approach.
Thanks!
Nicolás
Mensaje original
De: wie...@porcupine.org
Fecha:25/03/2016 17:56 (GMT+00:00)
Para: Postfix users <postfix-users@postfix.org>
Asunto: Re: Hardware with non-FQDN EHLO
Nicol?s:
> Hi,
>
> I have some hardware which I've configured to send
.
I'd like to know if there's a simpler way to handle these kind of situations,
though. Do you guys have some tips?
Thanks.
Nicolás
Hi,
We have a filter located outside our organization for outgoing mail
which rewrites the Return-Path to their domain, in the form:
username=abc@theirdomain.com. Once the filter processes the message,
it's forwarded to the destination where these headers are received:
Return-Path:
ameter
instead of mime_header_checks, though).
Regards,
Nicolás
ou can use reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname in the smtpd_helo_restrictions
parameter. For example:
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
reject_unknown_helo_hostname
permit
Regards,
Nicolás
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#danger
Regards,
Nicolás
to this value so
the user mailbox's path would be returned as
/home/virtual/quantum-radio.net/station.manager/.
Regards,
Nicolás
missed copying the sentence correctly.
[...]
I did have this
virtual_mailbox_base = /var/mail/vhosts
[...]
Also check that this directory (and subdirectories) has the right
permissions so Postfix and your e-mail server can access them. Otherwise
you'll get errors.
Regards,
Nicolás
of the domains and see the
result for debugging purposes.
Another idea: Is your environment chrooted? Maybe it's a resolv.conf
misconfiguration inside your chroot jail.
Regards,
Nicolás
El 24/03/2015 a las 20:00, Wietse Venema escribió:
After 18 years, including the best of my career, I decided that it
was time to move on. I'll be working on security at Google NY.
Please, there is no reason to say negative things about my old
employer (or my new one!).
Needless to say, I will
-mail will go through a different header or
body table depending on which domain it is.
I didn't find any restriction to define inside
smtpd_(client|sender|recipient)_restrictions that I could use to achieve it.
Is it even possible to do this?
Thanks.
Nicolás
recommend another way to face it?
Thanks,
Nicolás
El 05/03/2015 a las 22:30, Noel Jones escribió:
On 3/5/2015 1:27 PM, Nicolás wrote:
Hi,
Up until now I've been using Postfix for one domain, evidently with
just one configuration, using the virtual domains approach. Now I'm
in a situation where I need to handle another completely different
El 05/03/2015 a las 23:03, Noel Jones escribió:
On 3/5/2015 4:51 PM, Nicolás wrote:
Actually, on second though, the different part just implies that
one of the domains should run a check_policy_service in its
smtpd_(sender|recipient)_restrictions, and the other one would not.
Postfix can do
gains reputation
little by little.
Regards,
Nicolás
I'm running Postfix 2.11 and I'm having some issues with the
check_sender_access parameter. Currently my configuration for sender
restrictions is the following:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/valid_senders
El 22/10/2014 a las 19:47, Viktor Dukhovni escribió:
Mail that passes these two conditions is either sent from a client
that matches permit_mynetworks (checks logs or Received headers for
client IP) or from an *envelope sender* address that is not blocked
by that table.
Ok, this would explain
(most important are the
user_query and password_query directives).
However, this question probably better suits the Dovecot mail list as
the issue you're having has apparently nothing to do with Postfix.
Nicolás
is them.
--
John Baker
Network Administrator
Marlboro College
Phone: 451-7551 Cell: 490-0066
Regards,
Nicolás
Maybe Apparmor/SELinux/alike blocking access to /run directory?
Enviado de Samsung Mobile
Mensaje original
De: li...@rhsoft.net
Fecha:04/08/2014 21:18 (GMT+01:00)
Para: Mailing-List postfix postfix-users@postfix.org
Asunto: service
El 25/07/2014 3:45, Ian Evans escribió:
I'm currently running postfix in two places. I have a fully
functioning postfix email server for my site's domain and at home I
have postfix installed to allow my home server to send alert messages.
