var/log/mail.log
195
$ grep -c -i offered /var/log/mail.log
0
$
For example it says " Trusted TLS connection established to
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.73.27]:25: TLSv1.3" because of
smtp_tls_loglevel = 1, but does not say anything about offer.
How can it be? Does ubuntu brok
mail
other for rest of the world and "smtpd_recipient_restrictions" with
"reject_non_fqdn_recipient" in it.
Works perfectly.
--
Pagarbiai,
Nerijus Kislauskas
KTU ITD, Litnet valdymo centras
Studentu g. 48a - 101, Kaunas
tel.: (8~37) 30 06 45
mob. tel.: 8-614-93889
e-mail.: ner
be 3 postfix instances with 2 domains being
served as mx and smtp, 1 for system itself, over 16 IP adresses (both v4
and v6) and a cluster on top of that. I need as much simple
configuration as it could be.
Thanks for any advice.
--
Pagarbiai,
Nerijus Kislauskas
KTU ITD, Litnet valdymo centras
Stude
~rjbs/Email-Address-1.903/lib/Email/Address.pm
in the wild, which doesn't correctly parse such From: header. Thanks for
answers.
--
Pagarbiai,
Nerijus Kislauskas
KTU ITD, Litnet valdymo centras
Studentu g. 48a - 101, Kaunas
tel.: (8~37) 30 06 45
mob. tel.: 8-614-93889
e-mail.: nerijus.kislaus
bul.
I'm from Eastern European country. Former Soviet block doesn't exist 20
years already. Step away from the keyboards and look around the world
you are living in.
--
Sincerely,
Nerijus Kislauskas
pful.
--
Sincerely,
Nerijus Kislauskas
On 03/28/2012 02:15 PM, Γεώργιος Δεδούσης wrote:
> If Wietse suddenly gets tired, retired
Or even will die one day?
--
Sincerely,
Nerijus Kislauskas
| v3 client |
+---+---+---+
| v2 server |yes| unknown |
+---+---+---+
| v3 server |no |yes|
+---+---+---+
v2 support in openldap should be enabled additionaly (v3 by default), so
+1 from me for "version=3" as default.
-
e ninjas are being busy with lives, our submission configuration is
as follows:
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
smtpd_tls_security_level=may
smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes
and mynetworks is of course my client networks. Works good so far (about
a month).
--
Sincerely,
Nerijus Kislauskas
ook like? There was once a misc.schema with mailLocalAddress, mailHost,
mailRoutingAddress attributes and inetLocalMailRecipient object class.
Not sure this schema is included in LDAP by default.
--
Sincerely,
Nerijus Kislauskas
chemas. So you can try to
invent a bike again, but maybe it is easier to use invented one.
In case user/admin needs 3-wheel bike, he can do it by itself.
--
Sincerely,
Nerijus Kislauskas
On 03/02/2012 01:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
> There is <...> no custom "Postfix schema"
Hi,
maybe it is worth to make one to stop question cycle "where I can get
postfix.schema for LDAP?".
--
Sincerely,
Nerijus Kislauskas
nd printing to logs about lost connection
after data command". SMTP commands are small network packets. When
client sends data, network packets must be as big as possible.
More likely it's related to network and MTU issues on client side.
--
Nerijus Kislauskas
server.
Indeed, we have a problem with LDAP lookups too, but dog's voice doesn't
go to heaven. :)
--
Pagarbiai,
Nerijus Kislauskas
KTU ITPI, Litnet valdymo centras
Studentu g. 48a - 101, Kaunas
tel.: (8~37) 30 06 45
mob. tel.: 8-614-93889
e-mail.: nerijus.kislaus...@ktu.lt
#x27;s unknowable. It's
impossible, but it's also right in front of us all the time.
--
Pagarbiai,
Nerijus Kislauskas
KTU ITPI, Litnet valdymo centras
Studentu g. 48a - 101, Kaunas
tel.: (8~37) 30 06 45
mob. tel.: 8-614-93889
e-mail.: nerijus.kislaus...@ktu.lt
t_maps
etc
(a) group needs "read" permission on result_attribute attributes, while
(b) group needs only "search" permission. What I want from all ot this,
that postfix would be able to work with minimal required ldap access
permissions. And now you require "read" for both
you get a DN (and DN you get always if there is a
match), that's it, entry found.
LDAP protocol is a beauty. The masterpiece is how you are using it.
--
Pagarbiai,
Nerijus Kislauskas
KTU ITPI, Litnet valdymo centras
Studentu g. 48a - 101, Kaunas
tel.: (8~37) 30 06 45
mob. tel.: 8-614-93889
e-mail.: nerijus.kislaus...@ktu.lt
failed" while
other options - "lookup returned something". Am I not correct?
--
Pagarbiai,
Nerijus Kislauskas
KTU ITPI, Litnet valdymo centras
Studentu g. 48a - 101, Kaunas
tel.: (8~37) 30 06 45
mob. tel.: 8-614-93889
e-mail.: nerijus.kislaus...@ktu.lt
e used.
--
Pagarbiai,
Nerijus Kislauskas
KTU ITPI, Litnet valdymo centras
Studentu g. 48a - 101, Kaunas
tel.: (8~37) 30 06 45
mob. tel.: 8-614-93889
e-mail.: nerijus.kislaus...@ktu.lt
On 10/26/2011 11:02 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 26/10/2011 10:29 πμ, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
> If you don't want to check users, use:
>
>relay_recipient_maps =
>
> (i.e. without any value)
>
> You may want to read this message:
> http://tech.groups.yahoo
On 10/25/2011 03:09 PM, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
> So why it is important to return something from LDAP in order to be
> *sure* entry exists? Search without result_attribute responds with 1
> match. Why it can't be a key for descision, that there is a entry and
> let messag
sts? Search without result_attribute responds with 1
match. Why it can't be a key for descision, that there is a entry and
let message to pass through? Thanks for clearing things out.
--
Pagarbiai,
Nerijus Kislauskas
KTU ITPI, Litnet valdymo centras
Studentu g. 48a - 101, Kaunas
tel.: (8~3
22 matches
Mail list logo
