to a set of target domains. I see that many of them are all served by the same MTA and this MTA is limiting my sending because of course it sees too many sending at a time from me. I know I could just use the transport map for all of these target domains and

Re: destination throttling state sharing

2015-02-18 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hi Wietse, On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Marco Pizzoli: > > > Is there a way to share this kind of information between Postfix > instances? > > This is not implemented. Postfix by design can recover from a crash > in any program except the mas

destination throttling state sharing

2015-02-18 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hi all, I have a battery of postfix servers used for sending bulk emails to the Internet. All of them are seen from the outside as they were one: - same hostname - same public IP address Considered that I have implemented the sending throttling for specific destinations in order to avoid "status=d