The home server is relaying through my home ISP's smtp
Hi,
After maintaining an old version of Postfix for some longer time, I
finally decided to jump to version 2.11 and currently I'm tuning it up.
I'm having an issue with smtpd_relay_restrictions. At this time, the
configuration is the default one:
smtpd_relay_restrictions =
El 22/07/2014 8:58, Jonas Wielicki escribió:
On 22.07.2014 08:17, Nicolás wrote:
Having this configuration, anyone using my mail server as the relayhost
is able to send mails to the domains that I handle (not outside), even
without SASL. I guess that behavior is determined
as from the older server which
is also running on debian squeeze.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advanced for your time.
Have you checked whether selinux/apparmor/similar could be blocking it?
Regards,
Nicolás
El 26/07/2012 15:52, /dev/rob0 escribió:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:45:54PM +0100, Nicolás wrote:
El 23/07/2012 12:13, Nicolás escribió:
Hi all!
I have a server with postfix with virtual users (using MySQL),
it's working ok, let's call it A. I also have a secondary server,
which I want to use
El 23/07/2012 12:13, Nicolás escribió:
Hi all!
I have a server with postfix with virtual users (using MySQL), it's
working ok, let's call it A. I also have a secondary server, which I
want to use to send mails even outside my local network, let's call it
B. So I'm trying to configure B
Foo postfix-...@gmail.com --tls=true
Could someone tell me what am I doing wrong? I thought using
'smtp_sasl_auth_enable' at B would be enough to use SMTP authentication,
but it's not happening.
Thank you so much!
Nicolás
to
pickup and again filtered by header_checks, so it would be placed on
Hold again.
2) postsuper -H doesn't work either.
So how can I deliver one of those mails placed on the hold queue?
Thanx a lot!
Nicolás
authentication data)
Surprisingly on the server side (mail.domain.es) there's no log activity.
Any ideas of why is this happening?
Thank you very much.
Nicolás
El 20/06/2012 17:12, Dennis Guhl escribió:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:00:44PM +0100, Nicolás wrote:
Hi there!
[..]
The whole postconf -n command on the client, nagios.domain.es:
config_directory = /etc/postfix
relayhost = [domain.es]
Is it intentional that you turned MX lookups off? See
in advance!
Nicolás
El 08/06/2012 19:22, Reindl Harald escribió:
Am 08.06.2012 20:19, schrieb Patrick Westenberg:
Nicolás schrieb:
myaddr...@gmail.com: host devels.es[78.138.97.64] said: 550-Verification
failed forn...@subdomain.devels.es 550-The mail server could not
deliver mail
ton
El 08/06/2012 19:40, Patrick Westenberg escribió:
Nicolás schrieb:
myaddr...@gmail.com: host devels.es[78.138.97.64] said: 550-Verification
...
subdomain.devels.es. IN MX 0 mail.devels.es
The response comes from devels.es with 78.138.97.64 but your
MX-Records points to mail.devels.es
' is this? Is there any way to restrict
creating identities for users unless the administrator allows to do so?
I really would be worried if ANY user would create ANY identities and
use them the way he wants... Any ideas appreciated!
Thanks!
Nicolás
to
setup and configure use case 2 also.
p@rick
Thanks!
Nicolás
Thank you very much, Patrick.
Now it works the way I described :-))
Nicolás
= $alias_maps$aliasdatabase
regexp:/etc/postfix/virtual.regexp
hash:/etc/postfix/LDAPaddressbook.txt
ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-users.cf
2008/10/3 Noel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolás Velásquez O. wrote:
Hello,
I've googled around and been playing with relay_recipient_maps. I have
it as follows
Thanks, it was the reject_unverified_recipient. Now it is working...
2008/10/6 Brian Evans - Postfix List [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolás Velásquez O. wrote:
Hello,
We receive a high volume of mail for non nonexistent mailboxes, so we
want to prevent Postfix's SMTP probes to the nearest MTA, we
in
/etc/postfix/transport?
--
Nicolás Velásquez O.
Genève, Suisse
Mobile +41.797976460
38 matches
Mail list logo
